You've heard it a thousand times at Thanksgiving or on the news. Someone bangs the table and insists the stock market only breathes when a Republican is in the White House. Then your uncle counters that jobs only show up when a Democrat is in charge. It’s the ultimate American debate. But honestly, if you look at the cold, hard spreadsheets from the last 80 years, the answer isn't a simple "yes" or "no." It's more like a "usually, but with massive asterisks."
Most people think of the economy as a car that the President drives. In reality, it’s more like a giant, slow-moving ship. The President is at the helm, sure, but the engine is powered by global oil prices, the Federal Reserve's interest rates, and whether or not a global pandemic decides to show up uninvited. Still, the data we have since World War II shows some pretty startling patterns that might hurt your brain if you're loyal to one specific party.
Is the economy better under democrats or republicans when looking at growth?
If we're talking about pure speed—how much the country actually produces—the blue team has a historical lead. Economists Alan Blinder and Mark Watson from Princeton did a massive dive into this. They found that from Truman all the way through Obama’s first term, the economy grew about 1.8 percentage points faster under Democrats. We're talking an average real GDP growth of about 4.3% for Democrats compared to 2.5% for Republicans. That’s not a tiny gap. It’s a canyon.
Why? Well, it’s not necessarily because Democratic policies are "magic." Blinder and Watson suggested it might just be luck. Democrats happened to be in power during periods of lower oil prices and better technological booms. They also tended to see more growth in the economies of our trading partners. Basically, they caught the right waves.
But let’s look at the "best years." Harry Truman actually holds the record for the single best year of growth at 8.7% in 1950. On the flip side, the worst years often hit during Republican terms. Think about the 2008 financial crisis under George W. Bush or the COVID-19 crash in 2020. Ten of the last eleven recessions actually started while a Republican was in office. That sounds like a smoking gun, but many conservatives argue that Republicans often "inherit" the bubbles that Democrats blow up before they pop.
The Jobs Machine and Unemployment
When you walk into a voting booth, you're probably thinking about your paycheck. Or your neighbor’s lack of one. Since 1945, the job market has behaved very differently depending on who is in the Oval Office.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Tractor Supply Company Survey Actually Matters for Your Next Visit
Democratic presidents have presided over the creation of roughly 83 million net jobs.
Republican presidents? About 32 million.
That is a huge disparity. If you look at the last few decades, the unemployment rate has almost always been lower at the end of a Democratic presidency than it was at the start. Clinton saw it drop. Obama saw it drop after the Great Recession. Biden saw it hit 50-year lows. Reagan is the main Republican standout here—he’s the only one in the last 40 years to leave office with a lower unemployment rate than when he started.
Stock Market Returns: The Great Surprise
This is where the "conventional wisdom" usually dies a quiet death. You’d think the "pro-business" party would be the undisputed king of Wall Street. Nope.
If you put $10,000 into the S&P 500 in 1926 and only left it there when a Democrat was President, you’d have significantly more money than if you only invested under Republicans. Historically, the S&P 500 has returned about 14.8% annually under Democrats versus 9.3% under Republicans.
Wait. Does that mean Wall Street loves taxes and regulation? Kinda doubtful. It’s more likely that the stock market reflects the broader GDP growth mentioned earlier. When the economy is growing at 4%, companies make more money, and their stocks go up. It’s not rocket science, but it’s definitely not what the campaign commercials tell you.
🔗 Read more: Why the Elon Musk Doge Treasury Block Injunction is Shaking Up Washington
The Inflation and Deficit Headache
Now, if you're a Republican, this is where you start nodding. Inflation is often the Achilles' heel for Democrats. Look at Jimmy Carter in the late 70s or the post-pandemic spike under Joe Biden. While the average inflation rate over 80 years is pretty similar for both parties (around 3.6%), Democrats often see inflation rise during their terms, while Republicans are better at presided over periods where it falls.
And then there's the debt. This is where it gets weird.
- Republicans generally advocate for smaller government but often pass large tax cuts (like Reagan or Trump) that aren't matched by spending cuts. This usually sends the deficit upward.
- Democrats spend more on social programs but sometimes see the deficit shrink because of higher tax revenue from a booming economy (like under Clinton).
According to data from the Joint Economic Committee, federal budget deficits as a percentage of GDP have actually been slightly higher on average under Republican presidents. It’s a total flip of the "fiscal conservative" narrative we've been fed for years.
Is the economy better under democrats or republicans? The Luck Factor
We have to be fair here. A president doesn't have a "make the economy good" button on their desk.
If you get elected and six months later a global pandemic shuts down every store on earth, is that your fault? Probably not. If you get elected right as the internet is being invented and everyone is buying computers for the first time, did you "create" that boom? Not really.
💡 You might also like: Why Saying Sorry We Are Closed on Friday is Actually Good for Your Business
The "Luck of the Irish" (or the Democrats) is a real theory in economics. Democrats have historically taken office during the early or middle stages of an economic expansion. Republicans have more frequently been at the helm when the cycle was simply "tired" and ready for a correction.
Actionable Insights for Your Wallet
So, what do you actually do with this info? Don't move your entire 401(k) to cash just because an election went a certain way.
- Stay Invested: The market has gone up under almost every president over the long haul. Trying to time the market based on the White House is a losing game.
- Watch the Fed, Not Just the President: Jerome Powell (or whoever is the Fed Chair) has way more immediate impact on your mortgage rate and the price of eggs than the guy in the Oval Office.
- Diversify: Since different parties tend to favor different sectors (Republicans like energy and defense; Democrats like green tech and healthcare), keeping a mix of stocks protects you regardless of who wins.
The data shows a clear leaning toward better growth and job numbers under Democrats, but the "why" is a messy mix of policy, timing, and pure luck. Instead of betting on a party, bet on the fact that the American economy is remarkably resilient regardless of who is currently sleeping in the White House.
Check the historical jobs reports and GDP data yourself at the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) to see how these cycles overlap with your own financial milestones.