Ever tried to code a website in 1994? It sucked. You’d type out a bunch of <center> and <font color="red"> tags, save the file, open a browser, and pray it didn't look like a total disaster. Most of the time, it did. Then came the "What You See Is What You Get" revolution—or WYSIWYG, if you’re into clunky acronyms that are impossible to pronounce at a dinner party. It changed everything. Suddenly, you weren't guessing. You were just moving things around on a screen and seeing the result in real-time. It felt like magic, honestly.
But here’s the thing: we take it for granted now. Whether you’re dragging a block in Squarespace or bolding text in a Google Doc, you’re using this tech. It’s the invisible backbone of the modern internet. Yet, there’s a massive tension between the convenience of "What You See Is What You Get" and the raw power of clean, hand-written code.
The Wild West of Early WYSIWYG Editors
If we’re going to talk about how we got here, we have to talk about Xerox PARC. Back in the 70s, researchers there created Bravo. It was the first actual WYSIWYG editor. Before Bravo, if you wanted to bold a word, you’d see weird control characters on your screen, not actual bold text. Bravo changed that. It paved the way for Microsoft Word and, eventually, the web editors we use today.
Fast forward to the late 90s. Remember FrontPage? Or Dreamweaver? Those were the titans. If you were a "web designer" back then, you probably used one of them. FrontPage was notorious for injecting thousands of lines of "junk code" that only worked in Internet Explorer. It was a mess. But for a small business owner in 1998, it was a godsend. They didn't need to know HTML; they just needed a digital flyer.
Why the Tech World Got Snobby About It
For a while, using a "What You See Is What You Get" tool was seen as "cheating" by "real" developers. There’s a reason for that. Early editors were terrible at handling CSS. They used inline styles for everything. This made websites heavy, slow, and a nightmare to update. If you wanted to change your site’s font from blue to red, you had to do it on every single page manually.
📖 Related: Deepfake Pornography: What It Is and Why It’s Not Just a Tech Problem
Then came the "Hand-Coded" movement. Developers argued—rightfully so at the time—that the only way to build a professional site was to write every line of code by hand. This created a massive divide. You had the "pros" writing raw PHP and CSS, and the "amateurs" using Wix or early WordPress plugins.
But things shifted. The tech got smarter.
Modern platforms like Webflow or the WordPress Gutenberg editor have narrowed that gap significantly. They don’t just spit out messy code anymore. They translate visual actions into clean, semantic HTML5 and CSS. You're basically programming visually. It’s efficient. It’s fast. And frankly, in 2026, time is the one thing no developer has enough of.
The "False Promise" of Absolute Visual Fidelity
Let’s get real for a second. The name "What You See Is What You Get" is actually a bit of a lie. On the web, what you see on your 27-inch 4K monitor is never what someone else sees on an iPhone 13 or a cracked Android tablet.
This is the "Responsive Design" problem.
A true WYSIWYG editor has to account for infinite screen sizes. This is why tools like Canva are great for print—where the paper size never changes—but complicated for web design. When you’re designing a site, you’re not designing a static image. You’re designing a set of rules for how content should behave.
If your editor tells you "this is exactly how it looks," it’s lying. It only looks that way right now on your screen. Professional designers know this. They use these tools to build the "vibe," but they always check the breakpoints. They know that the "What You See" part is just a very high-quality suggestion.
Where WYSIWYG Lives Today (and You Don't Even Realize It)
It’s not just about website builders. This philosophy is everywhere.
👉 See also: iPhone 5 Can't Remember My Passcode: Here is the Reality of Getting Back In
- Social Media: When you’re editing an Instagram Reel and dragging text around, that’s a WYSIWYG interface. You see the text over the video exactly where it will appear for your followers.
- Email Marketing: Tools like Mailchimp or Klaviyo use drag-and-drop editors because nobody wants to code a nested table in HTML just to send a newsletter.
- Gaming: Unreal Engine and Unity have moved heavily toward visual scripting and real-time viewport editing. Game designers can move a light source and see the shadows change instantly. They aren't waiting for a render.
- Productivity: Notion is a huge example. You type
/and a menu pops up. You add a gallery, and it’s right there. No back-end, no front-end—just the work.
The Accessibility Gap
Here is the part most people skip over: accessibility.
When you use a "What You See Is What You Get" editor, you’re often focused on the visual. But the internet isn’t just for people who can see perfectly. Screen readers need to know what a heading is, what an image represents (alt text), and what order the content is in.
Cheap or poorly designed visual editors often fail here. They might let you make text bigger and bolder so it looks like a heading, but they don't tag it as an <h2>. To a screen reader, it’s just plain text. This creates a massive barrier for millions of users. If you’re using these tools, you have a responsibility to look under the hood. You have to make sure the "Get" part of the equation includes everyone.
Will AI Kill the Visual Editor?
We’re seeing a shift toward generative UI. You tell an AI, "Build me a landing page for a coffee shop," and it does. You don't even drag a block. You just talk to it.
Does that mean WYSIWYG is dead?
Probably not. Humans are visual creatures. We like to tweak. We like to nudge things three pixels to the left just because it "feels" better. AI might get us 90% of the way there, but the last 10% will always require a human looking at a screen and saying, "Yeah, that’s it." The interface for that "final touch" will always be a visual one.
How to Use These Tools Without Ruining Your Project
If you’re leaning into visual editors for your business or personal brand, don’t just go in blind. You can actually make a mess if you aren't careful.
First, stop thinking in "pages" and start thinking in "components." Most modern editors allow you to save a style—like a button or a header—and reuse it. Do that. It keeps your design consistent. If you change the button color once, it should change everywhere.
Second, watch your images. Visual editors make it easy to upload a 10MB photo from your phone. Don’t. It’ll kill your site speed. Crop it, compress it, and then upload it. The editor won't always do that for you.
Third, always check the "mobile view." Most platforms have a little icon at the top that looks like a phone. Click it. Frequently. If it looks great on desktop but like a jumbled alphabet soup on a phone, you’ve failed.
Moving Forward With Intention
The "What You See Is What You Get" philosophy is about democratizing creation. It’s about taking the power of the web away from the gatekeepers who know how to use a terminal and giving it to the people who have something to say. That’s a good thing.
But don't let the simplicity make you lazy. Understand that the "code" is still there, even if you can't see it. Use the tools to speed up your workflow, but keep your eyes on the details that the software might miss.
To get the most out of your digital projects, follow these steps:
- Audit your current tools: Are you using an editor that generates clean, accessible code? Check your site with a tool like Lighthouse to see if your "visual" ease is costing you SEO performance.
- Prioritize mobile-first: Instead of designing for your big screen and shrinking it down, try building the mobile version of your layout first. It forces you to prioritize what actually matters.
- Learn the basics of HTML/CSS: Even if you never plan to write a line of code, knowing what a `