Ever tried to guess how many jellybeans are in a giant jar at a county fair? You probably failed. I definitely did. But if you take every single person’s guess—the kids, the accountants, the guy who just wants the jar—and average them out, the result is usually terrifyingly close to the truth. This isn't magic. It's a statistical phenomenon known as the wisdom of the crowd, and honestly, it’s one of the few things keeping our modern world from spinning off its axis.
We see it everywhere. Stock markets. Wikipedia. The way Google ranks pages. It’s the idea that a large group of diverse, independent individuals can collectively be smarter than any single expert. Even the geniuses. Especially the geniuses who think they know everything.
The Ox That Started It All
The whole concept blew up thanks to a guy named Francis Galton back in 1906. He wasn't exactly a man of the people; he was a polymath and, frankly, a bit of an elitist who was obsessed with heredity. He was at a fat stock and poultry exhibition in Plymouth when he saw a contest to guess the weight of a slaughtered and dressed ox.
Galton thought the "average" person was, well, not great at math or logic. He expected the crowd to be way off. There were about 800 people placing bets. After the contest, Galton borrowed the tickets and ran the numbers. He calculated the median of the guesses.
The crowd’s guess? 1,197 pounds.
The actual weight? 1,198 pounds.
Galton was floored. The crowd was off by less than 0.1%. He realized that while individual guesses were all over the map—some way too high, some laughably low—the collective judgment was almost perfect. The errors cancelled each other out. It turns out that when you show wisdom of the crowd in action, you're looking at a massive, organic noise-reduction machine.
✨ Don't miss: Elon Musk Explained: What Most People Get Wrong About the Worlds Richest Man
When the Crowd Actually Works (and When It Fails)
It’s not enough to just get a bunch of people in a room and ask them a question. If that were true, every committee meeting would be a masterclass in brilliance. We all know that’s not the case. James Surowiecki, who wrote the definitive book on this, argues that for a crowd to be "wise," you need four specific things.
First, diversity of opinion. You need people with different backgrounds. If everyone in the crowd is an Ivy League economist, they’ll all have the same blind spots. You need the plumber, the teacher, and the high school dropout in there too.
Second, independence. This is huge. People’s guesses shouldn't be influenced by those around them. If I shout "2,000 pounds!" and everyone else just nods and agrees because I look like I know what I'm talking about, the crowd becomes a mob. Mobs are stupid. Crowds are smart.
Third, decentralization. People need to be able to draw on local, specific knowledge.
📖 Related: Jeremy Siegel Stocks for the Long Run: Why the Best Advice is the Hardest to Follow
Finally, aggregation. You need a way to turn those private judgments into a collective decision. This is where the math happens.
The Dark Side: Herding and Bubbles
We've all seen what happens when these rules break. Look at the 2008 housing bubble or the GameStop stock frenzy. That wasn't the wisdom of the crowd; that was herding. When people start watching what everyone else is doing and stop thinking for themselves, the "independence" pillar collapses.
Social media makes this worse. Algorithms are designed to show us what our "crowd" thinks, which creates echo chambers. If you only see opinions that mirror your own, you aren't part of a wise crowd anymore. You're just in a choir.
Real wisdom requires disagreement. It requires that weird uncle who has a totally different take on the economy. When we silence the outliers, we actually make the group dumber.
Predicting the Future with Money
One of the coolest ways to show wisdom of the crowd is through prediction markets. Sites like Polymarket or the Iowa Electronic Markets let people bet real money on things like election outcomes or whether a movie will win an Oscar.
Why does this work better than polls? Because people hate losing money.
🔗 Read more: Warren Buffett Annual Letter 2025: Why the Oracle is Finally Going Quiet
In a poll, you might say what you wish would happen. In a prediction market, you bet on what you think will actually happen. The financial incentive forces honesty. These markets often outperform expert pundits because they aggregate thousands of tiny pieces of information that no single analyst could ever track.
For example, a local person might see a candidate’s campaign office looking empty and sell their "shares" in that candidate. Someone else might see a surge in local registrations and buy. The price of the "contract" reflects the sum of all that on-the-ground intel.
How to Use This in Your Own Life
You don't need a statistical degree to leverage this. It’s about how you seek advice.
Stop asking just your best friend for their opinion. They likely think just like you. Instead, find five people who don't know each other and ask them the same question. Don't tell them what the others said.
If you’re a manager, stop holding "brainstorming" sessions where the loudest person dominates the room. Instead, have everyone write down their ideas anonymously before the meeting starts. Then, aggregate those ideas. You’ll be shocked at how much better the results are when you remove the social pressure to conform.
The Practical Path Forward
To truly benefit from the collective intelligence around you, start implementing these habits:
- Seek the "Dissenter": Specifically look for the person who disagrees with the consensus. They hold the "error" that might be missing from your own calculation.
- Blind Your Data: If you’re asking for feedback on a project, don't give your own opinion first. Let people react to the raw material without your bias "priming" them.
- Use Averages, Not Extremes: When faced with a range of estimates for a cost or a timeline, the middle of the pack is statistically your safest bet, even if the "expert" says otherwise.
- Audit Your Information Sources: If your news feed looks like a mirror, break it. Follow people you find slightly annoying or whose logic you find flawed. You need their "noise" to find the "signal."
The crowd isn't always right. It can be panicked, biased, or just plain lazy. But when the conditions are right—when people are free to think for themselves and the results are tallied fairly—the collective mind is a formidable tool. It’s why democracy, for all its messiness, tends to outlast dictatorships. It’s why the market eventually corrects itself. And it’s why, next time you're at the fair, you should probably just bet on the average of everyone else's guesses.