You probably remember the box art. A hooded figure, a skull, and a title that felt like a dare. If you grew up in the eighties or nineties, Faces of Death 1978 wasn’t just a movie; it was a rite of passage, a whispered legend passed around on grainy VHS tapes. People swore it was illegal. They swore it was all real. It felt like you were watching something that could get you arrested just for owning it.
Honestly, the reality is a lot weirder than the myth.
The film, directed by John Alan Schwartz (under the pseudonym Conan LeCilaire), was a low-budget shockumentary that basically invented a genre. It claimed to be a serious examination of mortality, hosted by the fictional "pathologist" Dr. Francis B. Gröss. In reality, it was a chaotic mix of genuine newsreel footage and some surprisingly elaborate special effects staged in a backyard. It’s a mess. It’s grisly. And yet, decades later, we’re still talking about it because it tapped into a primal curiosity that the internet eventually turned into a 24/7 reality.
The Big Lie: What Was Real and What Was Fake?
This is what everyone wants to know. When you watch Faces of Death 1978 today, some of it looks laughably bad. But back then, without high-def screens or Google to fact-check every frame, the line between "truth" and "special effects" was incredibly blurry.
The "monkey brains" scene is the one that scarred everyone. You know the one—diners at a fancy restaurant supposedly beating a monkey to death and eating its brains. It looked horrifying. It also happens to be completely fake. The "brains" were actually cauliflower covered in stage blood, and the monkey was a trained animal that was perfectly fine once the cameras stopped rolling. The same goes for the infamous execution in the electric chair. It looks visceral, but if you look closely at the "electricity" effects and the way the foam comes out of the guy's mouth, it’s pure 1970s schlock. Schwartz later admitted they filmed a lot of this stuff in Los Angeles using friends and cheap props.
But then there’s the real stuff.
👉 See also: Don’t Forget Me Little Bessie: Why James Lee Burke’s New Novel Still Matters
That’s where the movie gets genuinely uncomfortable. Schwartz padded the runtime with actual stock footage from news agencies and archives. You’re seeing real plane crashes, real aftermaths of accidents, and real footage from the Holocaust. This jarring jump from "Guy in a Mask" to "Actual Human Tragedy" is why the film feels so slimy. It’s an ethical nightmare. You’re laughing at a poorly acted satanic ritual one minute, and then suddenly, you’re looking at genuine death. That tonal whiplash is exactly why it stayed in people's brains for so long. It didn't feel like a movie; it felt like a mistake you weren't supposed to see.
How a Banned Movie Conquered the Video Store
Marketing is a hell of a drug. The creators of Faces of Death 1978 leaned hard into the "Banned in 40 Countries" tagline. Was it actually banned in forty countries? Probably not. Maybe a handful. But saying it was forbidden made every teenager in America want to find a copy. It became the ultimate "cool kid" currency. If you had the tape, you were the house everyone went to on a Friday night.
It was the original viral content before the internet existed.
Think about the context of the late seventies and early eighties. We didn't have the "gore sites" of the early 2000s or the instant access to tragedy that social media provides now. Information was controlled. Censorship was active. So, when a movie comes along claiming to show the "forbidden" side of existence, it hits like a freight train. It exploited a gap in the market for the macabre that mainstream Hollywood wouldn't touch.
The movie was made for very little money—estimates put it around $450,000—and it went on to gross tens of millions. It wasn't because the filmmaking was good. It wasn't. It was because it felt like a secret. Even the "host," Dr. Francis B. Gröss (played by actor Michael Carr), was designed to give the whole thing a thin veneer of scientific respectability. He sat in a library-like setting, spoke in a monotone, and tried to frame the carnage as a philosophical inquiry. It was a total con, but it worked.
✨ Don't miss: Donnalou Stevens Older Ladies: Why This Viral Anthem Still Hits Different
The Ethical Mess of Faces of Death 1978
Looking back at this film through a 2026 lens is... complicated. We live in an era where "snuff" myths have been debunked a thousand times over, yet we are more surrounded by graphic imagery than ever.
The problem with Faces of Death 1978 isn't just that it lied to its audience. It's the way it commodified real suffering. By mixing fake scenes of animal cruelty (which were still upsettingly realistic) with actual footage of dead human beings, the filmmakers stripped away the dignity of the people in the real clips. They became "content." They became a jump scare for a suburban kid with a VCR.
- The Psychological Impact: Psychologists have often pointed to films like this as the start of a desensitization trend.
- The Legal Fallout: It faced numerous obscenity challenges and helped trigger the "Video Nasty" panic in the UK.
- The Legacy: It spawned numerous sequels, each getting progressively more desperate to shock, until the "Banned From Television" era took over.
There’s a weird irony here. The movie claims to be about "facing death" to understand life better. But by faking the most dramatic parts, it actually does the opposite. It turns death into a carnival attraction. It makes the end of a human life feel like a special effect. That’s the real reason it still feels "dirty" to watch—not because it's scary, but because it's exploitative in a way that feels deeply cynical.
Why We Still Care About This Old Tape
Why are we still talking about a movie where half the scenes are filmed in a kitchen?
Nostalgia is part of it. But more than that, Faces of Death 1978 represents a specific moment in media history. It was the birth of the "mockumentary" horror style, long before The Blair Witch Project or Paranormal Activity made it a billion-dollar trope. It understood that people want to believe what they’re seeing is real, even if their brain tells them it’s not.
🔗 Read more: Donna Summer Endless Summer Greatest Hits: What Most People Get Wrong
It also served as a precursor to the modern "true crime" obsession. We have a dark fascination with the "forbidden." We want to see behind the curtain. Today, that itch is scratched by long-form documentaries on Netflix or deep-dive YouTube essays about serial killers. In 1978, it was a grainy tape of a guy in a smock talking about "the many faces of our demise."
The film's director, Schwartz, eventually came clean about most of the fakes in the late 90s. He seemed almost surprised that people believed so much of it for so long. But that’s the power of suggestion. If you tell someone they are watching something dangerous, their brain will fill in the gaps. They’ll see "real" blood where there’s only corn syrup.
How to Approach Faces of Death Today
If you’re planning on revisiting this relic, go in with your eyes open. It’s a historical curiosity more than a movie. You’re watching the blueprints of modern shock media.
- Check your sources: If a scene looks too "cinematic" (multiple camera angles, perfect lighting), it’s almost certainly fake.
- Context is key: Remember that the "real" footage was often used without permission from families, which is a massive ethical red flag.
- Watch the credits: John Alan Schwartz appears in the movie in various roles (including a leader of a cult)—it’s a family-and-friends production through and through.
The "Mondo" film genre, which this belongs to, has mostly died out because the internet killed the mystery. We don't need a shady VHS tape to see the world's horrors anymore; we just need to refresh a news feed. But Faces of Death 1978 remains the definitive example of how to turn the "unwatchable" into a global phenomenon. It’s a piece of cultural history that proves one thing: humans have always been, and will always be, obsessed with looking at the one thing we’re all afraid of.
If you want to understand the history of horror, you have to understand this tape. Just don’t expect a masterpiece. Expect a weird, gross, often-fake, and strangely fascinating time capsule of an era where a movie could still be a secret.
To really dig into the technical side of how they pulled this off, look up interviews with the makeup artists involved. They used everything from latex to leftover meat from the butcher to create "corpses" that fooled an entire generation. It’s a masterclass in low-budget deception. If you're a film student or a horror buff, that's where the real value lies—not in the shock, but in the craft of the con.
Keep exploring the history of the "Video Nasties" era if you want to see how this one movie actually changed international censorship laws. It’s a rabbit hole that goes way deeper than a single VHS box.