hrm....the thing about Subpixel...when done right it's not like you're averaging two pixels and putting a buffer shade in the next frame...am I getting trough?
You should have an image in your head a bit more detailed than your current resolution in order to do subpixel, otherwise its wasteful
You know how they say how subtext is the lines between the lines? I guess that applies to subpixel too, if there's no detail in there OTHER than what you're already showing with the pixels you have...the subpixels seem kinda pointless.
that shows in the way he moves, too...he just bobs up and down..there's nothing to the movement of the animation...I'm not saying it's not carefully done because it is...but you know, it seems like it lacks a point in the movement...subpixeling is after all deforming the character, and if he just sort of morphs one pixel up, one pixel down....it strikes you as weird....
so..eh whatever. That's my 2 cents