Imagine you’re on a bus. It’s a normal Tuesday. Then, three guys with guns walk on. They want your wallet, your phone, and maybe they want to hurt you just for the hell of it. Suddenly, someone fights back. Not just fights back—they kill the robbers. Silence. Now you’re sitting there with a dead body at your feet and a choice to make. Do you call the cops? Or do you protect the person who just saved your life? That’s the core of You Would Do It Too (Tú también lo harías), the Spanish thriller that’s been lighting up Netflix and making everyone question their own shaky moral compass.
It’s a brutal premise.
The show, created by David Victori and Jordi Vallejo, isn't just another police procedural. It’s a psychological trap. It’s designed to make you feel uncomfortable because, deep down, you know the title is a dare. It’s telling you that under the right pressure, you’d become a liar too.
The Bus Robbery That Started Everything
The story kicks off with a triple homicide on a bus connecting Barcelona’s airport to nearby towns. Three robbers are dead. The passengers? They all have the exact same story. They claim a mysterious "superhero" type—a stranger who wasn’t even on the passenger list—jumped in, took down the bad guys, and vanished into the night.
Detectives Fran Garza and Rebeca Quirós aren’t buying it. They smell a cover-up.
What makes You Would Do It Too so gripping is how it handles the "Rashomon effect." You see the same event through different eyes, but unlike classic noir, the discrepancies aren't just about bad memory. They’re about a pact. Six strangers deciding in a split second that the law doesn't matter as much as gratitude. It’s messy. It’s sweaty. Honestly, it feels way more realistic than your average Hollywood action flick where the witnesses are just plot devices.
Why We Root for the "Vigilante"
There’s a reason this show is trending. We live in a world where people feel like the system is broken. When the characters in the show decide to protect the killer, they aren't just being nice. They are making a political statement. They’re saying that the police weren't there when the guns were pointed at their heads, so the police don't get to decide what happens next.
🔗 Read more: Blink-182 Mark Hoppus: What Most People Get Wrong About His 2026 Comeback
It’s dark stuff.
You’ve got a cast that sells this desperation perfectly. Ana Polvorosa and Pablo Molinero play the detectives with this exhausted, cynical energy. They aren't "super cops." They're people doing a job, trying to find the truth in a city that's decided the truth isn't worth telling. The tension between the detectives is almost as thick as the tension in the interrogation room. Rebeca is impulsive. Fran is more measured. Both are deeply frustrated by a public that has turned the bus killer into a folk hero on social media.
Social media plays a huge role here. In the show, the hashtag #TúTambiénLoHarías starts trending immediately. It mirrors exactly what happens in real life when a "subway vigilante" or a shopkeeper fights back. The internet doesn't wait for a trial. It decides immediately who the hero is.
The Moral Gray Area is the Point
Most TV shows want to give you a "good guy." This one doesn't. Every single passenger on that bus is hiding something. One is worried about their immigration status. Another has a criminal record. Someone else is just plain terrified. Their silence isn't just about loyalty to the "hero"—it’s about self-preservation.
Think about the psychology of a pact. If one person breaks, they all go down for obstruction of justice. It’s a high-stakes version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma.
The pacing is frantic. The episodes are short, usually around 30 minutes, which makes the whole thing feel like a fever dream. You don't get time to breathe. Just when you think you’ve figured out who pulled the trigger, the show throws a wrench in the gears. It forces you to look at the detectives and wonder: are they actually the "bad guys" for trying to solve a murder? Is it murder if the people who died were trying to kill you?
💡 You might also like: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
Production Values and the Spanish Thriller Wave
Spain has been killing it lately with high-concept thrillers. From Money Heist to The Innocent, they’ve mastered the art of the "hook." You Would Do It Too follows that lineage but feels more grounded. The cinematography is gritty. It uses a lot of handheld camera work that makes you feel like you’re trapped in that bus with them. The lighting is harsh. It’s not a "pretty" show, and that’s a compliment.
