You’d think the law would be pretty clear about what counts as sexual harassment. But back in the mid-90s, if you were a man being harassed by other men at work, the legal system basically told you to "man up" and deal with it. It sounds wild now, but that was the actual reality until a guy named Joseph Oncale took his case all the way to the Supreme Court. Oncale v Sundowner Offshore Services changed everything. It wasn't just a win for one guy on an oil rig; it was the moment our legal system admitted that harassment is about power and environment, not just who wants to sleep with whom.
What Really Happened on that Oil Rig?
Joseph Oncale was working as a roustabout for Sundowner Offshore Services. Imagine being out in the Gulf of Mexico on an eight-man crew. You're stuck on a platform with the same people day in and day out. It’s high-stakes, dirty, and dangerous work.
Things turned south fast for Oncale. He wasn't just dealing with "locker room talk" or a bit of roughhousing. His supervisor and two other coworkers targeted him with sex-related, humiliating actions. It got physical. He was restrained. He was threatened with rape. Oncale did the right thing—he went to his supervisors. He complained. But the company's Safety Compliance Clerk didn't help; instead, he reportedly called Oncale a derogatory name suggesting he was gay.
Oncale eventually quit. He knew he had to get out of there. Honestly, he told the courts later that he felt if he didn't leave, he was going to be raped. When he left, he even asked that his pink slip say he was leaving "due to sexual harassment and verbal abuse."
💡 You might also like: 401k and roth ira calculator: Why Your Retirement Number is Probably Wrong
The Legal Wall
When Oncale tried to sue, he hit a massive wall. The District Court in Louisiana looked at his case and basically said, "Sorry, you're a man and they're men. Title VII doesn't cover this." The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals agreed. They relied on an old idea that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act was only meant to protect women from men, or maybe men from women, but never men from men.
It was a total dead end. Until the Supreme Court stepped in.
Why Oncale v Sundowner Offshore Services Changed the Rules
The Supreme Court took the case in 1997. In March 1998, they dropped a unanimous 9-0 decision that shocked a lot of people who thought they knew employment law. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion. If you know anything about Scalia, you know he was a "textualist." He didn't care what Congress meant to do back in 1964; he cared about what the words on the page actually said.
The law says you can't discriminate "because of sex."
💡 You might also like: A cuánto está el dólar en méxico hoy: Lo que realmente mueve tu dinero
Scalia argued that "because of sex" doesn't have a footnote saying "except when both people are guys." He famously wrote that while male-on-male harassment wasn't the "principal evil" Congress was worried about in the 60s, statutory prohibitions often go beyond the main thing they were trying to fix.
The "General Civility Code" Worry
One of the biggest arguments against Oncale was that if the Court allowed this, every office prank or "butt slap" on a football field would lead to a lawsuit. The industry was terrified that the workplace would turn into a place where nobody could say anything.
The Court shot that down. They said Title VII isn't a "general civility code." To win a case, the behavior has to be:
- Because of sex: You have to prove it happened because you are a man or a woman.
- Severe or pervasive: It can't just be one bad joke. It has to be serious enough to change the actual conditions of your job.
Basically, the Court said we can trust juries to know the difference between a coach patting a player on the back and the nightmare Joseph Oncale went through.
The Nuance: It’s Not Just About Sexual Desire
This is the part most people get wrong about Oncale v Sundowner Offshore Services. People assume that for it to be sexual harassment, someone has to be "hitting on" someone else.
Nope.
The Supreme Court made it clear that the harasser doesn't have to be motivated by sexual desire. A woman can harass another woman because she hates women in the workplace. A man can harass another man to humiliate him because he doesn't fit a certain "macho" mold. It’s about the behavior being tied to the person's sex.
Why This Case is a Big Deal Today
You might be wondering why a case from 1998 about an oil rig still matters in 2026.
It’s because Oncale laid the tracks for the massive Bostock v. Clayton County decision in 2020. That was the case that finally confirmed Title VII protects LGBTQ+ employees. The logic Scalia used in Oncale—that we have to follow the literal text of the law regardless of what the 1964 lawmakers were thinking—was the exact same logic the Court used decades later to protect gay and transgender workers.
Without Oncale, we might still be stuck in a world where the law only protects you if the "right" kind of person is harassing you.
Actionable Insights for the Modern Workplace
If you're a business owner, a manager, or just someone who wants to make sure their workplace isn't a legal time bomb, here is what you need to take away from this:
- Throw out the "Boys will be Boys" excuse. If the behavior is sexualized and targeted, it doesn't matter if it's "just a joke" between guys. The law doesn't see it that way.
- Focus on the environment. It’s not just about one-on-one interactions. If the culture of your office or job site is "objectively hostile," you're at risk.
- Document everything. Oncale’s case was bolstered because he tried to fix it internally first and documented his departure. If you’re a manager, take those "minor" complaints seriously before they turn into Supreme Court cases.
- Training needs to be real. Stop using those generic 1990s videos. Your team needs to understand that harassment is about power, gender stereotypes, and creating a "disadvantageous" work environment.
Joseph Oncale ended up settling his case out of court after the Supreme Court victory. He never got a huge public payout that we know of, but he changed the landscape of American labor law forever. He proved that no matter where you work—even on an isolated rig in the middle of the ocean—you have the right to do your job without being sexually degraded by your peers.
📖 Related: Lowe's Open on Easter: What You Actually Need to Know
Next Steps for Your Business
Review your current harassment policy to ensure it explicitly covers same-sex harassment and harassment not motivated by sexual desire. Most "off-the-shelf" HR policies are still too narrow. You should also check your "reporting chain" to make sure employees have a way to report issues if their direct supervisor is the one involved in the behavior, as was the case with the crane operator and driller in the Sundowner case.