Helm, that post was insightful and inspiring. Thank you, sincerely, for taking the time to post it. Your edit makes me weep with joy.
Looking between my version, yours, and the photo I am amazed at all the detail I threw away. I am less amazed, but more aware, of the way I got the facial features wrong. I fully understand your point about the skills involved in reproducing photos vs. creating unique images, and am with you 100% on that. I want to understand faces in the way you describe, and these reproductions of photos have been my attempt at that, in some way. I see now that it is not the way, though. You offered to explain your process of drawing a face, and if you feel like doing so I would eagerly listen and learn from it. I'm sure many other people who are learning this subject would find it helpful as well.
On the subject of making minor tweaks to an image that is flawed in a deeper way, you are correct again. I felt a little stupid making slight revisions over and over, but felt driven to capture this face. I am going to practice, and then attempt this image again in the future, from scratch.
A few questions and comments:
You say "counted incorrectly". This sounds like there is some technique you have for determining where things are on a face. Please share, if possible.
You say you brought in more contrast. I understand the term contrast, but what were you contrasting? Saturated vs. desaturated colors? Warm vs. cool colors? Dark vs. Light? Contrast has been an issue in most of the stuff I have done, yet I still don't fully understand the term.
When you say fundamental studies, I don't exactly know what that entails. Is it just drawing different faces with different light sources, with no reference?