You’d think losing is easy. It isn't. To be truly, historically awful, a team needs more than just a lack of talent. It needs a perfect storm of bad management, rotten luck, and a total collapse of morale. Honestly, if you’ve watched a lot of baseball, you’ve seen bad teams. But have you seen the 1899 Cleveland Spiders?
They went 20-134.
That’s a .130 winning percentage. Basically, they lost nearly seven games for every one they won. For years, people pointed to the 1962 New York Mets as the gold standard for "modern" futility. Then 2024 happened. The Chicago White Sox didn't just stumble; they plummeted. By the time the dust settled on the 2024 season, we had a new king of modern-era losses.
Understanding the worst mlb records all time requires looking at different eras. You can't really compare a team from the 1800s to a team playing in 2026. The game has changed. The schedule has changed. Even the way we count ties has changed.
The Modern Era Meltdown: 2024 Chicago White Sox
The 2024 Chicago White Sox finished with 121 losses. It was a slow-motion car crash that lasted six months. They officially broke the record previously held by the 1962 Mets, who had "only" lost 120 games.
The Sox started the year 3-22. That’s not a slump. That’s a disaster.
Why the 2024 White Sox Were Historically Bad
It wasn't just one thing. It was everything. Their offense was basically nonexistent for long stretches. At one point, they endured a 21-game losing streak. You read that right. Twenty-one games.
- They ended the season 41-121.
- Their winning percentage sat at .253.
- They were outscored by 306 runs.
While .253 is bad, it’s actually not the worst winning percentage since 1900. That "honor" still belongs to the 1916 Philadelphia Athletics. Those A's went 36-117. Because they played fewer games than the modern 162-game schedule, their winning percentage was a miserable .235.
So, while the White Sox have the most losses, the 1916 A's were technically worse at winning. It’s a subtle distinction, but in the world of baseball nerds, it matters.
The 1962 Mets: Lovable Losers or Just Plain Bad?
For decades, the 1962 New York Mets were the face of the worst mlb records all time. They were an expansion team. They were supposed to be bad. But 40-120-1 was a special kind of bad.
They lost their first nine games of the season. Manager Casey Stengel famously asked, "Can't anybody here play this game?"
The answer was usually no.
The Infamous Tie
One thing people forget is that the '62 Mets had a tie. They went 40-120-1. Because they only played 160 games (two were rained out and never made up), their winning percentage was exactly .250.
Their pitching staff was a horror show. Roger Craig lost 24 games. Al Jackson lost 20. When your two "best" starters combine for 44 losses, you’re not going to the World Series. Yet, weirdly, New York loved them. They were the "Amazin' Mets." Fans actually showed up to watch the carnage.
The Unbeatable Futility of the 1899 Cleveland Spiders
If we’re being honest, no modern team will ever be as bad as the 1899 Cleveland Spiders. Their record of 20-134 is untouchable.
Why? Because the owners literally stole the team’s best players and moved them to St. Louis.
The Robison brothers owned both the Spiders and the St. Louis Browns (now the Cardinals). They realized St. Louis had better attendance. So, they sent Cy Young and every other decent player to St. Louis. They left Cleveland with a roster of "non-entities" and washed-up veterans.
Life on the Road
The Spiders were so bad and drew so few fans that other teams refused to travel to Cleveland. They didn't want to play in an empty stadium for a tiny share of the ticket sales.
As a result, the Spiders played 101 games on the road. They lost 101 games on the road. That is a real stat. They finished 11-101 away from home.
🔗 Read more: Catta Verdera Country Club: Why This Lincoln Landmark is Different
They once lost 24 games in a row. They ended the season losing 40 of their final 41 games. The franchise was dissolved immediately after the season. Good call.
Other Teams That Barely Escaped Infamy
The 2003 Detroit Tigers are often left out of the conversation because they went on a "hot" streak at the very end. They won five of their last six games to finish 43-119. If they had lost those games, they would have finished 38-124, which would have shattered the Mets' record years before the White Sox did.
Then there are the 2025 Colorado Rockies. They just finished a season that saw them lose 119 games. They narrowly avoided the White Sox's 121-loss mark, but their run differential was a staggering -424. That is actually worse than the 1932 Red Sox (-349), making the 2025 Rockies one of the most statistically lopsided teams in over a century.
Ranking the Worst Single Seasons (Modern Era)
When people look up the worst mlb records all time, they usually want the raw numbers. Here is how the modern era (post-1900) shakes out by winning percentage:
- 1916 Philadelphia Athletics: 36-117 (.235)
- 1935 Boston Braves: 38-115 (.248)
- 1962 New York Mets: 40-120 (.250)
- 1904 Washington Senators: 38-113 (.252)
- 2024 Chicago White Sox: 41-121 (.253)
Wait, the White Sox are fifth?
👉 See also: NBA Playoff Stats 2025: What Most People Get Wrong
Yep. Even with 121 losses, their winning percentage is slightly higher than those older teams because they played more games. It’s the paradox of the 162-game schedule. You have more chances to lose, but those 41 wins keep your percentage just high enough to avoid being the "mathematical" worst.
Why Do Teams Get This Bad?
It’s rarely just "not having good players." Most of these teams share three specific traits:
- The "Fire Sale": The 1916 A's were bad because Connie Mack sold off his stars after the 1914 World Series. He couldn't afford them.
- The Expansion Gap: The 1962 Mets were built from the scraps of other teams. The talent pool was spread too thin.
- The Morale Spiral: Once a team loses 15 or 20 in a row, the clubhouse dies. You can see it in the 2024 White Sox. Pitchers start nibbling, hitters start pressing, and managers start looking for the exit.
Actionable Insights for Baseball Fans
If you're tracking these records or betting on the "under" for a struggling team, keep these factors in mind:
- Check the Run Differential: Winning percentage can be lucky. Run differential tells you how bad a team really is. The 2025 Rockies were arguably worse than the 2024 White Sox because they were getting blown out by larger margins.
- Look at Road Records: Bad teams usually collapse on the road. The 1899 Spiders are the extreme example, but even the 2024 White Sox only won 18 road games.
- Post-Trade Deadline Performance: Many modern "worst" records are cemented in August and September. Teams trade away their only remaining assets for prospects, and the final two months become a bloodbath.
The history of baseball isn't just written by the winners. The losers—the 121-loss White Sox, the "Amazin'" Mets, and the nomadic Spiders—give the sport its texture. They remind us that even in a professional league, things can go spectacularly, hilariously wrong.
To dig deeper into the stats of your favorite (or least favorite) struggling team, you can visit the Baseball-Reference Team Encyclopedia to compare era-adjusted metrics.