The relationship between a sitting president’s family and the journalists who cover them is always a mess of tension and high-stakes poker. But the saga involving Hunter Biden and Jake Tapper is something different entirely. It isn’t just about a laptop or a court case. It’s about how the media's lens shifted from skepticism to a brutal, late-game realization.
Honestly, if you look back at the last few years, the vibe has changed. Tapper, a guy who’s built a career on being the "equal opportunity offender" in Washington, found himself at the center of the storm as the facts about Hunter Biden’s business dealings began to outpace the political talking points.
The Turning Point of 2023
For a long time, the mainstream narrative around Hunter was... well, let's call it "cautious." Then came August 2023. Tapper did something that sent shockwaves through the beltway: he admitted on air that Donald Trump was actually right about a key point during the 2020 debates.
During those debates, Joe Biden had flat-out denied that Hunter made money from China. Tapper, citing reporting from the Washington Post and evidence from Hunter’s own court appearances, looked at the camera and basically said: "Trump was right. Hunter did make a fortune from China, and Joe Biden was wrong."
That moment wasn't just a news clip. It was a permission slip for the rest of the media to stop treating the Hunter Biden story like a conspiracy theory.
Original Sin and the "Cover-Up"
Fast forward to early 2025. Tapper, along with Axios reporter Alex Thompson, dropped a bombshell book titled Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-Up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again.
The book is heavy. It’s based on over 200 interviews. While it focuses largely on Joe Biden’s cognitive state, it paints a vivid picture of a "Politburo" (as Tapper calls the inner circle) that shielded the family from public scrutiny. We’re talking about figures like Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti, and Ron Klain. They weren't just managing a president; they were managing a legacy that was fraying at the edges.
Hunter Biden is the ghost in the machine of this narrative. The pressure of his legal battles—the 2024 gun conviction in Delaware and the subsequent tax trials—loomed over the White House like a dark cloud. Tapper’s reporting suggests that the family’s instinct to protect Hunter actually influenced Joe Biden's decision-making in ways that may have cost the Democrats the 2024 election.
Why the Conviction Changed Everything
When Hunter Biden was found guilty on federal gun charges in June 2024, Tapper's coverage was clinical. He didn't gloat, but he didn't mince words either. He stood on the CNN set and discussed the "unprecedented" nature of a sitting president's son becoming a convicted felon.
You've gotta understand how weird this was for DC. For years, the line was that the laptop was "Russian disinformation" or that the business deals were just "Republican smears." But Tapper started pushing back against the "gaslighting."
In his book, he describes the White House response to the Hunter story as a campaign of denial. It wasn't just about the facts; it was about the culture of the administration. They treated any question about Hunter’s lifestyle or foreign income as an attack on the President’s soul. Tapper argues that this defensiveness actually prevented the administration from being transparent until it was too late.
The Human Element
It’s easy to get lost in the "he-said, she-said" of cable news. But Tapper’s later reporting, especially in Original Sin, tries to frame this as a tragedy. He talks about a father (Joe) whose love for a struggling son (Hunter) blinded him to the political realities of the 2020s.
It’s a messy, human story.
Tapper has admitted he regrets not being more aggressive earlier on. "I barely scratched the surface," he told Terry Gross in a 2025 interview. That's a huge admission for a Chief Washington Correspondent. It suggests that the "media bubble" isn't just a myth—it's something even the most seasoned anchors struggle to pop.
What We Can Learn From the Fallout
The Hunter Biden and Jake Tapper story is basically a masterclass in how institutional trust breaks down. When the media spends years dismissing a story, only to have their lead anchors admit later that the "other side" had a point, it leaves the public feeling jerked around.
Here’s the reality:
- The Foreign Money: It’s no longer a debate. Hunter Biden reported millions in income from Chinese and Ukrainian interests.
- The Debate Denial: Joe Biden’s 2020 claims that "none of that is true" were factually incorrect.
- The Media Shift: Tapper’s pivot from 2020 to 2025 shows a journalist trying to reclaim credibility by admitting where the industry got it wrong.
If you’re trying to keep track of this today, look at the archival clips of The Lead with Jake Tapper from mid-2023. That’s where the mask really slipped.
Moving forward, the best way to process this is to stay skeptical of "official" narratives from any administration. The "Original Sin" here wasn't just the business deals or the health decline; it was the lack of transparency that forced journalists like Tapper to play catch-up years after the fact. Keep an eye on the legal filings from Hunter's various appeals—they often contain the granular details that the news cycles gloss over.
💡 You might also like: Why those prison Abu Ghraib photos still haunt US foreign policy today
Pay attention to how the "inner circle" mentioned in Tapper's book reacts to new revelations. The names Donilon and Ricchetti are just as important as Biden when it comes to understanding how the information was filtered. Reading Original Sin provides the specific context of the 200 interviews that clarified the "Weekend at Bernie's" environment Tapper eventually described.