You've sat there. Staring at a flickering cursor or a printed bubble sheet, trying to decide if you are "more likely to lead a parade" or "meticulously organize the confetti." It is the classic corporate ritual. We call it the strengths and weaknesses test, but honestly, most of the time, it feels like a personality horoscope with a suit on. People take these tests because they want a map. They want someone to tell them why they are burnt out or why their boss makes them want to scream into a pillow at 3:00 PM on a Tuesday.
But here is the thing: most of these assessments are snapshot tools, not crystal balls. They capture how you feel today, in this office, under this specific amount of pressure.
Most people treat these results like a biological destiny. They get their "Type A" or "Commander" or "Analyst" label and wear it like a shield. "I can't do spreadsheets, I’m a Big Picture Person," they’ll say. That is a trap. A real strengths and weaknesses test shouldn't give you an excuse to stay stagnant; it should be the starting gun for actually getting better at your job.
The Science of Self-Reporting (And Why It Fails)
We have to talk about the "Better-than-Average" effect. Psychologists like David Dunning and Justin Kruger—yeah, the guys behind that famous effect—have shown that we are remarkably bad at judging our own competence. When you take a strengths and weaknesses test, you aren't providing objective data. You are providing your perception of yourself.
If you’ve had a really good week where you crushed a presentation, you’re going to rate your communication skills as a 10. If you just got dumped or your car broke down, you might rate your resilience as a 2.
👉 See also: Florida Housing Market Listings Increase: Why It’s Finally Happening
The most famous of these tools, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI), is widely criticized by the scientific community. Adam Grant, an organizational psychologist at Wharton, has been vocal about this for years. He points out that the MBTI has poor test-retest reliability. Basically, if you take the test now and again in five weeks, there is a very high chance you get a different result. That’s because human personality isn’t a series of hard-coded switches. It’s a spectrum.
Then you have the Gallup CliftonStrengths, formerly StrengthsFinder. This one is a bit more robust because it focuses on "talents" that can be developed into strengths. It’s used by over 90% of Fortune 500 companies. But even there, the "weaknesses" part is often ignored. Companies love the "Strengths-Based Leadership" model because it sounds positive. It’s easy to tell an employee they are "Strategic." It’s much harder to tell them their weakness is "Lack of Empathy" or "Inability to Execute."
Why We Obsess Over Labels
Labels are comfortable. They simplify a messy world. When a strengths and weaknesses test tells you that you are a "Visionary," it validates your ego. It’s basically professional astrology.
But look at the Enneagram. It’s surged in popularity lately, especially in creative circles and startups. It categorizes people into nine types based on core fears and desires. It feels deeper than a standard HR test because it touches on motivation, not just behavior. But is it "true"? It’s a framework. It’s a lens. If the lens helps you see your blind spots, it’s useful. If the lens makes you think you’re a finished product, it’s a cage.
Real growth happens in the friction.
Think about a high-performing athlete. They don't just take a test, see they have "strong hamstrings," and call it a day. They look for the deficit. They find the weak link in the kinetic chain. In business, we do the opposite. We double down on what we’re good at and hire "complementary teammates" to hide our flaws. While that’s great for short-term productivity, it’s terrible for personal resilience.
The Dark Side of Strengths
There is a concept in leadership coaching called "The Overused Strength." This is where the magic really happens in a strengths and weaknesses test.
Imagine you are incredibly "Analytical." That is a strength. But taken to an extreme, or used in the wrong context, it becomes "Analysis Paralysis." You become the person who can’t make a decision because you need one more data point. Your strength has become your biggest weakness.
📖 Related: Why 39 Broadway New York Still Rules the Lower Manhattan Skyline
Or take "Confidence."
Great for sales.
Great for leading a team through a crisis.
But if you don't dial it back, it turns into arrogance. You stop listening. You miss the warning signs. You crash the ship because you were too busy looking at how great you looked at the helm.
A good assessment—like the Hogan Assessments—actually looks at these "dark side" traits. They measure how your personality changes when you are tired, stressed, or bored. That is far more valuable than knowing you’re an extrovert when things are going well.
