51
Archived Activities / Re: The Official Secret Santa 2007 Sign up
« on: November 26, 2007, 05:35:56 pm »
sin
me up.
me up.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Hmm, i pretty much disagree completely. The edit has all the soft-edged weaknesses of Quark's style without the pixel-perfect strengths. The originals, which granted are not superfaulous, were at least clear.
Simplification and reduction of business is a must, but don't take it to foolish extremes.
I love everything about these except for a few details:
the lines on the ground cobbles are too strong imo, and jagged. they actually flatten (to the picture plane, not the ground plain) and make your piece busy your piece instead of adding any positive texture or plane definition.
shadow of the gable's apex is silly, you billy.
lamps (as im sure you know) need assistance too.
Its modern art, so its a bag with shit in it nailed to a board.
Point I'm making is that using the term 'Modern Art' refers to all art at some point in history depending on your point in time(realistically) but it tends to applied to any art that is difficult to 'understand' because it's not a painting of a nice landscape or a bowl of fruit or a sculpture of some biblical figure... And in reality modenism began as an art movementin the late 19th and early 20th century and is still being used today (in a pejorative manner) which I personally find quite ironic.
So, what am I missing?