You’ve heard the jokes. The one about the federal worker who could sleep at their desk for a decade and still get a pension? Yeah, that one. It’s a trope for a reason. But if you’re actually sitting in a management chair in a government agency—whether it’s federal, state, or local—the reality of firing a government employee isn’t a punchline. It’s a mountain of paperwork, a legal minefield, and a test of sheer administrative will.
Most people think it’s literally impossible. It’s not. But it’s fundamentally different from the private sector where "at-will" employment lets a boss say, "You’re done," because they didn't like your tie or your attitude. In the public sector, you’re dealing with something called Property Interest.
💡 You might also like: Current USD to KRW Rate: Why the Won is Stubbornly High Right Now
Thanks to the 1985 Supreme Court case Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, a permanent public employee basically "owns" their job. You can’t just take property away without due process. That’s the law. If you skip a step, the employee doesn't just get their job back; they get back pay, and you get a massive headache from the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) or a local civil service commission.
The Reality of the Civil Service Shield
Why is it so hard? Well, the system was designed to stop "spoils." Back in the day, if a new mayor took office, they’d fire everyone and hire their cousins. The Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 changed the game for feds, and most states followed suit. The goal was stability. The side effect? A process so dense it makes managers just give up and "pass the trash," transferring bad employees to other departments instead of doing the hard work of terminating them.
Honestly, the biggest hurdle isn't the law itself. It's the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
In the private sector, a PIP is often just a "goodbye" note in disguise. In government, if you don't give the employee a "bona fide" opportunity to improve, the firing won't stick. We are talking 30, 60, or 90 days of documented weekly meetings, specific metrics, and constant feedback. If a supervisor misses one check-in, the whole case can crumble. It's exhausting. You have to be a detective, a lawyer, and a therapist all at once.
Performance vs. Misconduct
There’s a huge distinction here that many managers trip over.
- Conduct issues are about behavior. Think: hitting a co-worker, stealing a laptop, or lying on a timecard. This is usually faster to handle.
- Performance issues are about the work itself. "Bob just isn't hitting his quotas." This is the slow burn.
For conduct, you use Chapter 75 of the U.S. Code (for feds). For performance, it’s Chapter 43. Mixing these up is the fastest way to lose an appeal. If you fire someone for "poor performance" but your evidence is actually about them being rude to customers, the MSPB might toss the whole thing out because you used the wrong legal authority. It's that picky.
The "Loudermill" Right and Your "Day in Court"
Remember that case I mentioned? It created the Loudermill Hearing.
Before you can officially fire a government employee, you have to give them a "pre-termination hearing." It’s not a full trial with a jury. It’s basically a meeting where you say, "Here is the evidence we have against you," and they get to say, "Here is why you’re wrong."
It’s a check and balance. It feels redundant to managers who have already spent months documenting failures, but it's a constitutional requirement. You’re essentially giving them a chance to tell their side of the story before the paycheck stops. If you don't do this, you've violated the 14th Amendment. No joke.
Documentation is the Only Currency
If it isn't in writing, it never happened.
I’ve seen managers try to fire someone for being "generally lazy." That doesn't work. You need dates. You need timestamps. You need a record of the specific instruction given and the specific failure to follow it.
- June 12: Employee was told to file Report X by 5 PM.
- June 13: Report X was not filed.
- June 14: Meeting held to discuss the delay. Employee claimed they forgot.
You do that for six months. It feels like a second job. And that’s why so many "bad" employees stay. Their bosses are just too busy to do the bookkeeping required to get rid of them.
The "Douglas Factors": The Secret Sauce of Federal Firings
If you are a federal manager, you have to memorize the Douglas Factors. These come from Douglas v. Veterans Administration (1981). There are 12 of them. When you decide to fire someone, you have to prove you considered things like:
- The nature and seriousness of the offense.
- The employee’s past disciplinary record.
- Whether the punishment fits the crime compared to what other employees got for the same thing.
- The employee's potential for rehabilitation.
If you fire "Sarah" for being late three times, but "John" was late ten times and only got a warning, Sarah is going to win her appeal. Consistency is a nightmare in large agencies.
Collective Bargaining and the Union Factor
We can’t talk about firing a government employee without talking about unions. Most public employees are represented. This adds another layer: the Grievance Process.
Unions ensure that the contract is followed to the letter. If the contract says you have to give a verbal warning, then a written warning, then a suspension before firing—and you skip the suspension—the employee is coming back. The union's job isn't necessarily to protect "bad" workers; it's to protect the process. But for a manager, it feels like fighting a war on two fronts.
🔗 Read more: U.S. Bank Recon Line: How to Turn That Rejection Into an Approval
The Cost of a Wrongful Termination
It’s expensive. It’s not just the salary. If a court or board finds the firing was retaliatory—maybe the employee was a whistleblower—the agency could be on the hook for compensatory damages and massive attorney fees. This makes HR departments incredibly risk-averse. They would often rather pay someone to sit in a cubicle and do nothing than risk a $500,000 lawsuit.
Steps to Take if You Are Actually Going to Do It
It’s a marathon. Not a sprint.
First, audit your own house. Check the employee's personnel file. Have they received "Successful" ratings on their performance reviews for the last five years? If so, you can’t suddenly fire them for being incompetent today. You have to "re-baseline" them. You have to tell them, in writing, that the previous ratings were generous and that the standard is now being strictly enforced.
Second, involve General Counsel early. Don't wait until you're ready to hand out the pink slip. You need a lawyer to vet your documentation as you go. They will find the holes in your logic before the employee’s lawyer does.
Third, be human. Even in government, "soft skills" matter. Sometimes, an employee knows they are failing and just wants a way out that doesn't involve a shameful termination. Settlement agreements—where the employee resigns in exchange for the agency dropping the charges—are common. It’s often the best move for everyone.
Actionable Roadmap for Public Sector Managers
- Establish Clear Standards: Don't use vague terms like "be professional." Define it. "Return all emails within 24 hours."
- The Paper Trail: Use a log. Every time there is a missed deadline or a conduct issue, send a "summary of discussion" email to the employee. It serves as an instant record.
- Check for Protected Status: Is the employee a whistleblower? Have they recently filed an EEO complaint? If yes, your documentation needs to be ironclad to prove the firing isn't retaliation.
- The "Notice of Proposed Action": When you finally move to fire, the letter must be incredibly specific. It should cite the rules broken and the evidence gathered.
- The Final Decision: This is usually made by a higher-level official who wasn't involved in the initial "proposal" to fire. This "deciding official" must be impartial.
Firing a government employee is a heavy lift. It’s designed to be. It protects the public service from political whim, but it also creates a system where mediocrity can hide behind procedural walls. To break through, you don't need a sledgehammer; you need a very fine-tipped pen and a lot of patience.
The process is the punishment, they say. But if the goal is a functional, high-performing government, sometimes you have to endure the process to clear the path. Ensure every communication is archived, every "Loudermill" right is respected, and every "Douglas Factor" is weighed. It is the only way to make the decision stick.
Immediate Next Steps
Review the specific "Master Labor Agreement" or Civil Service Rules applicable to your jurisdiction before taking any disciplinary action. Consult with your Labor Relations (LR) specialist to ensure your proposed timeline for a Performance Improvement Plan meets the "meaningful opportunity to improve" standard. Confirm that all previous performance evaluations are consistent with the current disciplinary narrative to avoid "surprise" reversals during an appeal.