AuthorTopic: Proposed word filter  (Read 10025 times)

Offline robalan

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 337
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #10 on: March 09, 2007, 03:26:00 pm
I'm going to assume that the reason this thread makes no sense to me is because the word filter has been added and therefore whatever text was supposed to be changed to
Code: [Select]
[img] or [/img] has been changed accordingly and therefore shows up as being changed.  It would be nice to somehow post the text that is changed to that so that people who didn't read this thread before the filter was applied can see what niftiness has been added.
Always remember: a preposition is not something you should end a sentence with.

Offline ptoing

  • 0101
  • ****
  • Posts: 3063
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • variegated quadrangle arranger
    • the_ptoing
    • http://pixeljoint.com/p/2191.htm
    • View Profile
    • Perpetually inactive website

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #11 on: March 09, 2007, 03:28:30 pm
There are no ugly colours, only ugly combinations of colours.

Offline robalan

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 337
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #12 on: March 09, 2007, 03:42:36 pm
Ah, okay.  Cool that that has been changed :y:
Always remember: a preposition is not something you should end a sentence with.

Offline ndchristie

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 2426
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #13 on: March 09, 2007, 05:39:53 pm
am i the only one that thinks every "......" to "......." is exactly the same?  what changed....?
A mistake is a mistake.
The same mistake twice is a bad habit.
The same mistake three or more times is a motif.

Offline Panda

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1008
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • 威風堂々
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #14 on: March 09, 2007, 05:46:50 pm
Now "[ url=*][ img]" and "[ /img][ /url] are filtered and will only come up as img tags.

Offline 9_6

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 416
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #15 on: March 09, 2007, 05:57:05 pm
Good against those people who keep posting pictures with a link to imageshack (or something similar) making zooming in by clicking a pain.
Does scaling an image blur it?
Opera fix Firefox fix

Offline Akira

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 334
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Heheheh
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #16 on: March 09, 2007, 10:10:19 pm
now we need an announcement so people who don't obsessively read every topic will know about the change and the need for nozoom tags now.
thanks Dogmeat!

Offline MoD

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 140
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • mnky
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #17 on: March 10, 2007, 12:05:20 am
There are people that don't? :P

This is a good idea; it'll be nice to see topics without "Please remove imageshack link." posts.

Offline dragonrc

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 218
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #18 on: March 10, 2007, 03:22:49 pm
so, now you can post images without having to remove the url tags? Oh we are getting spoiled here :P
(test:)

Offline AdamAtomic

  • 0100
  • ***
  • Posts: 1188
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • natural born medic
    • View Profile
    • Adam Atomic

Re: Proposed word filter

Reply #19 on: March 10, 2007, 07:58:35 pm
I would like to propose a new word filter - any posts including the word "runescape" are deleted and the user is sent a warning for posting eyeball-raping "pixel art"...