Let’s be real for a second. Most of the stuff you read about working with other people sounds like it was written by someone who has never actually sat in a middle-management meeting or had to share a Trello board with a "creative visionary" who doesn't believe in deadlines. It's all "synergy" this and "radical candor" that.
But then Monday morning hits.
💡 You might also like: Kachina Air Chapter 11: The Reality of Regional Airline Bankruptcy
You’re staring at an email from Greg in accounting that is so passive-aggressive it deserves a Pulitzer Prize, and suddenly, those five tips for "effective collaboration" feel about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. Collaboration is messy. It’s loud, it’s frustrating, and honestly, it’s where most good ideas go to die if you don't know how to navigate the human ego.
The Myth of the Frictionless Team
We’ve been sold this lie that a good team is a quiet one. If everyone is nodding, you’re winning, right?
Wrong.
In 1965, a psychologist named Bruce Tuckman came up with a model that people still talk about today: Forming, Storming, Norming, and Performing. Most people try to skip the "Storming" part. They want to go straight from meeting each other to being a high-performance engine. But the friction is actually the point. According to a long-term study by Google called Project Aristotle, the secret to the best teams wasn't a lack of conflict or even having the smartest people in the room. It was psychological safety.
That sounds like HR speak, but it basically just means you can mess up without being sacrificed at the next stand-up meeting. If you can’t tell your boss their idea is kinda terrible without fearing for your job, you aren't really working with them. You're just taking orders.
Why "Working With Other People" Is Harder Than It Used To Be
The landscape has shifted. We aren't just hovering over cubicle walls anymore. Now, we’re dealing with the "Digital Fragmentation" of the workplace.
Think about it. You might be working with someone in London while you’re in Chicago. You’re on Slack, they’re on email, and the project manager is obsessed with Asana. Research from the Harvard Business Review suggests that remote and hybrid setups have actually increased "collaborative overload." We spend so much time talking about the work that we never actually do the work.
One person likes direct, blunt feedback. Another person needs a "compliment sandwich" just to get through the day. When you mix these personality types across different time zones and screens, things get weird fast.
The Personality Trap
Everyone loves a good personality test. Myers-Briggs, Enneagram, the one where you're a specific type of bird—it doesn't matter. While these tools can be fun for a team-building retreat, they often become an excuse for bad behavior. "Oh, I’m just an ENTJ, so that’s why I’m steamrolling everyone in the meeting."
That's not how it works.
Real expertise in working with other people comes from cognitive flexibility. It’s the ability to see that your "logical" approach might feel like an attack to someone who prioritizes harmony. Adam Grant, an organizational psychologist at Wharton, often talks about "Givers, Takers, and Matchers." In his research, he found that while Takers might win in the short term, Givers actually dominate the top of the performance ladder—but only if they set boundaries. If you give too much, you just become the office doormat.
How to Handle the "Difficult" Person (Who Is Probably You)
We all think we’re the easy ones to work with. It’s always them. It’s Sarah who misses the Zoom calls. It’s Mike who over-explains things.
But here’s a hard truth: you are someone’s "difficult" person.
Maybe you’re the one who sends 15 separate Slack messages instead of one paragraph. Maybe you’re the one who stays silent in meetings and then complains about the decision later. Improving how you handle working with other people starts with a brutal self-audit.
- The Over-Communicator: You think you’re being helpful. They think you’re a micromanager.
- The Ghost: You think you’re focused. They think you’re unreliable.
- The Yes-Man: You think you’re being agreeable. They think you have no spine.
The most effective way to bridge this gap is what experts call "Meta-Communication." It’s a fancy word for talking about how you talk. Instead of guessing, just ask: "Hey, do you prefer a quick call when I have a question, or should I just batch them into an afternoon email?" It takes ten seconds and saves ten hours of annoyance.
The Cognitive Bias That Ruins Everything
There’s this thing called the Fundamental Attribution Error. It’s a psychological glitch where we judge ourselves by our intentions but judge others by their actions.
If I’m late to a meeting, it’s because traffic was a nightmare and my cat threw up. I’m a good person who had a bad morning.
If you’re late to a meeting, it’s because you’re lazy and don't respect my time.
When you start working with other people through the lens of this bias, everything looks like a personal slight. You stop seeing a teammate and start seeing an obstacle. To break this, you have to actively assume "positive intent." It sounds cheesy, but it’s a tactic used by some of the most successful CEOs, like Indra Nooyi, the former head of PepsiCo. If you assume someone is trying their best, your response changes from an attack to a question.
The Death of the "Meeting"
If you want to kill morale, schedule a meeting that could have been an email.
We’ve all been there. 45 minutes in, someone is still talking about their weekend, and you’re calculating how many actual tasks you could have finished in this time. Effective collaboration isn't about more face time. It's about higher-quality touchpoints.
The most productive groups often use "asynchronous" work patterns. This means you do your deep work alone, and you only come together to make decisions that require collective input. If you're just reporting status updates, you're wasting everyone’s life. Use a document. Use a dashboard. Save the human interaction for the stuff that actually needs a human.
Power Dynamics and the "Loudest Voice" Problem
In almost every group, one person ends up dominating. This isn't always because they have the best ideas; it’s usually because they have the most confidence or the highest title. This is where working with other people becomes a leadership challenge, even if you aren't the "boss."
There’s a technique called "Brainwriting" that actually works better than traditional brainstorming. Instead of shouting out ideas, everyone writes them down silently for five minutes. Then, the ideas are collected and discussed. This levels the playing field. It allows the introverts—who, by the way, often have the most deeply considered ideas—to actually be heard.
Dealing With Hierarchy
Let’s talk about the elephant in the room: the boss.
Working with a supervisor is a specific skill set. It’s not just about doing your job; it’s about "managing up." This doesn't mean brown-nosing. It means understanding what your manager is worried about and solving that problem before they have to ask. If your boss is obsessed with the budget, don't just show them a cool design; show them how that design saves money.
Actionable Steps for Better Collaboration
If you want to actually improve how you work with others tomorrow morning, stop reading the "inspiring" quotes and do these things instead:
- Audit your "Ask" ratio. Are you always the one asking for favors, or are you providing value first?
- Define the "DOR." That’s the Definition of Ready. Don't hand off a task to a teammate until it has everything they need to actually start. Don't be the person who says "Here's that thing" and leaves out the login credentials.
- Use the "24-Hour Rule" for conflict. If an email makes you angry, don't reply for 24 hours. If it still matters tomorrow, address it then. Usually, it won't.
- Kill the "Reply All." Seriously. Only include the people who actually need to see the message. Your coworkers will love you for it.
- State your communication style. Put it in your Slack bio or an email signature. "I'm slow to respond to Slack but quick on email" saves everyone a lot of stress.
- Acknowledge the small wins. If someone did a great job on a spreadsheet, tell them. Not in a "Great job, team!" way, but in a "That VLOOKUP saved me three hours" way. Specificity is the only form of flattery that actually works.
Working with other people is never going to be perfect. Humans are unpredictable, emotional, and sometimes just plain weird. But if you stop trying to find a "system" and start focusing on the actual humans in front of you—with all their flaws and biases—the work gets a whole lot easier.
The goal isn't to eliminate the friction. The goal is to make sure the friction actually produces some heat.