You’ve probably seen the cans everywhere. Bright colors, "fitness energy" branding, and a stock price that seemingly went to the moon over the last few years. But behind the massive corporate success of Celsius Holdings Inc. lies a legal battle that sounds like something straight out of a Hollywood boardroom drama.
Honestly, when people talk about the Flo Rida lawsuit, they usually focus on the eye-popping dollar amount. We're talking about $82.6 million. That is a lot of "Low" royalties.
But the case wasn't just about a celebrity wanting a payday. It was a messy, granular fight over "units," stock benchmarks, and whether a global superstar actually "birthed" a brand that was once on the verge of total collapse.
The $82 Million Question: Why Did Flo Rida Sue?
The beef started back in 2021. Flo Rida—legal name Tramar Dillard—and his production company, Strong Arm Productions, filed a lawsuit in Broward County, Florida. The claim? Celsius breached their endorsement deals from 2014 and 2016.
Back in 2014, Celsius wasn’t the behemoth it is today. It was a tiny company trading for less than $1 a share. They were deep in debt. They needed a face. Flo Rida stepped in as a brand ambassador, and by all accounts, he did the work. He was photographed with the cans everywhere. He helped launch "Flo Fusion."
The contract included specific "benchmarks." If the company hit certain sales goals or revenue targets, Flo Rida was supposed to get stock options and bonuses.
🔗 Read more: 1 US Dollar to 1 Canadian: Why Parity is a Rare Beast in the Currency Markets
The "Unit" Trap
Here is where it gets incredibly petty and technical. The 2014 contract said Flo Rida would get stock if a certain number of "units" were sold.
Celsius argued that "units" meant co-branded boxes or 12-packs. Flo Rida’s team argued that "units" meant individual servings—including the little powder sticks you mix into water.
- Celsius's Take: We didn't hit the goals. The success came later, after the contract ended.
- Flo Rida's Take: You hit the goals, you just didn't tell me, and you used "vague" language to hide the money.
It turns out, the jury agreed with the rapper. They found that Celsius not only breached the contract but effectively "hid" the fact that those milestones had been reached.
The Verdict That Shook the Beverage World
In January 2023, the jury handed down a verdict that felt like a lightning bolt: $82.6 million.
If you're wondering how a $30,000 initial claim turned into $82 million, look at the stock market. Because the deal involved 1% ownership and hundreds of thousands of shares, the value of the "missed" payment ballooned as Celsius stock skyrocketed from pennies to over $100 per share.
💡 You might also like: Will the US ever pay off its debt? The blunt reality of a 34 trillion dollar problem
Basically, Flo Rida bet on the company when it was a "little tiny company in financial trouble," as his lawyer John Uustal put it. He took the risk. The jury decided he deserved the reward.
The 2025/2026 Legal Aftermath
Think it ended in 2023? Not quite. Big companies don't just write 80-million-dollar checks without a fight. Celsius appealed, of course. They argued the damages were calculated incorrectly and that the trial court made errors.
However, by late 2025, the Florida Supreme Court declined to review the lower court's decisions. This effectively "cemented" the win for Dillard. Recent updates heading into 2026 show the case moving back to trial courts for very specific "valuation date" adjustments, meaning the final payout—including interest—could actually swing between $55 million and nearly $100 million depending on which specific day the court decides the stock should have been handed over.
Why This Case Matters for Every Creator
This isn't just "celeb news." It’s a landmark case for "sweat equity."
Many influencers and artists sign "partnership" deals where they get a piece of the company. Usually, the corporate legal team writes these contracts to be as confusing as possible. The Flo Rida lawsuit proves that if a celebrity (or any partner) actually provides the "launchpad" for a brand's success, the courts might actually hold the corporation's feet to the fire regarding those confusing "benchmarks."
📖 Related: Pacific Plus International Inc: Why This Food Importer is a Secret Weapon for Restaurants
Lessons from the Celsius Battle
- Definitions are everything. If your contract says "units," define what a unit is. Is it a pallet? A can? A single powder stick?
- Audit your partners. Flo Rida’s team didn't know the benchmarks were hit because the company didn't tell them. If you have a revenue-based bonus, you need the right to see the books.
- The "Successor" argument rarely works. Celsius tried to say they got big after Flo Rida. The jury didn't care. They saw that he "planted the seed."
Moving Forward: The Actionable Takeaway
If you are entering a business partnership or an endorsement deal, you have to be proactive. Don't wait seven years to check if you're owed money.
- Hire a forensic accountant if you suspect a partner is hiding revenue or "redefining" sales terms.
- Demand transparency in automated reporting. You shouldn't have to "ask" if a benchmark was hit; the data should be shared quarterly.
- Value your early-stage risk. If you’re helping a "distressed" or "small" brand, ensure your equity or "stock options" are clearly protected against future dilution or corporate "forgetfulness."
Flo Rida still says he drinks Celsius. He even still owns stock in it. He just wanted the "family" he helped build to pay what they promised. It took years of litigation, but it seems the "Right Round" singer finally got his square deal.
The final valuation of those shares is the only thing left on the table. Whether it’s $82 million or $100 million, the message is clear: when the "units" start moving, the checks better start following.
Strategic Note: To stay protected in high-stakes endorsement deals, always ensure your contract includes a "Most Favored Nations" clause or a mandatory third-party audit trigger whenever the company undergoes a significant valuation change or IPO. This prevents the "vague language" trap that nearly cost Flo Rida his 1% stake.