It is almost impossible to talk about the history of sci-fi cinema without stumbling over the bleach-blonde, plastic-perfection of Jude Law in Steven Spielberg’s 2001 epic, A.I. Artificial Intelligence. Law didn't just play a robot. He inhabited a specific, unsettling vision of what human desire looks like when it's manufactured on an assembly line.
Think back to the early 2000s. We were just getting over the Y2K scare. The internet was still a screeching dial-up mess for most people. Then comes Jude Law as Gigolo Joe, a "Mecha" designed for one purpose: to please. It was a role that required a jarring blend of physical mime, balletic grace, and a deep, underlying sadness that most actors would have completely missed.
People often forget how weird this movie actually is. It’s a Frankenstein’s monster of a project—started by Stanley Kubrick, finished by Spielberg. That tension between Kubrick’s cold cynicism and Spielberg’s sentimental wonder is exactly where artificial intelligence Jude Law thrives. He is the bridge between the two directors. He is "love" as a programmed function.
The Physicality of a Machine
How do you act like a machine that is pretending to be a human? Law supposedly spent weeks working with dancers and mimes to nail that signature "Joe" walk. It’s a rhythmic, slightly-too-smooth strut that feels like a heartbeat. He doesn't just walk; he flows.
Honestly, the makeup alone was a feat. They used a specific type of prosthetic and heavy, reflective paint to give Law’s face a literal "plastic" sheen. This wasn't just to make him look handsome. It was to create the "Uncanny Valley" effect before we even had a popular term for it. When you look at him, your brain tells you that’s a person, but your gut says something is wrong here.
Joe is a lover, but he’s also a fugitive. He’s framed for a murder he didn't commit, which adds this weird noir layer to the film. It’s basically Casablanca if Rick Blaine was made of circuits and hydraulic fluid. Law plays it with a wink, literally. He has this built-in music player that kicks in during his "sessions." It’s charming. It’s also deeply creepy if you think about it for more than five seconds.
✨ Don't miss: Joan and Melissa: Joan Knows Best? Why This Reality Relic Still Hits Hard
Why Jude Law’s Artificial Intelligence Performance Predicted Our Modern Anxiety
We’re living in 2026. Real-world AI isn't a plastic Jude Law knocking on our door yet, but the emotional logic of Gigolo Joe is everywhere. We have LLMs that "hallucinate" personalities. We have people forming genuine romantic attachments to chatbots.
Joe’s most famous line hits different now: "She loves what you do for her, as my clients love what I do for them. But she does not love you, David. She cannot love you. You are as unique as you are alone." He’s the only one telling the truth to David (Haley Joel Osment). While the humans are obsessed with the "morality" of Mechas, Joe understands the cold reality of their existence. They are tools. They are mirrors. If a human looks into an AI and sees love, Joe knows it’s just a reflection of their own ego.
The Kubrick vs. Spielberg Tug-of-War
Kubrick worked on this for decades. He wanted a real robot to play David because he didn't think a child actor could capture the emptiness. Spielberg disagreed. He wanted the heart.
Law represents the Kubrick side. He is the technical marvel. He’s the one who reminds us that no matter how much David wants to be a "Real Boy," he is still a product with a serial number. Joe is the ultimate pragmatist. He knows that when the lights go out and the humans are gone, the machines are just left with their programming.
It’s a performance that should have been nominated for more awards, frankly. People saw the "pretty boy" and missed the technical mastery. Law had to maintain that rigid, perfect posture for hours. He had to speak in a specific, slightly stilted cadence that suggested his "voice box" was optimized for flirtation rather than deep philosophy.
The Tragedy of the "Mecha"
There is a scene at the Flesh Fair—a horrific demolition derby where humans destroy robots for sport—that feels more relevant than ever. It’s about the fear of the "other."
- Humans hate the Mechas because the Mechas don't age.
- The Mechas are "perfect" versions of us, which makes us feel obsolete.
- Joe survives because he is useful, but only as long as he’s functional.
