AuthorTopic: portrait **finished**  (Read 7605 times)

Offline sharprm

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • Karma: +0/-3
  • INTP/INTJ
    • View Profile

portrait **finished**

on: November 22, 2006, 12:52:06 am
Finished:



Reference:



« Last Edit: November 27, 2006, 12:15:50 pm by sharprm »
Modern artists are told that they must create something totally original-or risk being called "derivative".They've been indoctrinated with the concept that bad=good.The effect is always the same: Meaningless primitivism
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/phi

Offline GOODNIGHTdestroyer

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Unf Unf.
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #1 on: November 22, 2006, 12:57:58 am
I don't understand the darker shades next to the light ones, it looks really odd to me.
And I am finally seeing that you were the one worth eating.

Offline sharprm

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • Karma: +0/-3
  • INTP/INTJ
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #2 on: November 22, 2006, 01:03:39 am
Ok, I'll make her hair have less contrast and blend better. Is that what you meant?
Modern artists are told that they must create something totally original-or risk being called "derivative".They've been indoctrinated with the concept that bad=good.The effect is always the same: Meaningless primitivism
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/phi

Offline Joseph

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 246
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Shut up and pixel.
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #3 on: November 22, 2006, 01:13:22 am
did her other strap fall off? :o
also, the shading is wierd, and kinda sketchy (sharp and it uses wierd shapes)

Offline GOODNIGHTdestroyer

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 276
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Unf Unf.
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #4 on: November 22, 2006, 01:14:21 am
i meant the skint ones
And I am finally seeing that you were the one worth eating.

Offline meatcar

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #5 on: November 22, 2006, 01:19:53 am
Make the face a bit more petite. The left eye (her left) should be closer to the middle, and the eyebrow shorter and thinner.. make the shadows on the eyes more subtle.

Offline Ryumaru

  • Moderator
  • 0100
  • *
  • Posts: 1683
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • to be animated soonly
    • ChrisPariano
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #6 on: November 22, 2006, 02:42:16 am
your work always has wayy too much contrast going on, especially for a female. there are also edges that seem to always stay really hard in your work, needs some aa imo. other than that, the proportional work, and likeness etc is pretty well done.

Offline sharprm

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • Karma: +0/-3
  • INTP/INTJ
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #7 on: November 22, 2006, 02:50:30 am
Yeah its a bit sketchy but thats because its work in progress. I'll gradually smooth all.

Her strap didn't fall of, I'll draw Austin Powers next to her with a pair of scissors.

Thanks meat car, i moved her eye in, wasn't sure what you meant about the shadows but i made the shadow on her brow less
prominant.

Actually a friend helped me out with the last edit, she just moved the eyes, nose, mouth etc. around and fixed it up.
I think its a vast improvement - more like boyonce and less like a man.

Modern artists are told that they must create something totally original-or risk being called "derivative".They've been indoctrinated with the concept that bad=good.The effect is always the same: Meaningless primitivism
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/phi

Offline Helm

  • Moderator
  • 0110
  • *
  • Posts: 5159
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Asides-Bsides

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #8 on: November 22, 2006, 06:53:55 am
The gaze is more murderous still than it is seductive as in the reference. It has to do with the eyebrows being too strong, I think.

Offline Aleiav

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 141
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • I like my coffee black just like my metal.
    • View Profile
    • Gothiclola (dot) Net

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #9 on: November 22, 2006, 07:56:58 am
I agree with Helm. In the picture her eyebrows are lighter than her eyeliner.

Offline sharprm

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • Karma: +0/-3
  • INTP/INTJ
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #10 on: November 22, 2006, 09:08:54 am


I've made her eyeborws purple now and thinner. Hopefully she looks less angry. The body is just roughed out for now.
Modern artists are told that they must create something totally original-or risk being called "derivative".They've been indoctrinated with the concept that bad=good.The effect is always the same: Meaningless primitivism
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/phi

Offline Helm

  • Moderator
  • 0110
  • *
  • Posts: 5159
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • Asides-Bsides

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #11 on: November 22, 2006, 11:11:58 am
further womanification:



I'm afraid it's mostly a matter of following your reference closer in shapes and lights. I suggest finding the same pic in a bigger resolution. Always use bigger reference than the pixel size you'll remake in.

