You think you know how to solve a cube. You've memorized the algorithms for the 3x3, you can probably finish a 2x2 in your sleep, and maybe you've even dabbled in the Megaminx. But then you pick up a Square One puzzle cube. It feels weird. It looks lopsided.
Suddenly, it happens.
One move, then another, and the thing isn't even a cube anymore. It’s a jagged, spikey mess of plastic that looks more like a piece of abstract art than a logic puzzle. That’s the "shape-shifting" element, and honestly, it’s exactly why most people give up within ten minutes.
The Square One, originally patented as the "Back to Square One" by Karel Hršel and Vojtěch Kopský in 1990, is a mechanical beast. Unlike a standard Rubik’s cube where every turn keeps the shape intact, the Square One changes its physical geometry based on how you twist it. It’s fundamentally different because it doesn't just use squares and rectangles; it uses kites and triangles. This creates a parity problem that has brought grown adults to tears.
What’s Going On Under the Hood?
If you take a standard 3x3, you have a fixed core. On a Square One puzzle cube, the mechanism is a sandwich. You have a top layer, a middle layer (the equator), and a bottom layer. The middle layer is split into two pieces, but they aren't even. Because of this, you can only make a "slash" move—a 180-degree turn—when the top and bottom layers are aligned in a specific way.
📖 Related: Might of the Ancients CRK: Which Free Ancient Hero Should You Actually Pick?
It’s restrictive. It’s annoying. It’s brilliant.
Most speedcubers find that the Square One requires a completely different part of the brain. While a 3x3 is about pattern recognition and finger tricks, the Square One is about understanding spatial volume. You aren't just moving colors; you're managing shapes. There are exactly 170,858,552,320 possible permutations. While that sounds like a lot—and it is—it's actually much less than a standard Rubik's cube. Yet, it feels infinitely more complex because the moves you want to make are often physically blocked by the puzzle's own geometry.
The Shape-Shifting Nightmare
Phase one of any solve is getting the thing back into a cube shape. This is called "Cube Shape" or "CS" in the cubing community.
It sounds easy. It isn't.
There are 90 distinct shapes the Square One can take. Some look like stars, some look like weird birds, and others look like nothing at all. You have to navigate through these states to return to a hexahedron. Expert solvers like Vicenzo Guerino or the current world record holders don't just "guess" their way back to a cube. They use a specific notation system.
Instead of R, U, L, F moves, you use coordinates. A move looks like (3, -1). This means you rotate the top layer 3 units (90 degrees) clockwise and the bottom layer 1 unit (30 degrees) counter-clockwise. Then you slash (/).
Why the Middle Layer Matters
Most beginners forget the middle layer. If that little horizontal bar is misaligned, you can't slash. If you can't slash, you can't move. You’re stuck. Honestly, if you’re looking to buy your first Square One, look for one with a "magnetic" core or specialized magnets in the equator. Brands like MoYu or QiYi (the MGC Square-1 is basically the gold standard right now) have made the turning so much smoother. The old ones from the 90s? They felt like turning a grinder full of sand.
The Parity Problem No One Tells You About
Let’s talk about the Wall. The Parity Error.
You’ve spent twenty minutes getting the cube back to a cube. You’ve solved the corners. You’ve solved the edges. Everything looks perfect except for two tiny pieces on the top layer that need to swap. On a normal cube, that’s a quick algorithm.
On a Square One puzzle cube, it’s a disaster.
Square One parity happens because of the way the pieces are permuted. To fix just two pieces, you often have to temporarily break the cube shape, go back into a "scrambled" shape, perform a long sequence of moves, and then bring it back to a cube. It is arguably the most frustrating moment in all of twisty puzzles.
Some people use the "Lin" method or the "Vandenbergh" method to handle this. The Vandenbergh method is the most popular. It breaks the solve into:
- Cube Shape
- Corner Orientation (CO)
- Edge Orientation (EO)
- Corner Permutation (CP)
- Edge Permutation (EP)
- Parity fix (if needed)
Choosing Your First Square One
Don't go to a random toy store and buy a generic brand. You'll regret it. The plastic will catch, the pieces will "pop" (fly across the room), and you’ll end up throwing it in a drawer.
The QiYi MGC Magnetic Square-1 is the current king. It’s affordable and the magnets help keep those weirdly shaped pieces in line. If you want something a bit more premium, look at the X-Man Design Volt V2. It has a more solid feel, though some find it a bit "clunky" compared to the MGC.
The tensioning is key. If it's too loose, the shape-shifting will cause the puzzle to fall apart in your hands. Too tight, and you won't be able to pull off the quick (3,0) turns needed for speed.
How to Actually Get Better
Stop trying to memorize 100 algorithms on day one. It’s a trap.
First, just learn how to get it into a cube shape by feel. Experiment. See how the "kites" (the big pieces) and the "triangles" (the small pieces) interact. Once you can reliably turn it back into a cube, learn the basic Corner Orientation.
👉 See also: Card Games to Play with Kids: Why Most Parents Overthink It
You should also watch some of Brandon Lin’s old tutorials or look up the current methods used by world-class solvers like Max Siauw. The community is smaller than the 3x3 community, but it’s dedicated. They have their own discord servers and subreddits specifically for "Squan" (as the insiders call it).
Why Bother?
You might be wondering why anyone would subject themselves to a puzzle that literally tries to stop you from turning it.
It’s the satisfaction.
When you finally solve a Square One puzzle cube, you feel like you've mastered a higher dimension. A 3x3 is a solved problem. A Square One feels like a living thing. It’s chaotic, it’s jagged, and it’s beautiful when it finally clicks back into that perfect, smooth cube.
Your Next Steps
- Check your hardware. If you’re using a non-magnetic Square One, stop. Order a QiYi MGC or an X-Man Volt V2. The difference in frustration levels is night and day.
- Master Cube Shape (CS). Don't even look at the colors yet. Just practice turning the mess back into a cube. Use the "Star" method—it's the easiest way for beginners to group the small edge pieces together.
- Learn the Slash. Get comfortable with the coordinate notation. (1,0) is a 30-degree turn. (3,0) is a 90-degree turn. If you can't read the maps, you can't find the treasure.
- Accept the Parity. When you hit that final swap that seems impossible, don't throw the puzzle. Look up the "long" parity algorithm. Write it down. Repeat it until your fingers remember it so your brain doesn't have to.
- Film your solves. You’ll notice where you’re pausing. Usually, it’s during the transition from shape-shifting back to "cube mode." Smoothing that transition is how you drop your times from minutes to seconds.
The Square One isn't just a puzzle. It's a test of patience. Most people fail the test. If you can solve it, you're already ahead of 99% of the people who call themselves "cubers."