He wears his underwear on the outside and carries the weight of the world on his shoulders. Honestly, it’s a miracle the character survived the 1940s. But here we are in 2026, and the obsession hasn't faded. If anything, with James Gunn’s recent reboot finally settling into the cultural zeitgeist, the conversation around all of the superman movies has shifted from nostalgic pining to genuine curiosity about what makes this guy work.
Superman isn't just a hero. He's a barometer for how we feel about ourselves. When we’re optimistic, he’s a bright beacon in primary colors. When we’re cynical, he’s a brooding alien in muted navy. Whether you’re a die-hard Snyderverse defender or someone who still cries when John Williams’ score kicks in, there’s no denying the cinematic journey of Kal-El is one of the weirdest, most triumphant, and occasionally most embarrassing runs in Hollywood history.
The Early Days: More Than Just Black and White
Most people start the clock in 1978. That's a mistake. Before Christopher Reeve ever made us believe a man could fly, Kirk Alyn was doing the heavy lifting in 1940s serials. They were campy. They were cheap. But they laid the groundwork. Then came George Reeves in Superman and the Mole Men (1951). It wasn't exactly a blockbuster, but it served as a back-door pilot for the legendary TV show.
For decades, this was the definitive image of the character. A bit of a "dad" figure. Reliable. Sturdy. He didn't have an existential crisis; he just caught the bad guys and gave a polite nod to the camera.
The Gold Standard: The Reeve Era
Then everything changed. Richard Donner’s Superman: The Movie (1978) basically invented the modern superhero genre. You have to remember, before this, comic book movies were considered "kid stuff." Donner treated it like a period piece. He spent a fortune on the Krypton sets and hired Marlon Brando—at the time the most respected actor on the planet—to play Jor-El.
Christopher Reeve was the magic ingredient. He didn't just play Superman; he played the difference between Superman and Clark Kent. The way he changed his posture, his voice, and even his height just by slouching? That’s acting.
📖 Related: Chris Robinson and The Bold and the Beautiful: What Really Happened to Jack Hamilton
- Superman (1978): The masterpiece. It’s long, it’s earnest, and that helicopter rescue is still one of the best action beats in cinema history.
- Superman II (1980): The one with General Zod. It was a messy production—Donner was fired halfway through and replaced by Richard Lester—but it gave us the "Kneel before Zod" moment. If you can, watch the "Richard Donner Cut" released in 2006; it’s much more cohesive.
- Superman III (1983): This is where things got weird. Richard Pryor was in it for some reason? It’s basically a comedy. There’s a scene where a "bad" Superman fights Clark Kent in a junkyard, which is actually kind of cool, but the rest is a fever dream.
- Superman IV: The Quest for Peace (1987): A disaster. The budget was slashed to almost nothing. You can literally see the wires in the flying scenes. Reeve later said he regretted doing it. It killed the franchise for nearly twenty years.
The Long Limbo and the "Returns"
Hollywood spent the 90s trying to bring him back. We almost got Superman Lives starring Nicolas Cage and directed by Tim Burton. There are pictures online of Cage in a shimmering blue suit that looks like it was made of holiday tinsel. It would have been insane. Instead, we got nothing until 2006.
Bryan Singer’s Superman Returns was a love letter to the Donner films. Brandon Routh looked exactly like Christopher Reeve. The movie was... fine. It was pretty. It was respectful. But it was also boring. There wasn't enough punching. People wanted to see Superman do more than lift a rock made of Kryptonite. It didn't start the fire Warner Bros. was hoping for.
The Man of Steel and the Snyder Era
Zack Snyder decided to blow the whole thing up. Man of Steel (2013) gave us a Superman for a post-9/11 world. Henry Cavill looked like he was carved out of marble. The action was visceral. The destruction of Metropolis was terrifying.
Some fans hated it. They said Superman shouldn't kill (referring to the Zod neck-snap heard 'round the world). Others loved the grounded, "alien first" approach. This led into the polarizing Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) and the chaotic Justice League saga.
Whether you love the "Snyder Cut" or think the whole era was too grim, Cavill remains a fan favorite. He captured the loneliness of being a god among men better than anyone.
👉 See also: Chase From Paw Patrol: Why This German Shepherd Is Actually a Big Deal
The 2025/2026 Shift: James Gunn’s Vision
Which brings us to right now. James Gunn’s Superman (2025) recently hit theaters, and the dust is still settling. It’s a total 180-degree turn from the Snyder years. David Corenswet’s Clark is bright, hopeful, and—believe it or not—actually seems to enjoy being a hero.
It broke domestic records for a solo Superman film, pulling in over $292 million in its first few weeks. People were clearly hungry for a version of the character that didn't feel like he was constantly apologizing for his powers. It’s "comic booky" in the best way. We’re talking bright capes, Krypto the Superdog, and a Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult) who is actually intimidating rather than just twitchy.
A Quick Reality Check on the Timeline
If you're trying to watch all of the superman movies in order, it's not a straight line. You basically have three different "universes" to navigate:
- The Classic Timeline: Superman '78, Superman II, III, and IV.
- The Legacy Path: Superman '78, Superman II, then Superman Returns. (It ignores the bad sequels).
- The DCEU: Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, and both versions of Justice League.
- The New DCU: James Gunn’s 2025 film and the upcoming Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow (2026).
What We Get Wrong About Superman
The biggest complaint about Superman is that he’s "too powerful." People say he’s boring because he can’t be hurt. But they’re looking at the wrong thing. The conflict in the best Superman movies isn't about whether he can survive a bomb; it's about whether he can save everyone. It’s the moral weight.
In Superman (1978), the climax isn't a fistfight; it's Clark trying to be in two places at once to save the woman he loves and the people of California. In the new Gunn film, it’s about navigating a world that has grown cynical and proving that kindness isn't a weakness.
✨ Don't miss: Charlize Theron Sweet November: Why This Panned Rom-Com Became a Cult Favorite
Actionable Insights for the Modern Fan
If you’re looking to dive into the filmography, don’t just watch them all back-to-back. You’ll get whiplash. Start with the 1978 original to understand the DNA of the character. Then jump to Man of Steel to see how that DNA was deconstructed. Finally, catch the David Corenswet version to see how the character is being rebuilt for the future.
Skip Superman IV unless you have a high tolerance for bad 80s special effects and "Plan B" villains like Nuclear Man. Honestly, life is too short for that one.
The real joy of all of the superman movies isn't the spectacle. It’s the evolution. We see a character who started as a social crusader in the 40s, became a god-like icon in the 70s, a misunderstood alien in the 2010s, and now, a symbol of hope again in 2026. He keeps coming back because we need to believe that someone with all the power in the world would choose to be the nicest guy in the room.
To truly appreciate the current state of the DCU, look for the upcoming 4K restoration of the "Donner Cut" of Superman II, which is rumored to include previously unreleased footage of Brando. Comparing that classic footage to the high-intensity VFX of the David Corenswet era provides the best perspective on how far the Man of Tomorrow has actually come.