It was weird.
That’s basically the simplest way to describe the cultural earthquake that happened when Tim Burton and Disney decided to tackle Alice in Wonderland with Johnny Depp. Back in 2010, the hype was honestly suffocating. You couldn't walk into a mall without seeing those neon-pink Cheshire Cat shirts or Depp’s pale, orange-haired face plastered on every possible surface. It wasn't just a movie; it was a peak "Tumblr-era" aesthetic movement.
But looking back, the film is a strange beast.
Most people remember the billion-dollar box office, but they forget how much critics actually hated it. It currently sits with a pretty mediocre 51% on Rotten Tomatoes. Why the massive gap between the money it made and the way people talk about it now? Well, it’s complicated. The movie wasn't really an adaptation of Lewis Carroll’s book. It was more like a "greatest hits" remix that turned Alice into a Victorian Joan of Arc and the Mad Hatter into the emotional center of the entire universe.
The Johnny Depp Factor: More Than Just a Hat
When people think of Alice in Wonderland with Johnny Depp, they usually think of the makeup first. The huge green eyes. The gap-toothed grin. The wild, frizzy orange hair that supposedly changed color based on his mood.
Depp didn't just show up and put on a hat. He actually did a ton of research into "hatters" of the nineteenth century. He found out that many of them suffered from mercury poisoning—hence the term "mad as a hatter"—because mercury was used in the felt-curing process. This wasn't just a quirky acting choice. Depp specifically used that medical history to justify the character's skin tone and the erratic shifts in his personality. One minute he’s a charming host; the next, he’s speaking in a thick Scottish brogue and simmering with legitimate rage.
Some fans loved it. Others? Not so much.
They felt it took the "wonder" out of Wonderland. In the original books, the Hatter is just a bizarre guy stuck in a time loop at a tea party. In Burton's version, he’s a tragic resistance fighter with a heavy backstory. It changed the vibe. It turned a whimsical logic puzzle into a high-stakes fantasy epic, which felt a lot like The Lord of the Rings but with more glitter and tea.
Visually Stunning or Just Too Much CGI?
Tim Burton has a "look." You know it when you see it. Stripes, swirling curls, dark shadows, and pale faces. When he took on Underland—which is what they called Wonderland in this version—he went all-in on digital effects.
👉 See also: Christopher McDonald in Lemonade Mouth: Why This Villain Still Works
This was the post-Avatar era.
Every studio wanted 3D spectacle. This led to some truly iconic imagery, like the Red Queen’s oversized head (played by Helena Bonham Carter) or the smoky, floating Cheshire Cat. But honestly, if you watch it today, some of that 2010 CGI feels a bit... crunchy. It lacks the tactile, handmade feel of Burton’s earlier stuff like Beetlejuice or Edward Scissorhands.
The production design by Robert Stromberg was undeniably ambitious. He won an Oscar for it, actually. He created a world that felt decayed and beautiful at the same time. Giant mushrooms, twisted trees, and the Red Queen's castle that looked like it was made of bleeding hearts. It was a visual feast, but some critics, like the legendary Roger Ebert, felt the darkness of the visuals actually sucked the life out of the story. Ebert gave it two stars, complaining that it lacked the "lightheartedness" of the source material.
The Linda Woolverton Script and the "Alice as Warrior" Trope
The story doesn't follow the 19-year-old Alice Kingsleigh because she's curious. She's there because she’s a "Chosen One."
Screenwriter Linda Woolverton, who also wrote Beauty and the Beast, wanted to give Alice agency. In this version, Alice (Mia Wasikowska) returns to Wonderland as an adult to escape a boring marriage proposal. She finds out there’s a prophecy—the Oraculum—that says she has to slay the Jabberwocky on the Frabjous Day.
This was a massive departure.
- Alice isn't just a witness to nonsense anymore; she's a soldier.
- The conflict is a literal war between the Red Queen and the White Queen (Anne Hathaway).
- The nonsensical nature of the book is replaced by a standard "save the kingdom" plot.
Wasikowska played Alice with a sort of quiet, steely resolve that worked for the "warrior" angle, but it made her feel very distant from the little girl who just wanted to follow a rabbit. This change is probably the biggest sticking point for literary purists. They argue that by making Wonderland a place with rules and battles, you've killed the very thing that makes it Wonderland.
