Maps aren't just paper or pixels. They're arguments. When you look at a color map of the United States, you’re seeing a specific slice of reality that someone decided to highlight, often at the expense of everything else. It’s kinda wild how much power a few shades of red, blue, or green can have over how we perceive an entire country.
Most of us grew up with those classic classroom maps. You know the ones. The states are all different colors—maybe Ohio is yellow and Kentucky is purple—just so you don't get them confused. This is a "qualitative" map. It’s the simplest version. But honestly, as soon as you move into data, things get messy and fascinating. Whether it’s tracking the spread of a flu strain, visualizing who voted for whom, or seeing where the most lightning strikes happen, the colors we choose change the story.
The Psychology of the Palette
Why do we use red for "danger" or "hot"? It’s intuitive. But in a color map of the United States, these choices carry baggage. Take the most famous example: the political map. It wasn't always red and blue. Back in the day, TV networks used whatever colors they felt like. In 1976, NBC actually used blue for Republicans and red for Democrats. Imagine that today. It would feel totally "wrong" because we’ve been conditioned to see the country through a specific lens.
When cartographers choose a "choropleth" map—that’s the fancy name for maps where areas are shaded in proportion to a variable—they have to deal with the "small area" problem. Think about a map showing population density. If you use a dark color for high density, a tiny dot like New York City vanishes, while a giant, sparsely populated state like Montana dominates the visual field. This is why a standard color map of the United States can be so misleading. It makes it look like land is voting, or land is getting sick, rather than people.
Experts like Kenneth Field, a cartographic designer and author of Cartography., often point out that the human eye isn't great at comparing areas of different shapes. We see a big red square and think "Wow, that’s a lot of red," even if the actual data point it represents is smaller than a tiny blue circle in a crowded corner of the map. It's a visual trick that our brains play on us every single time.
🔗 Read more: Finding the Right Word That Starts With AJ for Games and Everyday Writing
Shifting From Hex Codes to Reality
Let's talk about the "Purple America" movement. Robert Vanderbei at Princeton University is famous for his "election map" that doesn't just use solid reds and blues. Instead, he uses shades of purple to show the actual margins. Because, let’s be real, no state is 100% one thing. When you look at a standard color map of the United States during an election year, it looks like a country divided by hard borders. But a purple map shows a gradient. It shows that we’re basically a mix. It’s a lot more nuanced, but it’s also harder to read at a glance, which is why news stations rarely use it. They want the drama of the "Big Map."
There's also the "heat map" style. These are the ones you see on the weather channel or in climate studies. They use a sequential color scheme. Usually, it’s light to dark. If you’re looking at annual rainfall, light tan might mean "bone dry" and deep navy might mean "tropical rainforest."
The Accessibility Gap
One thing people constantly forget? Color blindness. Roughly 8% of men have some form of it. If you design a color map of the United States using a red-green scale, you are literally making that map invisible or confusing to millions of people. Professional mapmakers now use tools like ColorBrewer. Developed by Cynthia Brewer at Penn State, this tool helps creators pick color schemes that are "colorblind safe." It’s not just about being nice; it’s about making sure the data is actually accessible. If a doctor can't read a disease outbreak map because the colors bleed together, that's a genuine problem.
How to Spot a "Lie" on a Map
Next time you see a colored map of the country, ask yourself: what is the "break point"?
💡 You might also like: Is there actually a legal age to stay home alone? What parents need to know
Mapmakers use different statistical methods to group data.
- Equal Interval: Each color represents the same range of numbers (e.g., 0-10, 11-20). This is great for showing extremes.
- Quantiles: Each color represents the same number of states (e.g., 10 states are red, 10 are orange). This can make a map look more "balanced" than it actually is.
- Natural Breaks (Jenks): This looks for "natural" clusters in the data. It’s often the most "honest," but it can be confusing because the ranges are all different.
If you change the break points, you change the map. You can take the exact same data about, say, unemployment rates, and make the country look like it's in a total crisis or a golden age just by tweaking where the "dark red" starts. It’s data manipulation without changing a single number.
The Future of Visualizing the States
We’re moving toward "bivariate" maps. These are cool but a bit of a brain-melter. They show two different variables at once using a grid of colors. For instance, you could show "Education Level" on one axis and "Income Level" on another. The resulting color map of the United States uses a mix of colors (like a strange teal-to-magenta scale) to show where those two things intersect. It’s the kind of map that makes you squint, but it tells a much richer story than a single-color map ever could.
Then you have cartograms. These are the maps that look "melted." They distort the size of the states based on population. Suddenly, New Jersey is huge and Wyoming is a sliver. When you apply color to a cartogram, the visual bias of land area is gone. You’re finally seeing the data relative to the people it affects. It’s ugly to some, but it’s arguably the most "truthful" way to look at a color map of the United States.
📖 Related: The Long Haired Russian Cat Explained: Why the Siberian is Basically a Living Legend
Practical Steps for Your Own Projects
If you're ever in a position where you need to create or interpret one of these maps, don't just grab the default settings in Excel or Tableau.
- Check the "Zero": Does the color scale start at zero, or is it "stretched" to make small differences look huge?
- Look for the Legend: If there’s no clear legend explaining what the colors mean, the map is basically art, not data.
- Consider the Base: Is the map projected correctly? Using a Mercator projection for a US map makes the northern states look way bigger than they are. Most pros use Albers Equal Area for the US.
- Test for Contrast: Print it in black and white. If you can't tell the difference between the shades, your color choices are too close together.
- Use Diverging Scales for Midpoints: If you’re showing something like "Change in Population," use a neutral color (like white or gray) for "no change," then one color for "growth" and a different one for "decline."
Maps are powerful. A color map of the United States can start a conversation or end one. It can influence where businesses move, where people live, and how we view our neighbors. Understanding that the colors are a choice—and often a subjective one—is the first step toward becoming a more informed observer of the world.
Stop looking at the states as solid blocks of color. Look for the gradients, the outliers, and the stories hidden in the legend. The real United States isn't a collection of 50 solid-colored shapes; it's a messy, overlapping, shifting spectrum that no single map can ever fully capture.
Actionable Insights for Map Enthusiasts
- Download ColorBrewer: If you're designing anything, use this tool to ensure your palettes are scientifically sound and accessible.
- Use ArcGIS or QGIS for Accuracy: Avoid basic spreadsheet mapping for serious work. These programs allow for proper projections (like Albers) that don't distort state sizes.
- Diversify Your Sources: Never rely on a single map for a complex issue like climate or politics. Compare a standard choropleth with a cartogram to see how the "land area bias" is affecting your perception.
- Always Verify the Normalization: Ensure the data is "normalized" (e.g., "per capita" rather than "total count"). A map of "Total Coffee Shops" will always just be a map of "Where People Live" unless you adjust for population.