Most war movies are about the noise. You know the drill: the constant rattle of machine guns, the soaring orchestral swells, and the heroic speeches delivered by men with perfectly smudged dirt on their faces. But Winter in Wartime, or Oorlogswinter as it’s known in its native Dutch, is different. It is quiet. It is cold. Honestly, it's one of those rare films that understands that war isn't just a series of battles; it’s a grueling exercise in waiting, shivering, and making impossible choices when you're barely old enough to shave.
Directed by Martin Koolhoven and based on the semi-autobiographical novel by Jan Terlouw, the film centers on 14-year-old Michiel. It’s 1945 in the Nazi-occupied Netherlands. The "Hunger Winter" is in full swing. People are eating tulip bulbs to stay alive. The snow is thick, grey, and oppressive.
What Sets This Winter in Wartime Movie Apart
Usually, cinema treats the Dutch resistance as a unified, heroic front. We like that narrative. It’s clean. But this winter in wartime movie gets its hands dirty with the messy reality of occupation. Michiel’s father is the mayor, a man trying to keep the peace by cooperating—sorta—with the Germans to prevent his town from being burned down. His uncle, Ben, is the "cool" one, the adventurous resistance fighter who represents everything Michiel wants to be.
Then a British pilot crashes in the woods.
Suddenly, the war isn't a distant abstract concept or a game of soldiers in the snow. It’s a bleeding, terrified man hidden in a secret basement. Michiel has to step up. He has to lie to his parents. He has to smuggle food. He has to grow up in about forty-eight hours.
The pacing here isn't like an American blockbuster. It’s slow. It builds. You feel the dampness of the socks and the way the wind cuts through thin wool coats. Koolhoven uses the landscape as a character. The white snow makes every dark figure on the horizon a potential threat. You can't hide in a field of white. Every footprint is a breadcrumb for the Gestapo.
📖 Related: Big Brother 27 Morgan: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
The Nuance of "Collaborators"
We need to talk about the father, Johan. In many films, he’d be the villain. The coward. But the movie asks a brutal question: what is the "right" thing to do when you're responsible for an entire village? If you rebel, the Nazis shoot ten innocent people. If you cooperate, you’re a traitor. It’s a lose-lose situation. This moral ambiguity is the heart of the story. It moves away from the "Good vs. Evil" trope and moves into the "Survival vs. Conscience" territory.
Michiel’s journey is basically a deconstruction of the hero's journey. He starts with romanticized notions of bravery. He thinks it's all about secret messages and outsmarting the "muffs" (a derogatory term for Germans used at the time). By the end, he realizes that bravery is mostly just terrifying, lonely, and often results in losing the people you love.
The cinematography by Guido van Gennep is stunning. It doesn't look like a postcard. It looks like a graveyard. The blues and greys are so desaturated you almost forget what color looks like. That’s intentional. It mirrors the emotional drain on the characters. When blood does hit the snow, the contrast is violent. It’s a reminder that beneath the quiet, frozen landscape, something horrific is happening.
Realism and the Hunger Winter
To understand why this film hits so hard, you have to know about the actual historical context. The winter of 1944-1945 in the Netherlands was a nightmare. The Nazis cut off food and fuel shipments as punishment for Dutch support of the Allied forces. Over 20,000 people starved to death.
- People traveled hundreds of kilometers on bicycles with wooden tires just to find a bag of potatoes.
- The ground was too frozen to bury the dead.
- Electricity was non-existent.
When you watch Michiel trekking through the woods, he’s not just a character in a plot; he’s a representation of a generation of Dutch children who lost their innocence to the cold. Jan Terlouw, who wrote the book, lived through this. He was a child during the occupation. That’s why the details feel so specific. The way a character reacts to a piece of real chocolate or the specific sound of a German motorcycle engine—those aren't guesses. They're memories.
