You’re sitting across from someone in a boardroom, or maybe just arguing over who has to do the dishes. In your head, there is a pie. If they get a bigger slice, yours gets smaller. That is the fundamental, gut-level logic of a zero sum and non zero sum game, and honestly, most of us are hardwired to think everything is zero sum. We think for me to win, you have to lose. But that’s a trap. It's a mental model that works for poker but absolutely wrecks businesses, marriages, and international trade.
John von Neumann and Oskar Morgenstern basically birthed this whole field of study back in 1944 with Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. They weren't just talking about bridge or chess. They were looking at the very fabric of how humans interact.
A zero sum game is a closed system. The total gains minus the total losses equals zero. If I take $100 from your pocket, I’m +$100 and you’re -$100. Sum? Zero. But a non zero sum game? That’s where the magic (or the catastrophe) happens. In those scenarios, the total can increase or decrease. We can both win, or we can both go down in flames.
The Brutal Simplicity of the Zero Sum Mindset
Let's look at gambling. When you sit down at a craps table in Vegas, you are in a zero sum environment. The house wins what you lose (minus their edge, which makes it even worse for you). There is no "wealth creation" at a blackjack table. It's just a redistribution of existing capital.
Many people view the corporate world this way. They see a promotion as a zero sum game. "If Sarah gets the VP role, I don’t." On a micro level, that’s true. There is only one seat. But if you zoom out, the company’s growth isn't fixed. If Sarah is a genius who doubles the company's valuation, five more VP roles might be created next year. Suddenly, the game wasn't zero sum at all. It was expansive.
Sports are the ultimate cultural anchor for zero sum thinking. The Super Bowl has one winner and one loser. The scoreboard is the final arbiter. Because we spend so much of our childhood obsessed with sports, we try to apply that "win-loss" binary to things that are way more complex, like salary negotiations or divorce settlements.
It’s easy to understand. It’s "us versus them." It’s tribal. But it’s also incredibly limiting.
Where Non Zero Sum Games Change the World
Robert Wright wrote a book called Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny, and it’s a heavy hitter if you want to understand why civilizations actually succeed. He argues that as history progresses, we become more "interdependent."
Trade is the classic non zero sum game. If I’m great at making shoes and you’re great at growing wheat, and we trade, we are both better off than we were before. I have bread; you have shoes. No one lost. The "total utility" of the world just went up. This is what economists call a "positive sum" outcome.
But there’s a dark side: "negative sum" games.
War is the most obvious example. Even the "winner" of a modern war usually ends up with a shattered economy, lost lives, and destroyed infrastructure. The total value of the system decreases. Everyone loses, just some lose more than others. Understanding the zero sum and non zero sum game distinction helps you realize that avoiding negative sum traps is just as important as finding positive sum opportunities.
The Prisoner's Dilemma: A Quick Reality Check
You've probably heard of the Prisoner's Dilemma. Two suspects are arrested. If they both stay quiet, they get a light sentence (positive sum for them). If one snitches and the other stays quiet, the snitch goes free and the "sucker" gets 10 years (zero sum for the snitch). If they both snitch, they both get 5 years (negative sum).
Logic says you should snitch to protect yourself. But if both people follow that "rational" path, they end up in a worse position than if they had just cooperated. This is why trust is literally an economic lubricant. Without trust, you’re stuck in a cycle of zero sum defensiveness.
Why Your Brain Prefers Zero Sum Logic (and Why It’s Wrong)
Evolution didn't prepare us for globalized digital economies. For 99% of human history, we lived in small tribes where resources—like a dead mammoth or a berry bush—were finite. If the tribe over the hill ate the berries, your kids starved. In that world, zero sum thinking wasn't a "bias"; it was a survival strategy.
Today, we live in an information economy. Information is the ultimate non zero sum resource. If I share a piece of software with you, I still have the software. We both have it. The value has doubled, but the cost hasn't.
Yet, we still see "zero sum" behavior everywhere:
- Status Anxiety: Status is inherently zero sum. You can't be "the most popular" unless others are less popular.
- Fixed-Pie Bias: The belief that there is a set amount of wealth in the world. This is why people hate billionaires regardless of whether those billionaires created new value or just extracted it.
- Office Politics: Sabotaging a colleague because you think their success makes you look bad.
Real experts in game theory, like Thomas Schelling, pointed out that most "conflicts" are actually "mixed-motive" games. You want to beat your competitor, but you both want the industry to stay regulated and profitable. You’re playing two games at once.
Identifying the Game in Your Own Life
How do you know which one you’re playing?
Ask yourself: "Does my success require their failure?"
📖 Related: 401k penalty early withdrawal: Why It Costs Way More Than You Think
If you're a lawyer billing hours, it’s mostly zero sum. There are only 24 hours in a day. If you want more money, you either charge more (taking more from the client) or work more.
If you're a founder building a product that saves people time, you’re playing a non zero sum game. You get rich because you made thousands of people's lives slightly more efficient. You created value out of thin air.
The most successful people in history—the ones who stay successful—tend to be "long-term greedy." They realize that by making everyone else win, they ensure their own win is sustainable. This is the "Iterated Prisoner’s Dilemma." If you play the game once, it pays to be a jerk. If you play the game 100 times with the same person, it pays to be a partner.
How to Pivot to Positive Sum
It’s not just "being nice." It’s strategy.
- Information Transparency: In a zero sum game, you hide information. In a non zero sum game, you share it to build trust and find synergies.
- Equity over Fees: Fees are zero sum. Equity (ownership in a growing pie) is positive sum.
- Selective Competition: Compete on execution, but cooperate on standards. Even Apple and Samsung, who sue each other constantly, have "co-opetition" where one makes the screens for the other's phones.
Navigating the Friction
It's important to acknowledge that not everything can be "win-win." Some things are just hard. Budgeting is often zero sum. If $10,000 goes to marketing, it can't go to R&D. Pretending a zero sum situation is non zero sum is called "toxic positivity," and it leads to bad math and failed businesses.
The trick is to use the right tool for the right job. Use your zero sum skills (negotiation, boundary setting, protection) when resources are truly finite. Use your non zero sum skills (collaboration, innovation, trust-building) when you’re trying to build something new.
Actionable Steps for Game Mastery
Stop looking at the scoreboard and start looking at the system.
- Audit your relationships: Identify which ones feel like a "tug of war" (zero sum). Can you change the incentives to make it a partnership?
- Identify "Fixed Pie" Language: Listen for phrases like "taking a bigger piece" or "at their expense." Challenge yourself to ask, "How do we make the pie bigger?"
- Study Network Effects: Understand that in the modern world, the value of a network increases exponentially with each new user (Metcalfe’s Law). This is the ultimate non zero sum engine.
- Practice Reciprocity: Start with a small "gift" of value—information, an intro, a compliment—with no strings attached. See if the other person responds in kind. If they do, you’ve just started a positive sum loop.
The world is moving away from the era of pure extraction and toward an era of complex coordination. If you're still stuck in a zero sum mindset, you’re playing a losing hand in a game that has already changed. Look for the "hidden" third option where everyone walks away with more than they started with. That is where wealth, influence, and actual progress live.
Focus on the Iterated Game. Don't win the battle today just to lose the war tomorrow. Align your incentives with the people around you, and you'll find that the "pie" was never actually fixed in the first place.