AuthorTopic: Smile 2007 - Part 2  (Read 62026 times)

Offline Xion

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1551
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • FourbitFriday

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #60 on: June 21, 2007, 10:12:20 pm
snake smilies ftw! = D isn't transparent =/ but who cares!
I DEMAND THIS BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL SET.

'dit:
Mo'
« Last Edit: June 22, 2007, 01:02:31 am by Xion »

Offline dragonrc

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 218
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #61 on: June 22, 2007, 07:21:15 pm
« Last Edit: June 22, 2007, 07:48:03 pm by dragonrc »

Offline 1st

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 20
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Noet
    • View Profile

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #62 on: June 23, 2007, 12:13:36 pm
new !

=)    ( isn't transparent )
Max 300; characters remaining: 266

Offline Faktablad

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 526
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • grow
    • View Profile
    • Couchpixel

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #63 on: June 24, 2007, 08:21:06 pm
Yar, so I made a set based on my own smileys because.......I have no life.  haha

Offline Feron

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1123
  • Karma: +0/-1
  • Carpe Diem
    • View Profile
    • Pixelheart

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #64 on: June 24, 2007, 09:50:42 pm
Fak those are awesome, the only one that doesn't read well is :  :'( , because there the blues in his face can't make out the tears.

Offline Faceless

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 423
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #65 on: June 24, 2007, 11:14:47 pm
I don't think any of them read well...
They read much better at 2x.

Offline .TakaM

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1178
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
    • Fetch Quest

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #66 on: June 25, 2007, 04:22:57 am
and I think its best to leave thumbs up and thumbs down not attached to a face so they're more versatile  :hehe: :y: - :yell: :y::mean: :n::D :n: etc
Life without knowledge is death in disguise

Offline Faktablad

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 526
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • grow
    • View Profile
    • Couchpixel

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #67 on: June 25, 2007, 04:34:16 am
Feron: Thanks.  Actually there are no tears in that particular smiley...I decided they would be unnoticeable.

Faceless: They read pretty darn well for what I was trying to do: fit readable expressions onto a lifelike face within a 16x16 space.  Unfortunately I can't do much better without increasing the size, which I don't want to do, because I don't like the way large smileys break up text.

.TakaM: Gaah, jeez, you're right.  I'll try and work on that.

Offline Panda

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1008
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • 威風堂々
    • View Profile

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #68 on: June 25, 2007, 08:36:41 am
I think the purple ones read the best, and somehow fit the boards more.
The blue and green ones are hard to focus on (high sat. and all), and making the whole seeing-the-expression-at-a-first-glance rather tedious.

Oh also, anyone working on smiley sets, if you could put every smiley in individual images it'd make the adding thing way easier for us.

Offline tomas

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 38
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Smile 2007 - Part 2

Reply #69 on: June 25, 2007, 11:31:14 am
That's a real pretty set of smileys you got there, Faktablad. But I have to agree with Faceless that they're very hard to read. Especially at 1x, which is how they would be viewed on a board. Here's a quick suggestion how the readability could be improved a bit. I basically just changed the face detail color to pure black and made the details a bit bigger (without increasing the size of the squares).


(mine on the the bottom)