What Really Happened With President Trump Attempts to Exert Control Over the Federal Reserve

What Really Happened With President Trump Attempts to Exert Control Over the Federal Reserve

Ever tried to drive a car while someone in the passenger seat kept grabbing the steering wheel? That’s basically the vibe at the Eccles Building right now. For months, the headlines have been screaming about President Trump attempts to exert control over the Federal Reserve, and honestly, it’s getting pretty wild. We aren't just talking about a few mean tweets anymore. This is a full-on legal and political cage match over who gets to decide how much your mortgage costs.

The Fed is supposed to be the "adult in the room." They’re the ones who hike interest rates when things get too expensive or lower them when the economy starts to choke. Historically, the President stays out of it. It's a "church and state" kind of deal. But Donald Trump has basically taken a sledgehammer to that wall. He thinks the President should have a "say" in interest rates because, in his words, his instincts are better than the "people that would be on the Federal Reserve."

It’s a massive gamble.

The Battle for the Steering Wheel

Most people think the Fed just does its own thing. And for about 70 years, they did. But 2025 and early 2026 have seen an escalation that would make a political thriller writer blush. It started with verbal jabs—calling Chair Jerome Powell "stubborn" or "incompetent." Then it got real.

The Justice Department actually opened a criminal investigation into Powell. The excuse? A $2.5 billion renovation project at the Fed’s headquarters that's reportedly over budget. Powell isn't taking it lying down. He released a video statement essentially saying the whole thing is a "pretext" to bully the Fed into lowering interest rates. Imagine being the head of the world's most powerful central bank and having the DOJ knocking on your door over a construction bill. It’s unprecedented.

✨ Don't miss: Pacific Plus International Inc: Why This Food Importer is a Secret Weapon for Restaurants

Then there’s the case of Governor Lisa Cook. Trump tried to fire her—the first time a president has tried to oust a Fed governor in over a century. The administration pointed to some allegations about mortgage fraud, but the Supreme Court had to step in just to keep her in her seat while the lawyers duked it out.

Why does Trump want control so badly?

It’s pretty simple: cheap money. Low interest rates make the stock market look great and make it cheaper for people to buy houses and cars. If you’re a president looking toward an election or just wanting to juice the GDP, you want those rates at zero yesterday.

But the Fed is worried about inflation. They’ve seen what happens when you keep the party going too long—everything gets expensive, and the currency loses its value.

  • Trump’s View: "I made a lot of money... I have better instincts." He views the Fed as a "deep state" roadblock to growth.
  • The Fed’s View: Political interference leads to 1970s-style hyperinflation. If investors think the Fed is just a puppet for the White House, they stop trusting the U.S. dollar.
  • The Market’s View: Total confusion. One day the dollar is up, the next it’s down because of a subpoena.

The 2026 Succession Crisis

Jerome Powell’s term as Chair ends in May 2026. This is the "Endgame" for the administration's plan. Trump is currently vetting "the two Kevins"—Kevin Hassett and Kevin Warsh.

🔗 Read more: AOL CEO Tim Armstrong: What Most People Get Wrong About the Comeback King

Hassett is the current head of the National Economic Council. He’s a loyalist, but even Trump seems hesitant to move him because he’s "good on TV." Warsh is a former Fed governor who has been a critic of how the bank has handled things lately.

But here is the kicker. Even if Trump picks a new Chair, Powell might not leave. His term as a Governor doesn't end until 2028. He could stay on the board just to be a thorn in the side of the new administration. If he stays, Trump only has a few spots to fill with his own people. It’s like a game of musical chairs where nobody wants to sit down.

What This Means for Your Wallet

You might be wondering why you should care about a bunch of guys in suits arguing in D.C.

Well, if the President successfully exerts control over the Fed, the "risk premium" for the U.S. goes up. Basically, the world starts treating us like an emerging market. If the Fed cuts rates because the President said so, rather than because the data says so, inflation could come roaring back.

💡 You might also like: Wall Street Lays an Egg: The Truth About the Most Famous Headline in History

We’ve seen this movie before in places like Turkey or Argentina. When the guy in the big office calls the shots on interest rates, the currency usually takes a nosedive.

Actionable Insights for Investors

If you're watching this drama unfold, here is how to play it:

  1. Watch the Senate: GOP Senators like Thom Tillis have already said they won't confirm a new Fed Chair until the "legal intimidation" stops. If the Senate blocks Trump's picks, expect massive market volatility.
  2. Hedge for Inflation: If the Fed's independence actually breaks, "hard assets" like gold or even certain crypto (Trump’s proposed "Strategic Crypto Reserve") might become the go-to safety play.
  3. Don't Bank on Rate Cuts: Just because Trump wants them doesn't mean they're happening. The Fed has shown it’s willing to stay high just to prove it still has its "spine."

The reality is that President Trump attempts to exert control over the Federal Reserve have created a "new normal" where the central bank is a political football. Whether you love the guy or hate him, the era of the "quiet, boring Fed" is officially over.

Keep an eye on the May 2026 deadline. That’s when we’ll see if the "steering wheel" actually snaps off.

Your Next Steps:
Check your portfolio’s exposure to interest-rate-sensitive sectors like real estate and utilities. With the current tension between the White House and the Fed, the "predictable" rate path is gone. Consider shifting toward shorter-duration bonds to stay flexible while the succession battle plays out in the Senate this spring.