Offline sharprm

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • Karma: +0/-3
  • INTP/INTJ
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #12 on: November 22, 2006, 11:29:41 am
Great edit Helm. I will definately take it into account on future versions. I'm using a large reference:

http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e199/sharprm/beyonce-knowles-free-wallpapers-2.jpg

Here's an animation showing what hows its going at the moment. Second frame is helm's edit superimposed.



« Last Edit: November 22, 2006, 11:34:00 am by sharprm »
Modern artists are told that they must create something totally original-or risk being called "derivative".They've been indoctrinated with the concept that bad=good.The effect is always the same: Meaningless primitivism
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/phi

Offline sharprm

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • Karma: +0/-3
  • INTP/INTJ
    • View Profile

Re: portrait [wip]

Reply #13 on: November 24, 2006, 07:32:32 am
Edit: Finished image:



I'vve been working on this 3 days and I think its as good as it can get and I'm getting bored working on it. I think i learnt a bit
doing this piece and am happy with the result.

« Last Edit: November 25, 2006, 01:40:47 am by sharprm »
Modern artists are told that they must create something totally original-or risk being called "derivative".They've been indoctrinated with the concept that bad=good.The effect is always the same: Meaningless primitivism
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/phi

Offline Lelle

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 51
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: portrait **finished**

Reply #14 on: November 28, 2006, 01:49:50 pm
It looks awesome! Only thing that seem to bug me is that the lower part of her swimsuit is looking kind of flat. Maybe you could add some stretching to the fabric and make it tear more into her flesh. Iīm not as good with edits as you but I tried anyways hehe...


Try not to look at it at all for a week or so then open it up and voila all the little problems is usually glowing. Not as fun to work on old pieces though.

Thatīs a LOT of pixels in 3 days btw! :]

Cheers,

Lelle

Offline snader

  • 0001
  • *
  • Posts: 75
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: portrait **finished**

Reply #15 on: November 28, 2006, 05:51:23 pm
this doesnt look finished to me, it could improve soo much by the use of dithering and AA, right now it looks (to me) like rather quickly blocked-in shades

the arm and belly (belly in a lesser degree) are looking random, as well as the arm looking skinny
colours of the hair and suit aren't really working for me either

face has got a pretty good likeness though

Offline Senad

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 109
  • Karma: +0/-0
  • Pixelious Danger
    • View Profile

Re: portrait **finished**

Reply #16 on: November 28, 2006, 06:02:15 pm
that isnt finished :S.. lots more u could do.. try dithering it ;)
God forgive him for his sins I know its was his last minute, You spread his wings so he can only fly.. He will allways be a legend in our hearts and legends never die..

R.I.P Tose Proeski ~Senad

Offline ZoSo

  • 0010
  • *
  • Posts: 203
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile

Re: portrait **finished**

Reply #17 on: November 28, 2006, 06:25:59 pm
It does not really look finnished to me either, but if you say it is, then it is.. :O

Anyway you should dither everything, so it looks less.. plastic.

Offline sharprm

  • 0011
  • **
  • Posts: 660
  • Karma: +0/-3
  • INTP/INTJ
    • View Profile

Re: portrait **finished**

Reply #18 on: November 29, 2006, 02:04:37 am
Working on dithering now and i think it helps. Will post in a week or so. Will look into redoing the clothes. Like how you've made the
skin buldge on the edit, Lelle. No comments about the background - thats the part i think that looks nicest. 
Modern artists are told that they must create something totally original-or risk being called "derivative".They've been indoctrinated with the concept that bad=good.The effect is always the same: Meaningless primitivism
http://www.artrenewal.org/articles/Philosophy/phi