You probably woke up this morning, checked your phone, and thought you were participating in a market. You weren't. According to Yanis Varoufakis, the former Greek Finance Minister and self-described "libertarian Marxist," you were actually tilling a digital field for a lord who doesn't even pay you. He calls this technofeudalism. It sounds like a sci-fi premise, but he argues it's the cold, hard reality of the 2026 economy.
The basic gist is that capitalism—the system of profits and markets we’ve known for two centuries—is dead. It didn't get murdered by socialists. It was killed by capital itself. Specifically, a mutation he calls "cloud capital."
The Death of the Market
Usually, we think of capitalism as a place where people make stuff, sell it in a market, and pocket the profit. You make a better toaster, you win. But look at Amazon. Amazon isn't a market. It’s a fiefdom.
When you enter Amazon’s website, you’re leaving the capitalist market and entering a space where one man (or his algorithm) decides everything you see. He decides the price. He decides which competitors get buried on page ten. He even takes a cut—often 30% to 40%—from every single "vassal" capitalist trying to sell their goods there. That’s not profit. That’s rent.
Why the "Cloudalist" is the New Lord
In the old days, a feudal lord owned the land. He didn't work it; he just let serfs live there in exchange for a huge chunk of their harvest. Today’s "cloudalists"—the Jeff Bezos and Mark Zuckerbergs of the world—own the digital land.
👉 See also: Getting a music business degree online: What most people get wrong about the industry
- Terrestrial Capital: Think of steam engines, factories, and tractors. This is what we used to call capital.
- Cloud Capital: This is the networked hardware, the AI, and the algorithms. It doesn't just produce things; it modifies your behavior.
Varoufakis argues that cloud capital is a "produced means of behavioral modification." Every time you post on Instagram, review a product, or even just scroll, you are training the algorithm. You are the "cloud serf" providing free labor to increase the value of the lord's estate.
How We Got Here (The $35 Trillion Glitch)
Honestly, this didn't happen by accident. Varoufakis traces the shift back to the 2008 financial crisis. To save the banks, central banks printed a staggering amount of money—roughly $35 trillion across the G7.
Instead of building new factories or raising wages, big corporations used that "cheap money" to buy back their own shares or invest in tech infrastructure. They built the "cloud." While everyone else was dealing with austerity and shrinking paychecks, Big Tech was constructing a digital net that now catches almost every transaction we make.
By the time the pandemic hit, the transition was basically complete. We were all stuck at home, fueling the cloud with our data while the "traditional" capitalists (the ones who actually make shoes or furniture) became desperate vassals to the platform owners just to reach customers.
✨ Don't miss: We Are Legal Revolution: Why the Status Quo is Finally Breaking
The Problem with the Term "Big Tech"
We usually say "Big Tech" like it's just a sector of the economy. Varoufakis says that’s a mistake. It's the whole economy now. Even a "traditional" car company like Volkswagen or Tesla is moving toward this model. They don't just want to sell you a car; they want to charge you a subscription for the software or track your data to sell you insurance. They want to turn a one-time profit into a permanent rent.
Is He Right? The Critics Weigh In
Not everyone is buying the "capitalism is dead" line. You've got plenty of economists who think this is just "monopoly capitalism" on steroids.
- The Monopoly Argument: Some say Amazon is just a really big store. Being a middleman isn't new. Retailers have always squeezed suppliers.
- The Labor Question: Critics argue that "cloud serfdom" is a bit of a stretch. Scrolling TikTok isn't the same as backbreaking labor in a 14th-century field. We get "free" entertainment in exchange for our data, which looks more like a barter than feudalism.
- The Profit vs. Rent Blur: Distinguishing between profit (earned from selling goods) and rent (earned from owning an asset) is notoriously messy in modern accounting.
But Varoufakis doubles down. He argues that the dynamic has shifted. In capitalism, the boss wants you to work more for less. In technofeudalism, the lord doesn't even need to employ you to get rich off you.
What This Means for Your Wallet
If we really are in a technofeudal era, the old rules of "investing in a diversified portfolio" or "supporting local business" might be broken.
🔗 Read more: Oil Market News Today: Why Prices Are Crashing Despite Middle East Chaos
- Political Power is Shifting: Governments can’t really regulate these fiefdoms because the cloudalists own the very infrastructure the government uses to communicate.
- The New Cold War: This isn't just about the US and China. It’s a battle between US cloud capital (Silicon Valley) and Chinese cloud capital (Tencent/Alibaba). Everyone else—Europe, India, Africa—is just a digital territory to be conquered.
- Wealth Inequality: Rent-seeking is naturally more "extractive" than profit-making. It leads to a world where a few people own the "roads" and everyone else pays a toll just to exist.
Actionable Insights: Escaping the Fiefdom
You can't just opt-out of the internet in 2026. That's like trying to live outside the feudal system in 1350—you'd starve. But you can change how you interact with it.
First, recognize the rent. When you buy through a major platform, realize that a "tax" is going to the cloudalist, not the creator. If you can buy directly from a creator’s own website, you’re supporting a capitalist market instead of a feudal rent-collector.
Second, digital identity matters. Varoufakis often points out that we don't own our digital selves. We use "Login with Google" or "Login with Facebook." We are begging a lord to vouch for our identity. Supporting decentralized identity protocols or "sovereign data" initiatives is the modern version of a peasant's revolt.
Finally, rethink "free." If a service is free, you aren't just the product—you're the unpaid worker building the machine that will eventually charge everyone else a rent. Moving to paid, privacy-focused alternatives (like ProtonMail or Signal) helps starve the cloud capital of the data it needs to grow.
Whether you call it technofeudalism or just "really bad capitalism," the power shift is undeniable. We've moved from a world of making things to a world of owning the platforms where things happen. The question is whether we can ever reclaim the "commons," or if we're just waiting for the next software update from our lords.