wrong. first of all, i have used photoshop for over 2 years and it indeed does have many useless features that i haven't touched, and don't intend to.
second, all i wrote was that i don't recommend it, and that there are better tools to create pixels with that are cheaper and better for the job, making photoshop pointless.
i put paint shop pro, gimp, and paint.net in my list because they are cheep. i don't think either of those are fit for the job either, but they are all free/incredably cheep, and can handle pixel art the same way as photoshop.
if you want to use photoshop for pixel art, by all means, do so. i just was informing him that, IMO, there are better tools out there, and that through my experience, i don't find it having many benefits (pixel art wise, for digipainting, photo manip, etc, i wont touch anything else.) that you cant get elsewhere for free.