Size matters. Honestly, if you’re trying to get a thumbnail to show up in the mobile SERPs or hoping to land a spot in the elusive Google Discover feed, the dimensions of your imagery are probably the most overlooked technical detail in your entire SEO strategy. You can write the best 3,000-word guide on the planet, but if your featured image is a tiny 300-pixel square, Google is likely going to pass you over for a competitor who actually followed the documentation. It’s annoying. It feels like busywork. But it is the literal gatekeeper to millions of clicks.
Google Discover is a different beast than traditional search. While standard search relies heavily on intent and keywords, Discover is all about visual appeal and "feed-worthiness." This is where the image size for Google Discover becomes a hard requirement rather than a suggestion. Google's own documentation is surprisingly blunt about this: they want large, high-quality images. Specifically, they state that large images need to be at least 1200 pixels wide.
The 1200-Pixel Rule and Why It Breaks People
If you're under 1200 pixels, you're basically invisible in Discover. Sure, your link might show up as a tiny, pathetic little thumbnail next to a block of text, but you won't get that "large image" card that takes up half a user's phone screen. Those large cards drive the click-through rates (CTR) that make Discover legendary for traffic spikes.
But it isn't just about the width. You’ve also got to enable the setting that allows Google to show those large images. This is handled via the max-image-preview:large robots meta tag. Most modern SEO plugins like Yoast or RankMath do this by default now, but I’ve seen plenty of custom-coded sites where this one line of code was missing, and the site owner couldn't figure out why their 4000px wide photos weren't doing anything. It’s a tragedy.
Aspect Ratios: The Square, the Rectangle, and the Mess
Google Discover prefers a 16:9 aspect ratio. It’s the cinematic standard. However, the Google app is fickle and sometimes crops things strangely depending on the user's device.
- 16:9 (1200 x 675px): This is your safe bet. It fits the card layout perfectly.
- 4:3 and 1:1: These still exist in standard search, but they look like garbage in Discover.
- The "Safe Zone": Keep your text or the main subject of the photo dead center.
I once worked with a travel blogger who had incredible vertical shots from a trip to Japan. They looked amazing on Pinterest. On Google Discover? They were cropped so aggressively that you could only see the middle of a pagoda and a stray power line. The context was gone. If you want to rank, you have to think like a TV producer, not a portrait photographer.
What about Standard Google Search?
Search is a bit more forgiving, but it’s still moving toward a more visual layout. Have you noticed how many mobile search results now feature a square thumbnail to the right of the meta description? That’s the "favicon" or the "thumbnail preview."
For standard search, Google generally pulls from your Schema markup—specifically the ImageObject defined in your Article or Product structured data. If you don't define an image there, Google's "crawler" (Googlebot-Image) will just grab whatever it thinks is the most relevant photo on the page. Sometimes it’s your logo. Sometimes it’s a random social media icon from your footer. It’s a roll of the dice you don't want to take.
WebP and Avif: The Performance Tax
You can't just upload a 5MB PNG and call it a day. Page speed is a ranking factor. Core Web Vitals (CWV) will crucify you if your "Largest Contentful Paint" (LCP) is a giant, unoptimized header image.
The current gold standard is WebP. It’s supported by every modern browser and offers significantly better compression than JPEG without making the photo look like it was taken with a potato. If you really want to be on the cutting edge, use AVIF, though it’s a bit more work to implement as a fallback.
Basically, your image needs to be:
📖 Related: Apple Create a Account: Why You're Probably Doing It Wrong
- Big enough to satisfy the 1200px requirement.
- Small enough (in file size) to load in under 2.5 seconds.
- Relevant enough that a human actually wants to click it.
The Role of Schema Markup
Schema is the "cheat code" for telling Google exactly which image to use. When you look at the JSON-LD code for a well-optimized page, you’ll see a section for image. You shouldn't just list one URL there. The pros list three: one for 1:1, one for 4:3, and one for 16:9.
Why? Because Google's various "surfaces" (Search, Images, Discover, Assistant) all have different preferences. By providing all three ratios in your Schema, you’re essentially giving Google a tailored suit for every occasion. It makes their job easier. When you make Google’s job easier, they reward you with better visibility. It’s a simple transaction.
A Quick Word on Alt Text
Stop stuffing keywords into your alt text. "Best image size for Google Discover 2026 cheap SEO tips" is not alt text. It’s spam. Alt text is for accessibility. It should describe what is actually in the image. If there’s a dog sitting on a surfboard, the alt text should say "Golden Retriever sitting on a blue surfboard in the ocean." Google’s AI is smart enough to see the dog anyway; you don't need to lie to it.
Common Mistakes That Kill Discover Rankings
The biggest killer is using "non-descriptive" images. You know the ones—stock photos of two people in suits shaking hands. Google’s algorithms are increasingly good at identifying generic imagery. They want original, high-quality content. If your image is found on 5,000 other websites, why would Google bother putting it in a personalized Discover feed?
Another mistake? Putting text over the image. If your featured image looks like a display ad, Google might treat it like one and filter it out. Discover is meant to feel like a curated magazine, not a classifieds page. Keep the text minimal or, better yet, non-existent on the primary image.
Practical Steps to Fix Your Images Right Now
Don't go back and fix every post you've ever written. That's a waste of time. Focus on your top 20 most important pages—the ones that already get some traffic but could do more.
First, check your width. If your featured images are 800px wide, you are leaving money on the table. Bump them up to at least 1200px. I personally prefer 1400px just to have a bit of a buffer for higher-density displays.
Second, verify your meta tags. Open your site, right-click, "View Page Source," and search for max-image-preview:large. If it’s not there, your Discover journey is over before it started.
Third, compress. Use tools like Squoosh.app or a WordPress plugin like ShortPixel. Aim for a file size under 150KB for that 1200px image. It’s doable.
Fourth, check your structured data. Use the Google Rich Results Test tool. Plug in your URL and see what Google sees. If it doesn't show a "Preview" of your article with the correct image, you need to fix your Schema.
Finally, look at your "Discovery" report in Google Search Console. It’s under the "Performance" tab. If your "Impressions" are high but your "Clicks" are low, your image probably sucks. It’s either too small to show the large preview, or it’s just not interesting enough to click. Experiment with more "candid" or original photography rather than clinical stock shots.
🔗 Read more: How to delete instagram account on iphone 2018: Why it was actually so hard back then
The landscape of 2026 SEO is intensely visual. Google isn't just a text engine anymore; it's a recommendation engine. If you give it the right "signals"—which in this case means a 1200px wide, 16:9, optimized WebP image—you’re giving your content the best possible chance to explode.