Wait, didn't we just do this? Honestly, it feels like the 2024 election was only five minutes ago, but here we are in 2026, and the chatter about the next cycle is already deafening. If you’ve spent any time on X (formerly Twitter) or caught a clip of a rally lately, you've likely seen the red hats with "2028" emblazoned on them. It raises a massive, slightly terrifying, and legally messy question: will trump be able to run again once this current term wraps up?
The short answer is a hard "no," but the long answer is where things get weird.
Most people point straight to the 22nd Amendment and call it a day. That's the law that says you get two terms and then you're out. Since Donald Trump is currently serving his second term—albeit with a four-year "gap year" in the middle—the math seems simple. Two is two. But in politics, and especially in this administration, "simple" is rarely the vibe.
The Wall of the 22nd Amendment
Let’s look at the actual text because it’s surprisingly blunt. The 22nd Amendment states: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice." It doesn't say "twice in a row." It just says twice. Total.
✨ Don't miss: Judge William G. Young and the Future of the American Jury
This rule exists because of Franklin D. Roosevelt. Before him, everyone just followed George Washington’s lead and quit after eight years. FDR broke that tradition by winning four times. After he died, Congress basically said, "Never again," and ratified this limit in 1951. Since then, it’s been the ultimate ceiling. Reagan couldn't run again. Obama couldn't run again. And technically, Trump shouldn't be able to either.
But here’s the thing. Trump has never been one to let a "standard interpretation" stop him from exploring an idea. During a press conference in early 2025, he even joked—or maybe he wasn't joking—that he’d "love to do it" when asked about 2028. He’s since walked that back a few times, notably telling reporters on Air Force One in October 2025 that he's "not allowed to run," but that hasn't stopped his allies from looking for the "back door."
The "Loophole" Theories (And Why They’re Mostly Junk)
You’ve probably heard some of the "cockamamie schemes," as California Senator Tom Umberg recently called them. Let’s break down the most popular ones that people are whispering about in 2026.
- The Vice President Swap: The idea is that Trump runs as VP on a ticket with someone like JD Vance or Marco Rubio. Then, after the inauguration, the President resigns and Trump moves back into the Oval Office.
- The Speaker Strategy: Trump gets elected to the House (or just appointed Speaker, since you technically don't have to be a member), and then the President and VP both resign.
- The Repeal: A full-blown effort to trash the 22nd Amendment entirely.
Let’s be real: the first two are almost certainly unconstitutional because of the 12th Amendment. It says that anyone who is "constitutionally ineligible" to be President is also ineligible to be Vice President. If the 22nd Amendment says you can't be elected President again, the courts are likely going to say you can't be the "spare" either.
As for the third option? Repealing an amendment is like trying to win a marathon while wearing lead boots. You need two-thirds of both the House and the Senate to agree, and then three-quarters of all the states (that’s 38 states) to ratify it. In today’s hyper-polarized climate, getting 38 states to agree on what color the sky is would be a miracle, let alone giving a president a third term.
The "Non-Consecutive" Resolution
Interestingly, some of Trump's most loyal supporters in Congress haven't given up. In January 2025, Tennessee Representative Andy Ogles introduced a resolution that would allow presidents who served non-consecutive terms to seek a third term.
The logic is basically: "If you had to win twice while being out of power in between, you've proven you're popular enough to keep going."
It’s a clever bit of lawyering because it specifically helps Trump while excluding guys like Bill Clinton, George W. Bush, or Barack Obama (who all served their terms back-to-back). However, experts like Dr. Stephen J. Farnsworth have been pretty vocal that there is "zero chance" of this actually passing. It’s mostly political theater—red meat for the base.
What States are Doing Right Now
While Washington bickers, some states are taking "pre-emptive strikes." Take California, for example. Just a few days ago, on January 13, 2026, California lawmakers started pushing Senate Bill 46.
This bill is designed to "Trump-proof" their 2028 ballot. It would require any presidential candidate to swear under oath that they meet all constitutional requirements. If you've already been elected twice, the California Secretary of State would be legally barred from putting your name on the ballot. It’s a "belt and suspenders" approach to ensure that even if a legal challenge makes it to a friendly Supreme Court, the state-level barriers remain.
🔗 Read more: The Flag Half Staff Inauguration Mystery: What Really Happened
The Real Impact of the "Third Term" Talk
Even if he never actually appears on the 2028 ballot, the constant talk about will trump be able to run again serves a huge political purpose.
- Avoids "Lame Duck" Status: The second a president admits they're finished, they lose power. Everyone starts looking at the next guy. By keeping the 2028 door "slightly ajar," Trump keeps the focus—and the fear—firmly on himself.
- Fundraising: Nothing opens wallets like a "historic" movement to break the status quo.
- Succession Planning: By teasing a run, he can essentially "interview" potential successors like JD Vance or Eric Trump in the public eye.
Honestly, we’re looking at a situation where the law is very clear, but the politics are incredibly murky. Legal scholar Jeremy Paul from Northeastern University has said that any attempt to bypass the 22nd Amendment would be "lawless," but we've seen how much "unprecedented" stuff has happened in the last decade.
What Happens Next?
If you're trying to figure out how this actually plays out over the next two years, keep your eyes on the courts and the primary schedules.
- Watch the State Legislatures: If more blue states follow California's lead with "eligibility oaths," the Republican party will be forced to litigate this early—probably by late 2026 or early 2027.
- Monitor the "Trial Balloons": If Trump starts naming a "2028 ticket" where he is the VP, you know the legal battle is officially on.
- The 2026 Midterms: The results of the upcoming midterms will tell us if there’s actually enough support in Congress to even attempt a constitutional amendment change.
Basically, don't expect this conversation to go away. Even if the law says "no," the movement says "maybe," and in the current American landscape, that’s enough to keep the country on edge for the next 1,000 days.
💡 You might also like: Where Exactly is the Indian Point Nuclear Plant Location and Why Does it Still Matter?
The most likely reality? Trump will spend the next two years hinting at a run to maintain his grip on the GOP, only to eventually "anoint" a successor at the 2028 convention, claiming he’s doing it to "save the Constitution" he’s been accused of wanting to change.
Actionable Next Steps:
- Track State Ballot Laws: Follow your local Secretary of State’s updates on candidate eligibility requirements for the 2028 cycle.
- Read the 12th and 22nd Amendments: Don't rely on pundits; read the primary text to understand why the "VP Loophole" is legally shaky.
- Watch the 2026 Midterm Platforms: See how many candidates are running on a "Term Limit Reform" platform, as this will be the first real indicator of legislative appetite for a change.