WYSIWYG: What You See Is What You Get Still Matters More Than You Think

WYSIWYG: What You See Is What You Get Still Matters More Than You Think

You’re staring at a screen. It’s 2:00 AM. You’ve spent the last three hours trying to move a "Contact Us" button three pixels to the left in a WordPress editor, but every time you hit preview, the button teleports to the top of the page. It’s infuriating. This is the exact moment when the meaning of what you see is what you get—or WYSIWYG—becomes the most important concept in your digital life.

We take it for granted now. We assume that if we type a word in bold, it stays bold. If we drag an image to the center, it stays in the center. But it wasn't always this way. Back in the day, if you wanted to write a letter on a computer, you didn't see "Dear Mom" in elegant Times New Roman. You saw something like \bf Dear Mom \rm. You had to be a part-time linguist and a full-time psychic to know what the printer was going to spit out.

The messy birth of the WYSIWYG revolution

The acronym itself—pronounced wiz-ee-wig—sounds like something out of a 1950s sitcom, but its origins are rooted in the high-stakes engineering labs of the 1970s. Specifically, Xerox PARC. Most people think Apple or Microsoft invented the modern interface, but the heavy lifting happened at Xerox.

Butler Lampson and Charles Simonyi (who later went to Microsoft and became the father of Word) worked on a program called Bravo. This was the first true realization of the meaning of what you see is what you get. Before Bravo, there was a massive disconnect between the "input" and the "output."

Imagine trying to paint a portrait while wearing a blindfold, and only being allowed to describe the brushstrokes to an assistant who actually touches the canvas. That was computing in the 60s. Bravo took the blindfold off. It allowed users to manipulate text directly. When you see the term used today, it basically refers to any interface that hides the scary code and replaces it with a visual representation of the final product.

Honestly, the shift was cultural as much as it was technical. It democratized creation. Suddenly, you didn't need a PhD in computer science to format a newsletter for your local gardening club.

Why we still struggle with the "What You Get" part

Here is the dirty secret about the meaning of what you see is what you get: it’s often a lie.

Or at least, a half-truth.

💡 You might also like: Heavy Aircraft Integrated Avionics: Why the Cockpit is Becoming a Giant Smartphone

Have you ever designed a beautiful email in a marketing tool, sent a test to yourself, and realized it looks like a digital car crash on your iPhone? That’s the failure of WYSIWYG. The "What You See" is what the editor shows you. The "What You Get" is what the end-user sees. In a world with four thousand different screen sizes, varying browser engines like Chromium or WebKit, and dark mode settings, the promise of a perfect 1:1 match is kinky at best and impossible at worst.

Modern web builders like Wix, Squarespace, or Webflow try to bridge this gap. They use "live" rendering. But even then, there’s an abstraction layer. Underneath that sleek "drag and drop" interface is a mountain of CSS, HTML, and JavaScript.

The developer's dilemma

Software purists often hate WYSIWYG editors. They call the code "bloated."

Because a visual editor has to account for every possible move a user might make, it generates way more code than a human would write by hand. If I write <h1>Hello</h1> in a text editor, it’s clean. If I use a WYSIWYG editor to make that same "Hello," it might wrap it in three different <div> tags and apply twenty inline styles just to make sure it looks "correct" to the person clicking the buttons.

This leads to slower websites. It leads to "div soup." Yet, for 99% of the population, the trade-off is worth it. Complexity is the enemy of productivity.

The psychology of visual feedback

Why do we crave this? Why does the meaning of what you see is what you get resonate so deeply with the human brain?

It’s about the feedback loop.

📖 Related: Astronauts Stuck in Space: What Really Happens When the Return Flight Gets Cancelled

Human beings are visual creatures. We operate on a system called "direct manipulation." When you pick up a physical coffee mug, your brain calculates the weight and the distance in real-time. You don't type a command into a terminal to lift the cup. WYSIWYG brings that physical intuition to the digital world.

When that feedback loop is broken—when you click "bold" and nothing happens until you hit "save"—it creates cognitive friction. Your brain has to pause. It has to translate the abstract into the concrete. That pause kills flow.

Real-world examples of WYSIWYG today

You see this everywhere, not just in Word docs.

  • Canva: This is probably the modern king of the meaning of what you see is what you get. You move a gold star; the star stays there. You download a PDF, and it looks exactly like the screen.
  • Notion: It’s a hybrid. It uses "slash commands," but the rendering is instantaneous. It feels like you’re building the car while driving it.
  • Game Engines: Tools like Unreal Engine 5 or Unity have moved toward "Real-time" editing. In the old days, you’d build a level, "bake" the lighting for six hours, and then see what it looked like. Now, you move a light source and the shadows dance across the floor immediately.

But there’s a flip side. Sometimes, seeing everything is overwhelming. This is why "Markdown" has become so popular again among writers. Markdown (the stuff with the hashtags and asterisks) is the opposite of WYSIWYG. It’s "What You See Is What You Mean" (WYSIWYM).

In WYSIWYM, you focus on the structure. You don't worry about the font size or the exact shade of blue. You just write. You trust the system to handle the "Get" part later. It's a fascinating regression. We spent decades trying to escape the code, and now many of us are running back to it because the visual editors became too cluttered.

The future of the "See" and the "Get"

We’re entering a weird new era with AI.

Generative AI is changing the meaning of what you see is what you get once again. Now, the input isn't a mouse click or a keyboard shortcut. It’s a prompt. "Make me a website for a pizza shop that looks like it's from the 1990s."

👉 See also: EU DMA Enforcement News Today: Why the "Consent or Pay" Wars Are Just Getting Started

The AI generates the visual. But you didn't "see" it until it was done. This is almost a reversal of the revolution. We are moving back toward a world where we describe what we want (the input) and wait for the result (the output). The difference is that the "assistant" is now an algorithm rather than a human typesetter.

However, the need for a WYSIWYG layer after the AI generates the draft is higher than ever. You still want to be able to click that pizza icon and make it bigger without having to argue with a chatbot about "aspect ratios."

Actionable steps for mastering the visual digital world

If you’re working in any creative or technical field, you have to navigate the tension between visual ease and technical reality. Here is how to handle the meaning of what you see is what you get without losing your mind or your SEO rankings.

Test across multiple "gets" Never assume your screen is the truth. If you’re using a WYSIWYG editor for a website or email, check it on a mobile device, a tablet, and a different browser. The "See" is local; the "Get" is global.

Don't fear the "Source" button Most visual editors have a small button that looks like < >. Click it. Look at the mess underneath. You don't need to be a coder to spot when the editor has accidentally pasted the same paragraph five times inside a hidden tag. Cleaning that up manually can fix weird formatting bugs that the visual editor can't see.

Prioritize accessibility The biggest flaw in the meaning of what you see is what you get is that it ignores people who can't "see." Screen readers don't care if your text is "bright red and 40px." They care if it's an <h1>. When using visual tools, make sure you are still using proper heading hierarchies (H2, H3) rather than just making text big and bold.

Balance "visual" with "structural" For long-form writing or complex data, consider starting in a "distraction-free" or Markdown environment. Get the bones right first. Save the "make it pretty" phase—the WYSIWYG phase—for the very end. This prevents you from wasting four hours on fonts when you haven't even finished the introduction.

The concept of WYSIWYG isn't just a tech term. It’s a promise of transparency. It’s the idea that the interface should get out of the way of the imagination. While the tech will keep evolving, that core desire—to have our digital tools reflect our physical reality—isn't going anywhere. Just remember that what you see on your monitor is only half the story. The other half is what happens when you hit "Publish."