When Joe is finally "caught" by the authorities, he doesn't scream. He doesn't beg. He fixes his hair. He accepts his fate because he was never programmed with a survival instinct that transcends his utility. It’s a quiet, devastating end for a character that brought so much kinetic energy to the first half of the film.
Beyond the Screen: Law’s Long-Term Impact on Sci-Fi
Since 2001, we’ve seen plenty of AI characters. Alicia Vikander in Ex Machina. The various iterations of Westworld. Even the voice-only performance of Scarlett Johansson in Her.
But none of them quite capture the "performance" of humanity like Law did. He wasn't trying to be human. He was playing a machine that was expertly designed to mimic a very specific type of human—the 1940s Hollywood leading man.
The artificial intelligence Jude Law archetype is the "Service AI." Not the "Destroy All Humans" Skynet type, but the "I will give you exactly what you think you want" type. That is the AI we are actually building today. We aren't building Terminators; we are building Gigolo Joes. We are building algorithms that tell us we’re right, that entertain us, and that cater to our specific psychological needs.
💡 You might also like: Christy Hunt Dance Moms: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
Misconceptions About the Character
A lot of people think Joe was just a sidekick. That’s a mistake. Joe is the audience’s POV character for the middle third of the movie.
Without Joe, the movie is just a sad kid looking for a blue fairy. With Joe, the movie becomes an exploration of the world humans left behind. He shows us Rogue City. He shows us the neon-drenched underbelly of a society that has replaced intimacy with commerce.
Another weird fact: Law actually studied the movements of Fred Astaire. He wanted Joe to feel like he was always "on stage." This is why he leans against walls in a way that seems gravity-defying. It’s why his hand gestures are so deliberate. He’s a product. Products don't have wasted motion.
Lessons From the Year 2001 (and 2026)
If you’re looking at AI today, you have to look at how we treat the "creatives" and "service" roles Joe represented. We are currently in a massive debate about whether AI can replace actors or writers.
The irony? Jude Law used his immense human talent to pretend to be an AI that was replacing human intimacy.
It’s a recursive loop of meta-commentary. We use humans to play robots so we can feel something about the robots we are building to replace humans.
What You Should Do Next
If you haven't watched A.I. Artificial Intelligence in a decade, go back and watch it now. It hits differently in the age of ChatGPT.
- Pay attention to the "Rogue City" sequence. It’s a masterclass in production design and shows Law’s physicality at its peak.
- Look for the small moments where Joe’s "programming" glitches—the way his eyes reset or how he reacts to sudden loud noises.
- Compare Joe’s lack of a "soul" to David’s desperate search for one. It asks the question: Is the machine that knows it's a machine more "honest" than the one that thinks it's a person?
The movie isn't just a fairy tale. It’s a warning about what happens when we build things to love us because we’ve forgotten how to love each other. Jude Law’s Gigolo Joe remains the most honest depiction of that future. He’s beautiful, he’s perfect, and he’s completely hollow.
✨ Don't miss: Why Criminal Minds Season 9 Still Hits Different Years Later
Just like the best technology.
Basically, the film holds up because it doesn't try to answer the questions it poses. It just lets Law dance through the neon lights, a plastic god in a dying world, reminding us that being "real" is overrated if you've got the right programming.
To really grasp the nuance of Law’s performance, compare it to his later work in Contagion or even The Talented Mr. Ripley. You can see the same "golden boy" energy, but in A.I., he strips away the humanity to leave only the charisma. It’s a terrifyingly effective trick. He’s not a man; he’s an interface. And as we move further into the 2020s, we are all spending more time talking to interfaces than to people.
Joe was just the first one to look back at us and smile.
Next Steps for Deep Diving into Cinematic AI History
- Watch the "Behind the Scenes" footage specifically regarding Law’s movement coach. It reveals the sheer amount of physical labor required to look "effortless."
- Read the original short story by Brian Aldiss, Supertoys Last All Summer Long. It provides a much darker context for the world David and Joe inhabit.
- Analyze the lighting techniques used by Janusz Kamiński in the film; the use of "bloom" and overexposure was intentionally designed to make the Mechas look like they were glowing from within, a subtle nod to their internal power sources.