The Supporting Cast: The Real MVPs
While everyone talks about Alice in Wonderland with Johnny Depp, the supporting cast basically carried the movie on their backs.
✨ Don't miss: Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne: Why His Performance Still Holds Up in 2026
Helena Bonham Carter as Iracebeth (the Red Queen) was a stroke of genius. She wasn't just a villain; she was a petulant toddler with absolute power. "Off with their heads!" wasn't a political statement; it was a tantrum. Then you had Anne Hathaway’s White Queen, who walked with her hands up like she was constantly trying to avoid touching anything dirty. She was "good," but in a way that felt slightly creepy and performative.
And we can't forget the voices.
- Alan Rickman as Absolem the Caterpillar (his final voice role before he passed was for the sequel).
- Stephen Fry as the Cheshire Cat.
- Michael Sheen as the White Rabbit.
These actors grounded the CGI characters. They gave them a weight that the pixels alone couldn't provide.
Why it Made $1 Billion Despite the Mixed Reviews
Money talks.
The film was a massive, gargantuan success. It was only the sixth movie in history to cross the billion-dollar mark. Why did it happen?
Timing. It came out in March 2010, right when 3D was the biggest selling point in cinema. People were desperate for another "immersive" experience after Avatar. Also, the brand recognition was off the charts. Combining Disney’s most famous IP with the star power of Johnny Depp at the height of his Pirates of the Caribbean fame was basically a license to print money.
The marketing was also brilliant. They leaned into the "Alice in Wonderland with Johnny Depp" angle so hard that it became the definitive version for a whole new generation. If you ask a teenager today who the Mad Hatter is, they aren't thinking of the 1951 cartoon. They're thinking of Depp’s Futterwacken dance.
Speaking of the Futterwacken... yeah. That happened. It was a breakdance routine at the end of the movie that many people cite as the exact moment the film "jumped the shark." Even the most die-hard fans usually admit that was a bit much.
🔗 Read more: Chris Robinson and The Bold and the Beautiful: What Really Happened to Jack Hamilton
Lessons from the Looking Glass
If you’re planning on revisiting this movie or if you're a filmmaker looking at how to adapt a classic, there are some pretty clear takeaways here.
First, star power matters, but it can overshadow the story. Alice in Wonderland with Johnny Depp eventually became "The Mad Hatter Movie," which shifted the balance of the narrative. Second, CGI is a tool, not a replacement for a soul. The parts of the movie that work best are the character interactions, not the massive green-screen battles.
Finally, nostalgia is a powerful drug. Even though the movie has flaws, people still love it because it represents a very specific era of filmmaking. It was bold, it was weird, and it didn't care about being "grounded."
How to Experience the Best of This Version
If you want to dive back into this world without just sitting through the movie again, there are better ways to do it.
The Colleen Atwood costumes are genuinely world-class. If you ever have the chance to see them in an exhibit, do it. The level of detail in the embroidery of Alice’s "Um" dress or the Hatter's bandolier of thread spools is insane.
Also, listen to the soundtrack. Danny Elfman’s score is one of his best. It’s haunting, whimsical, and grand. It captures the "Alice" feeling better than almost anything else in the production.
If you're looking for a deeper dive into the lore, skip the 2016 sequel, Alice Through the Looking Glass, and instead look up the "Art of Alice in Wonderland" books. They show the incredible concept art that didn't always make it to the screen perfectly but shows the true vision Burton had for the project.
Underland might be a confusing place, but it's never boring.
Next Steps for Fans and Researchers:
- Compare the Text: Read the "Jabberwocky" poem from Through the Looking-Glass and then re-watch the final battle. It’s fascinating to see how they turned a nonsense poem into a literal action sequence.
- Analyze the Costumes: Look up Colleen Atwood’s design sketches. Notice how the fabrics change as Alice grows and shrinks throughout the film.
- Explore the Mercury Theory: Research the "Danbury Shakes" and the history of 19th-century hat making to see just how accurate Depp’s portrayal of mercury poisoning actually was.
- Watch the 1951 Version: Contrast the "Chosen One" narrative of the 2010 film with the pure, chaotic episodic nature of the Disney animated classic. It’s a masterclass in how storytelling trends change over 60 years.