Worst Rated Movies Rotten Tomatoes: Why 0% Still Happens (and What to Watch Instead)

Worst Rated Movies Rotten Tomatoes: Why 0% Still Happens (and What to Watch Instead)

Let's be real: we've all done it. You’re sitting on the couch, remote in hand, scrolling through a streaming service, and you see a movie that looks... fine. Maybe even good. But then you check the phone. You see that little green splat. Not just any splat, though. You see the dreaded 0%.

That zero is a haunting number. It means that out of every single professional critic who bothered to file a review, not one of them found a redeeming quality worth a "fresh" rating. It’s a mathematical miracle of failure. Honestly, it’s almost harder to make a movie that 100% of people hate than it is to make one that everyone loves.

In the world of worst rated movies rotten tomatoes, there's a special kind of infamy reserved for the bottom of the barrel. We aren't just talking about "bad" movies here. We are talking about the ones that broke the system.

The Hall of Zero Percent Shame

You’d think with the sheer volume of movies released every year, the list of 0% movies would be miles long. It’s actually a pretty exclusive club. To stay at zero, you need a decent number of reviews—usually at least 20—and they all have to be negative.

Take Ballistic: Ecks vs. Sever (2002). This is basically the king of the trash heap. It’s a generic action flick starring Antonio Banderas and Lucy Liu. Most movies with a 0% score have maybe 20 or 30 reviews. Ballistic has over 110. Every single one is a pan. Imagine being a director and watching 119 professionals in a row tell you that your work is fundamentally broken. Ouch.

📖 Related: Despicable Me 2 Edith: Why the Middle Child is Secretly the Best Part of the Movie

Then there’s Gotti (2018). John Travolta really went for it here. He wore the suits, did the voice, and the movie still landed a big fat zero. The critics called it a "muddled mess" and "boring." You've probably heard of the "Gotti" effect, where the studio actually tried to use the bad reviews in their marketing, basically telling the audience, "Don't trust the critics!" It didn't work. The movie stayed rotten.

The Weird Ones We Actually Remember

Some of these worst rated movies rotten tomatoes have a weird staying power. They aren't just bad; they're memorable for how they failed.

  • Mac and Me (1988): It’s a 0% movie that is essentially a 90-minute McDonald's commercial featuring a terrifying alien. Paul Rudd has kept this movie alive for decades by playing the same clip every time he goes on a talk show. Without that bit, it would be buried in a desert somewhere.
  • Jaws: The Revenge (1987): The shark follows the family to the Bahamas. Because sharks have vendettas now? Michael Caine famously said he never saw the film, but he saw the house it built, and it was "terrific."
  • The Ridiculous 6 (2015): Adam Sandler’s first big Netflix exclusive. It was a massive hit for the streaming giant in terms of views, but critics absolutely slaughtered it. It’s a reminder that what critics hate, the general public often watches anyway while eating popcorn on a Tuesday night.

How Do Movies Even Get This Low?

It’s usually a perfect storm. Most of the time, a "bad" movie will get a 10% or a 15% because one or two critics will say, "Hey, the cinematography was actually kind of nice," or "The lead actor tried their best."

To hit zero, the movie has to fail on every technical and emotional level. The script has to be nonsensical. The acting has to be wooden. The direction has to be invisible or, worse, incompetent.

👉 See also: Death Wish II: Why This Sleazy Sequel Still Triggers People Today

The Sequels That Nobody Asked For

Sequels are a breeding ground for 0% scores. Staying Alive (1983), the sequel to Saturday Night Fever, is a classic example. Sylvester Stallone directed it. It took the gritty, realistic vibe of the first film and turned it into a weird, neon-soaked Broadway fever dream. Critics weren't just disappointed; they were offended.

Police Academy 4: Citizens on Patrol is another one. By the fourth movie, the joke was so thin you could see through it. David Spade made his film debut in this, which is a fun trivia fact, but even he probably doesn't have it on his "Best Of" reel.

Is the Tomatometer Actually Fair?

There’s a lot of debate about whether the Tomatometer is a good way to judge art. Basically, it’s a binary system. A critic gives a "thumbs up" or a "thumbs down." If 100 critics give a movie a 6/10, that movie gets a 100% Fresh rating. If 100 critics give it a 5/10, it gets a 0%.

That’s a huge gap for a very small difference in opinion.

✨ Don't miss: Dark Reign Fantastic Four: Why This Weirdly Political Comic Still Holds Up

A movie like Problem Child (1990) has a 0% score. But if you grew up in the 90s, you probably loved that movie. It’s mean-spirited and weird, and critics hated the idea of a kid being that "bad," but for audiences, it was just funny. This is where the "Popcornmeter" (the audience score) comes in. Often, you’ll see a 0% critic score paired with a 40% or 50% audience score. People like what they like, and they don't always care about "narrative structure" or "thematic depth."

What We Learned from the Worst of 2025

Even recently, the trend continues. In 2025, we saw movies like The Woman in the Yard struggle to find any critical love. Usually, these modern duds fall into the "formulaic horror" or "tax-write-off action" categories. They are movies made by committees, designed to fill a slot on a release schedule rather than tell a story.

When a movie hits 0% today, it’s often because it feels "soulless." Critics are more forgiving of a movie that tries something bold and fails than they are of a movie that doesn't try anything at all.

Actionable Takeaways for Your Next Movie Night

If you're looking at a movie with a suspiciously low score, here’s how to decide if you should actually hit play:

  • Check the "Average Rating": Underneath the big percentage, there’s a small number like "3.2/10." If that number is higher than the percentage suggests, it means critics were "mixed" rather than "hateful."
  • Look at the Review Count: A 0% with 5 reviews doesn't mean much. A 0% with 80 reviews? Run.
  • Read the Audience Reviews: If the audience score is way higher than the critic score, it might be a "guilty pleasure" movie. It won't win an Oscar, but you might actually have fun.
  • Consider the Genre: Horror and comedy are notoriously hard to score. What makes one person laugh or scream might make a critic roll their eyes.

The reality of worst rated movies rotten tomatoes is that they are often more interesting to talk about than the mediocre movies with 50% scores. There’s a certain fascination in total failure. Whether it’s a shark with a grudge or a dancing alien in a McDonald's, these movies represent the absolute limits of what cinema can be—even if that "limit" is the bottom of the barrel.

Next time you see that green splat, don't just dismiss it. Maybe check out the trailer. You might just find your new favorite "so bad it's good" masterpiece. Or, you know, you might just save yourself two hours of your life. Either way, the zero tells a story.