👉 See also: The Lil Wayne Tracklist for Tha Carter 3: What Most People Get Wrong
Casting the Weight of War
Martijn Lakemeier, who plays Michiel, was only 15 when they filmed this. You can see the weight of the story settle on his shoulders as the movie progresses. His face changes. He starts as a boy and ends looking like a man who has seen too much. It’s one of the best juvenile performances in European cinema, honestly.
Then you have Jamie Campbell Bower as the downed pilot, Jack. He brings a frantic, kinetic energy that clashes with the stillness of the Dutch village. He’s the catalyst. He’s the proof that the world outside is on fire, even if Michiel’s town feels like it’s frozen in time.
Why It Still Matters in 2026
We live in an era of "fast" media. Everything is loud. Everything is explained. This winter in wartime movie respects the audience enough to let them sit in the silence. It doesn't tell you how to feel about every character. It presents a situation where every choice has a price, and then it makes you watch the bill come due.
It also challenges the idea of the "perfect" resistance. In reality, the resistance was disorganized, paranoid, and riddled with double agents. The film captures that paranoia perfectly. Who can you trust? The neighbor who gives you bread? The uncle who tells you stories? Your own father? In a occupied territory, trust is a luxury no one can afford.
The film was shortlisted for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film for a reason. It bridges the gap between a "war movie" and a "psychological thriller." It’s about the internal war as much as the external one.
✨ Don't miss: Songs by Tyler Childers: What Most People Get Wrong
Technical Mastery Without the Flash
There are no massive CGI explosions. No thousands of extras. The scale is intimate. By keeping the camera close to Michiel, the director makes the stakes feel massive. If Michiel fails, Jack dies. If Jack dies, Michiel has to live with that forever. It’s a microcosm of the entire global conflict played out in a small patch of woods.
The sound design is equally impressive. The crunch of boots on frozen earth becomes a jump-scare. The silence of the forest is heavy. It forces you to listen, just like the characters are listening for the sound of an approaching patrol.
Actionable Insights for Cinephiles and History Buffs
If you’re planning to watch or study this film, don't go in expecting Saving Private Ryan. Go in expecting something closer to Pan's Labyrinth—minus the monsters, though some would argue the Nazis are monsters enough.
- Watch the Dutch version: Do not watch a dubbed version. The linguistic barrier between the Dutch characters, the English pilot, and the German soldiers is a vital plot point. The struggle to communicate adds a layer of tension that dubbing completely destroys.
- Contextualize the "Hunger Winter": Spend ten minutes reading about the 1944 Dutch famine before hitting play. Knowing that the characters are genuinely starving adds a layer of desperation to every scene involving food.
- Observe the use of light: Notice how interiors are lit by candlelight or dim oil lamps. It creates a claustrophobic feeling that contrasts with the vast, exposed feeling of the outdoor scenes.
- Compare with the book: If you're a reader, Jan Terlouw’s novel is a masterpiece of Young Adult literature that doesn't talk down to its audience. Seeing how Koolhoven adapted the internal monologue of a teenager into visual storytelling is a masterclass in filmmaking.
This film remains a staple of Dutch culture because it refuses to simplify history. It acknowledges that in war, sometimes the "heroes" do bad things and the "cowards" are just trying to save lives. It’s a cold, hard look at the end of childhood.
To truly appreciate the film, look for the subtle cues of Michiel’s loss of innocence, specifically in his changing relationship with his bicycle—a symbol of freedom that eventually becomes a tool of weary necessity. Pay close attention to the final confrontation on the bridge; it’s a sequence that subverts almost every trope of the genre while remaining devastatingly logical.
Ultimately, the movie isn't just about surviving the winter or surviving the war. It's about surviving the realization that the world is much more complicated and much more cruel than you were ever told. It’s a haunting piece of work that lingers long after the credits roll, making you grateful for the warmth of your own home and the simplicity of a world where you don't have to choose who lives and who dies before you’ve even finished school.