America Has No King: Why We Traded a Crown for a Constitution

America Has No King: Why We Traded a Crown for a Constitution

In the summer of 1787, the humidity in Philadelphia was basically unbearable. Delegates were trapped in a room with the windows shut tight to keep out flies and eavesdroppers, arguing about how to build a country that wouldn't fall apart in ten years. They had a huge problem. They just got done fighting a bloody war to get rid of a king, and now they had to figure out how to lead a nation without creating a new one. The mantra was simple: America has no king. But making that a reality was a nightmare of legal engineering and political ego.

People often forget how close we came to a monarchy. Seriously. There were high-ranking officers in the Continental Army who actually suggested George Washington should just take the crown. They called it the Newburgh Conspiracy. Washington, being the stoic guy he was, basically told them to knock it off. He knew that if he became King George I of America, the whole revolution was a waste of time. He chose to walk away. That single act—resigning his commission—is arguably the most important moment in American history. It set the precedent that the law is higher than any person.

The Rule of Law vs. The Rule of Man

The whole idea that America has no king isn't just a catchy slogan for a bumper sticker. It’s a legal principle called the "rule of law." In a monarchy, the king is the law. Rex Lex. In a constitutional republic, the law is king. Lex Rex. It’s a subtle flip of words that changes everything about how you live your life. It means the President can’t just decide to throw you in jail because you made a joke about his hair. It means there are rules that even the most powerful person in the world has to follow.

Think about the Magna Carta for a second. That was the start of this whole mess way back in 1215. English barons forced King John to admit he wasn't God. Fast forward a few hundred years, and the American Founders took that seed of an idea and turned it into a full-blown system of checks and balances. They were obsessed with the Roman Republic and how it collapsed into an Empire under Caesar. They were terrified of "executive tyranny."

So, they split the government into three pieces. It’s kinda like a game of rock-paper-scissors but with way more paperwork. The President (Executive) can sign laws, but Congress (Legislative) has to write them and fund them. And the Supreme Court (Judicial) can look at both of them and say, "Nope, that’s not allowed." This friction is intentional. The system is designed to be slow and annoying because fast government is usually a government that’s trampling on someone's rights.

Why We Keep Obsessing Over "Strongmen"

Despite the fact that America has no king, we sure do love to act like we want one. Or at least, we treat the President like a celebrity-monarch. Every four years, the media builds up the election like we’re choosing a savior who can fix the economy, stop wars, and lower the price of eggs with a magic wand.

But the Constitution doesn't give the President that kind of power. Not even close.

James Madison, who was basically the lead architect of the Constitution, wrote in Federalist No. 51 that "ambition must be made to counteract ambition." He knew humans were flawed. He knew we’d eventually try to elect someone who wanted to be a king. So he built a "machine that would go of itself." Even if a would-be dictator gets into the Oval Office, they find themselves tangled in a web of bureaucracy, court injunctions, and a Congress that guards its own power like a hawk.

👉 See also: The New York City Newspaper: What Most People Get Wrong About Survival in the Digital Age

It’s messy. It’s frustrating. It’s exactly what the Founders intended.

The Real Power is With the People (Honestly)

If America has no king, then who’s in charge?

The short answer: you. The long answer: a complex network of 330 million people, local city councils, state governors, and federal agencies. This is what we call "popular sovereignty." It means the government’s permission to exist comes from us. When we stop believing in the system, the system stops working.

There’s a famous story about Benjamin Franklin walking out of Independence Hall. A woman asked him, "Well, Doctor, what have we got—a Republic or a Monarchy?" Franklin replied, "A Republic, if you can keep it."

He wasn't being dramatic. Keeping a republic is hard work. It requires people to pay attention, to vote, and to understand that the President is a public servant, not a ruler. We’ve seen moments in history where this was tested. Think about the Watergate scandal. Richard Nixon famously told David Frost, "When the President does it, that means that it is not illegal."

The American system replied with a very loud "Wrong." Nixon had to resign because, again, America has no king. The law applied to him just as much as it applies to a guy getting a speeding ticket in Des Moines.

Modern Challenges to the Crown-less System

Today, things feel a bit different. We have executive orders that seem to bypass Congress. We have a polarized Supreme Court. Some people worry that the "imperial presidency" is back.

  • Executive Orders: Presidents use these to get things done when Congress is stuck in gridlock.
  • Emergency Powers: There are laws on the books that give the President massive control during a crisis.
  • The Bully Pulpit: The ability to talk directly to millions via social media gives a President more cultural power than a 19th-century king could ever dream of.

But even with these tools, the core structure remains. Courts still strike down executive orders. Congress still holds the power of the purse. The military takes an oath to the Constitution, not to a person. That’s a huge distinction. In many countries, the army belongs to the leader. In the U.S., the army belongs to the law.

How to Live in a Country Without a King

So, what does this mean for you on a Tuesday morning? It means your voice actually carries weight, but only if you use it. If you're feeling like the government is getting too "king-like," there are actual steps you can take to reinforce the republican (small 'r') nature of the country.

📖 Related: That Wreck on 40 West Today: What You Need to Know Before Heading Out

  1. Focus on Local Governance: The Founders intended for most of your life to be governed by your state and city, not Washington D.C. Your local school board has more impact on your daily life than the President does.
  2. Support Independent Media: A free press is the only way to catch a "king" in the making. If the government controls the information, they control the people.
  3. Learn the Constitution: You can’t defend rights you don’t know you have. Read the Bill of Rights. It’s shorter than most Terms of Service agreements you click "accept" on every day.
  4. Demand Accountability: Hold your representatives' feet to the fire. Remind them that they work for you. Use those town halls. Send those emails.

The fact that America has no king is a miracle of political science. It’s a fragile, beautiful, loud, and often annoying experiment that has lasted over 200 years. It’s not perfect—far from it. But the alternative is a system where one person’s whim is everyone’s reality. By understanding the limits of power and the importance of the rule of law, we ensure that the crown stays in the history books and off the heads of our leaders.

Keep the "king" out of the White House by being an active, informed citizen. That’s the only way the experiment continues.