Wait, did that actually happen? People are scrolling through their feeds asking if Donald Trump really thinks his successor is a literal machine. It sounds like something out of a low-budget sci-fi flick or a late-night Reddit rabbit hole, but in June 2025, the internet nearly broke when the story hit.
Politics is weird. We know this. But the "robot" thing took it to a whole new level of "what did I just read?"
Basically, it all started on Truth Social. Trump didn't write a long manifesto about circuits and wires. Instead, he did what he often does—he hit the "repost" button on something someone else said. That "something" was a wild theory claiming Joe Biden died years ago and was replaced by a "robotic engineered" entity. Yeah. Seriously.
Why the "Trump says Biden is a robot" story took off
To understand why this exploded, you have to look at the timing. It wasn't just a random Tuesday. The post appeared right as headlines were swirling about Biden’s health—specifically, news regarding a stage 4 prostate cancer diagnosis that had the public on edge.
When people are worried or looking for answers, conspiracy theories grow like weeds. The post Trump shared didn't just stop at "robot." It claimed Biden was "executed in 2020" and that what we see now are "clones, doubles, and robotic engineered soulless, mindless entities."
Trump didn't add a caption. No "look at this!" or "wow!" Just a silent repost.
In the world of social media, that's called a "boost." By sharing it with his millions of followers, he gave the idea a massive microphone. Critics called it dangerous disinformation. Supporters often saw it as him "trolling" the media or highlighting what they perceived as Biden's cognitive decline.
📖 Related: Snow This Weekend Boston: Why the Forecast Is Making Meteorologists Nervous
The actual text of the post
The original account that posted the theory was a small one, the kind that usually lives in the far corners of the MAGA-verse. It said:
"There is no Joe Biden – executed in 2020. Biden clones, doubles and robotic engineered soulless, mindless entities are what you see."
It ended with a jab at Democrats, saying they "don’t know the difference." Honestly, it’s the kind of stuff you’d expect to find on an old-school paranormal message board, not a former (and current) president’s feed.
Is there any evidence? (Spoiler: No)
Let's be real for a second. If you're looking for a smoking gun that the President of the United States is a cyborg, you're going to be looking for a long time.
Fact-checkers from every major outlet—NBC, Fox News, the AP—immediately jumped on this. There is zero proof Joe Biden was "executed" in 2020. We’ve seen him in person, at debates, at the G7 summit, and during daily White House briefings. While his verbal stumbles and slower gait have been a massive talking point for his opponents, equating a 80-plus-year-old man's aging process to "robotic engineering" is a massive leap into the deep end.
Expert medical analysts, like those interviewed by The Guardian and The New York Times, have consistently pointed to Biden's age and his lifelong struggle with a stutter as the reason for his gaffes. Not wires. Not AI.
👉 See also: Removing the Department of Education: What Really Happened with the Plan to Shutter the Agency
The Autopen controversy
Interestingly, Trump doubled down on a different "non-human" theory around the same time. He issued a presidential memorandum (since he was back in office or acting with presidential authority in early 2025/late 2024 depending on the specific timeline of the "return") claiming Biden's aides abused the "autopen."
What’s an autopen? It’s a machine that mimics a person's signature. Trump alleged that Biden’s team used this machine to sign thousands of documents because Biden himself wasn't capable. He called it "one of the most dangerous scandals in history."
So, while the "robot" repost was about Biden's literal body, the autopen thing was about the "robotic" way his administration was allegedly being run. It’s all part of the same narrative: the idea that Joe Biden isn't the one actually "there."
Why people believe the "Biden is a robot" theory
Psychology plays a huge role here. When you see a video of a politician looking confused or "freezing" for a few seconds—like the viral clips from the G7 summit in Italy—your brain looks for an explanation.
- Misleading Clips: Many of the "evidence" videos are "cheapfakes." These are real videos cropped or edited to make a person look worse than they are. For example, a video showed Biden turning away from world leaders to talk to "nobody." A wider angle showed he was actually talking to a skydiver who had just landed.
- The "Uncanny Valley": Sometimes, high-definition makeup or specific lighting can make a person look slightly "off" on camera. For conspiracy theorists, this is "proof" of a mask or a robotic double.
- Political Strategy: Trump has a history of using nicknames and exaggerated claims to define his opponents. "Low Energy Jeb," "Crooked Hillary," and now, the implication that Biden is a "mindless entity." It’s an effective, if controversial, way to frame a rival as weak or illegitimate.
The fallout and the investigation
The drama didn't end with a Truth Social post. Trump actually ordered an investigation into Biden's aides. He wanted Attorney General Pam Bondi to look into whether there was a "purposeful shield" protecting the public from the truth about Biden's health.
This move blurred the lines between "internet meme" and "government policy."
✨ Don't miss: Quién ganó para presidente en USA: Lo que realmente pasó y lo que viene ahora
It’s one thing to repost a crazy theory on a Saturday night. It’s another thing to use the Department of Justice to investigate if the previous guy was being "impersonated." The White House, for its part, called these claims "ridiculous and false."
What we can learn from this
The "Trump says Biden is a robot" saga is basically a masterclass in modern political warfare. It’s about more than just a weird theory; it’s about how information—and misinformation—is used to shape how we see leaders.
If you’re trying to navigate this stuff, here’s the reality:
- Check the source: Was the video cropped? Is the "robot" claim coming from a medical professional or a meme account?
- Distinguish between "reposting" and "stating": Trump often shares things without explicitly saying "I believe this." This gives him "plausible deniability."
- Look at the physical evidence: Biden’s cancer diagnosis is real and documented. His age is real. His gaffes are real. But the jump to "robotic clone" is purely speculative.
Next Steps for the Informed Citizen:
Keep an eye on the official reports from the autopen investigation if you’re interested in the legal side of this. More importantly, always look for the "full frame" of viral videos. Most "robot" evidence disappears when you see the 10 seconds of footage before and after the clip in question. Use sites like FactCheck.org or Snopes to see if a specific "clone" video has already been debunked before you share it.
The 2024-2025 political cycle showed us that the line between "online rumor" and "national news" has basically vanished. Staying skeptical is the only way to stay sane.