21
Archived Activities / Re: Smile 2007 - Part 1
« on: June 02, 2007, 01:20:24 pm »
B&W Smiley.
Not transparent because gimp won't work
Not transparent because gimp won't work
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
22
Pixel Art / Re: Squid Love
« on: June 02, 2007, 01:03:05 am »
Good progress, however I think you need to correct the shading on the breasts. They still don't read well.
23
Pixel Art / Re: Squid Love
« on: June 01, 2007, 11:46:29 am »
Made a quick edit to address some form issues, hope it helps.
I think your internal black lines conflict with your shading. Very nice improvement so far too.
I think your internal black lines conflict with your shading. Very nice improvement so far too.
24
Pixel Art / Re: Armoured ghoul + Fadatar
« on: June 01, 2007, 10:24:23 am »
Glad I'm not competing against you yet*. The Ghoul is starting to look awesome, it needs more readability on the basic forms before you add more detail and speculars. More diversity in the palette couldn't hurt.
*It's Lovely from tif ;@
*It's Lovely from tif ;@
25
Archived Activities / Re: Smile 2007 - Part 1
« on: May 22, 2007, 08:48:02 am »
A test. Pretty bad.
Edit:
Transparent, but I think the colours are messed up >_<
Edit:
Transparent, but I think the colours are messed up >_<
26
Pixel Art / Re: Prehistoric dinosaur
« on: May 20, 2007, 12:07:44 pm »
Wow, that dinosaur is incredible. How much time did it take to create?
My only critique is that the spines on its back are too uniform and the dithering on the beak could be improved.
I just noticed that the head's form (the top of it) appears too flat.
My only critique is that the spines on its back are too uniform and the dithering on the beak could be improved.
I just noticed that the head's form (the top of it) appears too flat.
27
Pixel Art / Re: Attack Animation- Crits Please!
« on: May 20, 2007, 12:01:42 pm »
The biggest problem here, to me, is the speed, range and staticness.
I think the attack would be better if one arm pulled back, the torso twisted, whilst the other arm came across the chest, then have the character lunging forward, plowing the arm in an arc away from the character, whilst having the character pivot and shift its weight from the hind leg, to the front leg (mid pivot) then to the new front leg.
I hope that makes sense.
I think an attack like that would add a lot more character to the animation.,
I think the attack would be better if one arm pulled back, the torso twisted, whilst the other arm came across the chest, then have the character lunging forward, plowing the arm in an arc away from the character, whilst having the character pivot and shift its weight from the hind leg, to the front leg (mid pivot) then to the new front leg.
I hope that makes sense.
I think an attack like that would add a lot more character to the animation.,
28
General Discussion / Re: One question about Pixelation emoticons
« on: May 20, 2007, 11:42:17 am »
To be honest, I'd like to think that the pixelation emoticons were unique to pixelation, considering they were made by pixelation users specifically for pixelation.
29
General Discussion / Re: Something to help to animators
« on: May 18, 2007, 09:53:15 am »
I think I broke it.
30
General Discussion / Re: Heard of Perler Bead?
« on: May 18, 2007, 09:38:02 am »
I think I used these when I was younger.
Is an iron involved to melt the little beads together?
Is an iron involved to melt the little beads together?