How to Actually Use a Strengths and Weaknesses Test
If you’re going to do this, do it right. Don't just take a free quiz on a random website and call yourself an expert on "you."
First, get 360-degree feedback. Your self-assessment is only one piece of the puzzle. Ask your peers, your direct reports, and your boss to rate you on the same scale. The gap between how you see yourself and how they see you? That gap is the only thing that matters.
If you think you’re a "Clear Communicator" but your team thinks you’re "Vague and Hard to Follow," your self-test is a lie. The truth exists in the collective observation of the people who have to deal with you every day.
Second, look for patterns across different tests. If CliftonStrengths says you are "Individualization" and the Big Five personality test says you are high in "Agreeableness," you’re starting to see a trend. You likely care deeply about people’s specific needs. That’s a data point.
Third, stop trying to "fix" your weaknesses in a vacuum.
Context is everything.
A weakness in one job is a strength in another. If you are "Impulsive," you’ll struggle as an accountant. You might thrive as a day trader or an emergency room nurse. Before you try to change who you are, check if you are just in the wrong room.
The "Big Five" Advantage
If you want the most scientifically "real" version of a strengths and weaknesses test, you look at the Big Five (OCEAN model).
- Openness: Are you curious or cautious?
- Conscientiousness: Are you organized or easy-going?
- Extraversion: Are you outgoing or reserved?
- Agreeableness: Are you compassionate or competitive?
- Neuroticism: Are you sensitive/nervous or secure/confident?
Unlike the MBTI, the Big Five doesn't put you in a box. It gives you a percentile. You aren't an "Introvert"; you are in the 30th percentile of Extraversion. This allows for nuance. It acknowledges that you can be mostly quiet but still enjoy a good party. It’s the gold standard for academic research because it actually predicts job performance and longevity.
👉 See also: How Much is 1000 Pesos in US Dollars Right Now? (The Honest Truth)
Specifically, Conscientiousness is the single best predictor of job success across almost every industry. If your test shows you are low there, no amount of "Creative Visionary" labeling will save your career if you can't hit a deadline.
Making the Data Actionable
Stop reading the reports and filing them in a drawer. If your strengths and weaknesses test says you are low in "Self-Regulation," that is a direct order to start practicing mindfulness or time-blocking.
Real insight requires discomfort.
I once worked with a CEO who took a high-end assessment. It told him he was "Highly Disruptive." He loved it. He thought it meant he was the next Steve Jobs. But his staff interpreted "Disruptive" as "He changes his mind every five minutes and we can't get any work done." He was using his strength as a weapon against his own company's productivity.
He had to learn to "dial down" his disruptiveness during execution phases. That’s the real work. It’s not about finding out who you are; it’s about deciding who you need to be for the task at hand.
Next Steps for Real Growth
Forget the ego-stroking "You are a Genius" results. To turn a strengths and weaknesses test into actual career capital, follow these specific steps:
- Cross-Reference: Take two different types of tests (e.g., a Big Five and a CliftonStrengths). Identify the three traits that appear in both. These are your "Hardcoded" traits.
- The "Shadow" Exercise: For your top three strengths, write down how they look when they are overused. If you are "Diligent," the shadow is "Micromanagement." Acknowledge the shadow.
- The 2-Week Audit: Pick one "weakness" identified in your test. For fourteen days, track every time that weakness manifests in a meeting or a project. Don't try to fix it yet. Just notice it. Awareness is 80% of the battle.
- Feedback Loop: Show your test results to a trusted colleague. Ask them, "On a scale of 1-10, how much does this actually sound like me in a crisis?" Their answer will be more valuable than the 20-page PDF the test generated.
- Skill vs. Trait: Distinguish between a lack of skill (I don't know how to use Excel) and a personality trait (I am naturally disorganized). You can fix a skill weakness with a course. You manage a trait weakness with systems and habits.
Don't let a test define you. Use it as a mirror. Sometimes mirrors show us things we don't want to see, like a piece of spinach in our teeth or a glaring lack of emotional intelligence. But you can't fix what you refuse to look at.