Why You Should Watch The Grinch That Stole Christmas (1966) Instead of the Remakes

Why You Should Watch The Grinch That Stole Christmas (1966) Instead of the Remakes

Honestly, the holidays feel crowded now. Between the endless streaming scrolls and the pressure to find that one "perfect" family movie, we often overlook the masterpiece that started it all. If you want to watch The Grinch That Stole Christmas and actually feel something other than sensory overload, you have to go back to 1966. It’s only 26 minutes long. Think about that. In less time than it takes to order a pizza, Chuck Jones and Theodor Geisel (Dr. Seuss himself) managed to distill the entire essence of greed, redemption, and community into a hand-drawn marvel.

Most people today are used to the over-the-top antics of the later live-action or big-budget 3D versions. They’re fine, I guess. But they add a lot of "fluff"—origin stories about the Grinch being bullied in school or weird romantic subplots that the original book never needed. The 1966 special doesn't care about "why" the Grinch is mean. He just is. His heart is two sizes too small. That's the premise, and it works because it's simple.

The Genius of Boris Karloff and Chuck Jones

You can't talk about this special without mentioning Boris Karloff. It was a bit of a gamble at the time. Karloff was the "horror guy," the man behind Frankenstein’s monster. People thought he’d be too scary for a kids' cartoon. Instead, his narration provided this gravelly, sophisticated warmth that nobody has been able to replicate. He doesn't just read the lines; he inhabits them. When he describes the "Who-pudding" and the "rare Who-roast-beast," you can almost smell the kitchen.

Then there is Chuck Jones. Coming off his legendary run with Looney Tunes, Jones brought a specific kind of physical comedy to the Grinch. Look at the Grinch’s face when he gets a "wonderful, awful idea." That iconic, toothy grin that hitches up toward his eyes? That’s pure Jones. It’s expressive in a way that modern CGI often misses because it tries too hard to look realistic.

The animation has quirks. Sometimes the colors bleed a little. The transitions are sharp. But there is a soul in those hand-painted cels. You can see the artistry in every frame where the Grinch is stuffing a Christmas tree up a chimney. It feels tactile.

📖 Related: Isaiah Washington Movies and Shows: Why the Star Still Matters

What Most People Get Wrong About the Music

Whenever someone decides to watch The Grinch That Stole Christmas, they expect the singing. But here’s a fun fact that surprises a lot of people: Boris Karloff didn't sing "You're a Mean One, Mr. Grinch."

Everyone assumes it’s him because the voice is so deep and matches the narration perfectly. It was actually Thurl Ravenscroft. You might recognize his voice from somewhere else—he was the original voice of Tony the Tiger ("They're Grrrrreat!"). Because Ravenscroft wasn't credited in the closing titles, Karloff got all the credit for years. Dr. Seuss actually felt so bad about the mix-up that he wrote a letter to every major columnist in the country to set the record straight.

The song itself is a masterclass in creative insults. "You’re a foul one, Mr. Grinch / You have termites in your smile." Who writes like that anymore? It’s cynical, dark, and hilarious, which makes the eventual pivot to the Grinch’s change of heart feel earned rather than sappy.

Why the 1966 Version Still Dominates Search and Hearts

There’s a reason this specific version maintains a 100% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. It’s lean. Modern movies are bloated. They feel the need to explain every single character beat. In the 1966 special, Max the dog is the silent MVP. He doesn't talk. He doesn't have a snarky internal monologue. He just expresses pure, unadulterated loyalty mixed with a healthy dose of "I can't believe I'm doing this."

👉 See also: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine

Max is the audience surrogate. When the Grinch is being a monster, Max’s wide eyes tell us exactly how we should feel. It’s visual storytelling at its peak.

The Real Message Beyond the Commercialism

We talk a lot about the "true meaning of Christmas," but the 1966 special hits it harder because it’s so stark. When the Grinch stands on top of Mount Crumpit, waiting to hear the Whos cry, and instead hears them singing? That’s the pivot point. It’s not about the "stuff."

  • The toys are gone.
  • The food is gone.
  • The ribbons and tags are gone.

And yet, the community remains. In an era where the holidays feel like a race to spend the most money, taking 26 minutes to watch The Grinch That Stole Christmas is a necessary palette cleanser. It reminds us that the holiday "doesn't come from a store."

Technical Hurdles and the "Green" Grinch

Did you know the Grinch wasn't originally green? In the original Dr. Seuss book, he was black and white with some red accents. It was Chuck Jones who decided to make him that sickly, iconic shade of green. Rumor has it he was inspired by the color of some ugly rental cars he had been driving at the time. It was a brilliant move. That green contrasts perfectly against the bright reds and whites of Whoville, making the Grinch look like a literal virus in the middle of a celebration.

✨ Don't miss: Why Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy Actors Still Define the Modern Spy Thriller

The production was also incredibly expensive for its time. It cost around $315,000 in 1966, which was astronomical for a half-hour animation. For context, that’s over $2.5 million in today’s money. Most of that budget went into the fluidity of the animation and securing top-tier talent. It wasn't a "cheap" TV special; it was a cinematic event brought to the small screen.

How to Watch it Today Without the Hassle

Finding where to watch The Grinch That Stole Christmas can be a bit of a moving target depending on the year. Usually, it lands on Peacock or is available for a few dollars on platforms like Amazon or Apple TV.

If you’re looking for the best experience, try to find a remastered version. The colors in the 50th-anniversary editions are stunning. The whites of the snow actually pop, and the Grinch’s fur looks vibrant rather than muddy.

Don't settle for the low-quality clips on YouTube if you can help it. The sound design is half the fun. The way the sleigh creaks under the weight of all those stolen presents is a sound that stays with you.

Actionable Steps for Your Holiday Viewing

If you're planning a movie night, don't just throw this on in the background while you're on your phone. It's too short for that.

  1. Pair it with the book. If you have kids, read the book first. It’s almost word-for-word the same as the special, which helps them appreciate the "extra" bits the animation adds (like the sleigh ride down the mountain).
  2. Watch the eyes. Pay attention to the Grinch’s pupils. Chuck Jones used the eyes to signal the Grinch’s shift from malice to realization. It’s a subtle bit of animation that most people miss on the first ten viewings.
  3. Listen for the instruments. The score by Albert Hague is surprisingly complex. It uses brass in a way that feels heavy and "grinchy" before transitioning into the lighter, melodic tones of the Whos.
  4. Skip the bloat. If you're short on time, this is the version to choose. It provides all the emotional payoff of a two-hour movie in a fraction of the time.

The 1966 How the Grinch Stole Christmas! is more than just a cartoon. It’s a historical artifact of a time when the best creative minds in the business—Jones, Seuss, and Karloff—collided to make something that didn't talk down to children. It’s dark, it’s weird, and it’s ultimately incredibly hopeful. Stop looking for the "new" thing and just go back to the best thing.