David Victori, the director, previously worked on Sky Rojo and Cross the Line. He knows how to move a camera to create anxiety. In this show, he uses close-ups to catch every twitch and bead of sweat on the actors' faces. You can see the moment a character decides to lie. It’s subtle, then it’s explosive.
Breaking Down the Cast Performances
- Ana Polvorosa (Rebeca): She’s the heart of the investigation. Her frustration is palpable. She represents the "rule of law," and seeing that law fail in the face of public opinion clearly eats her alive.
- Pablo Molinero (Fran): He provides the cynical counterpoint. He’s seen it all before, but even he is shocked by the solidarity of the passengers.
- The Passengers: I won't list them all to avoid spoilers, but the ensemble work is incredible. They don't feel like actors; they feel like people you’d actually see on a public bus in Barcelona.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Ending
Without spoiling the specifics, a lot of viewers go into the finale expecting a neat bow. They want a "who-dun-it" reveal that solves everything. But that’s not what this show is. You Would Do It Too is more concerned with the "why" and the "what happens to our souls afterward."
The ending is divisive. Some people hate it because it’s not cathartic. I’d argue it’s the only way the show could have ended. If they gave you a simple hero/villain resolution, it would betray the previous episodes. The show wants you to walk away feeling a bit greasy. It wants you to argue with your friends about what you would have done.
Honestly, most of us like to think we’d be the hero. Or at least the person who tells the truth. But when you’re staring down a prison sentence for a stranger who saved your life? You’d probably lie. You would do it too.
Real-World Context: The Vigilante Myth
The show taps into a very real phenomenon. Look at the Bernard Goetz case in New York in the 80s, or more recent incidents in subways and convenience stores. There is a deep-seated human desire to see "bad people" get what’s coming to them, outside the slow and often disappointing legal system.
📖 Related: Why La Mera Mera Radio is Actually Dominating Local Airwaves Right Now
The writers clearly did their homework on witness psychology. They show how memory isn't a video recorder; it’s a storyteller. When you add collective trauma to that, you get the mess that the detectives have to clean up. The show acknowledges that the "truth" is often just the version of events that the most people agree on.
Actionable Insights for Your Next Binge Watch
If you're going to dive into this, here is how to get the most out of it:
- Watch in the original Spanish: The dubbing is okay, but you lose the raw emotion and the specific cadence of the interrogations. Use subtitles. Trust me.
- Pay attention to the background: The show hides clues in the set design and the subtle interactions between passengers in the flashbacks.
- Binge it fast: Because the episodes are short and the tension is continuous, it’s much better watched over one or two nights rather than spread out. You need to stay in that headspace.
- Question the "Hero": Don't take the passengers' word for it. Keep a skeptical eye on the "vigilante" from the jump. The show is playing with your biases just as much as it’s playing with the detectives'.
You Would Do It Too isn't just a title. It’s a mirror. It’s one of the few shows on streaming right now that actually respects the audience's intelligence enough to leave the big moral questions unanswered. It’s uncomfortable, fast-paced, and deeply human. If you want a thriller that stays with you after the credits roll, this is the one.
The next time you’re on a bus and things go south, you might just find yourself remembering these characters. And you might realize you aren't as certain about your ethics as you thought you were. That’s the power of good storytelling. It makes you a little less sure of yourself.
Next Steps for the Viewer:
- Check the Audio Settings: Ensure your Netflix is set to "Spanish [Original]" with your preferred subtitles to capture the actors' authentic performances.
- Research the "Rashomon Effect": If you enjoyed the multiple-perspective storytelling, look up the 1950 Kurosawa film Rashomon to see where this narrative technique originated.
- Explore the Creators' Work: If the tension gripped you, David Victori’s film Cross the Line (No matarás) offers a similar high-stakes, "ordinary person in an extraordinary situation" vibe.