AuthorTopic: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED  (Read 23387 times)

Offline Sherman Gill

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 995
  • Karma: +0/-1
    • View Profile

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #10 on: February 20, 2008, 06:48:34 pm
I'd call it subpixelling. :-\
Oh yes naked women are beautiful
But I like shrimps more haha ;)

Offline ptoing

  • 0101
  • ****
  • Posts: 3063
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • variegated quadrangle arranger
    • the_ptoing
    • http://pixeljoint.com/p/2191.htm
    • View Profile
    • Perpetually inactive website

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #11 on: February 20, 2008, 07:06:06 pm
not really subpixelling. I think there is no name for it. it's basically weight due to value.
There are no ugly colours, only ugly combinations of colours.

Offline Indigo

  • Administrator
  • 0011
  • *
  • Posts: 946
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Artist, Indie Game Dev
    • DanFessler
    • DanFessler
    • http://pixeljoint.com/p/849.htm
    • DanFessler
    • DanFessler
    • View Profile
    • Portfolio

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #12 on: February 20, 2008, 09:27:36 pm
it's no AA...or selout.....or is it?

answer: all of the above


same image with filled half.  Shows how it can be used for advanced AA to hint towards curves.

Offline Helm

  • Moderator
  • 0110
  • *
  • Posts: 5159
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Asides-Bsides

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #13 on: February 20, 2008, 09:42:38 pm
Here is the quintessential selout thread!

Come on, do a few searches! Help the place out!

Offline Lawrence

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 200
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #14 on: February 20, 2008, 10:04:13 pm
Indigo is right, it is just anti-aliasing. This is what happens when people blindly recite arbitrary rules (such is the anti-45-aa) without holistic consideration, it leads to people being confused like this. What also leads to confusion is the mixing up of definitions; so called "sub-pixelling" is antialiasing. And so is "weight due to value". They're all one and the same. If ever a special reference topic was needed, it would be one which cleared up people's misconceptions of those kind of terms.

Offline Helm

  • Moderator
  • 0110
  • *
  • Posts: 5159
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Asides-Bsides

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #15 on: February 20, 2008, 10:16:19 pm
I'd more precisely state it's not usually wise or needed to *buffer* a 45 degree line. But AAing is a bigger field yes, you can smooth things on the subpixel like this and in other ways.

Offline tocky

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 503
  • Karma: +0/-1
  • doublepostokrates
    • View Profile
    • my blog

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #16 on: February 21, 2008, 01:03:29 am

Offline Helm

  • Moderator
  • 0110
  • *
  • Posts: 5159
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Asides-Bsides

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #17 on: February 21, 2008, 02:41:42 am
Excellent. Can somebody find something that deals with straight ramps? it's a more tricky one.

Offline Feron

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1123
  • Karma: +0/-1
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
    • Pixelheart

Offline ptoing

  • 0101
  • ****
  • Posts: 3063
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • variegated quadrangle arranger
    • the_ptoing
    • http://pixeljoint.com/p/2191.htm
    • View Profile
    • Perpetually inactive website

Re: THE KEEN MINDS OF PIXELATION NEEDED

Reply #19 on: February 21, 2008, 11:04:31 am
Indigo is right, it is just anti-aliasing. This is what happens when people blindly recite arbitrary rules (such is the anti-45-aa) without holistic consideration, it leads to people being confused like this. What also leads to confusion is the mixing up of definitions; so called "sub-pixelling" is antialiasing. And so is "weight due to value". They're all one and the same. If ever a special reference topic was needed, it would be one which cleared up people's misconceptions of those kind of terms.

I agree somewhat. Tho in the example Adarias posted it is not AA imo. as it does not smooth a transition. Making one side black made it AA.
There are no ugly colours, only ugly combinations of colours.