Thomas Jefferson was having a bit of a moment in 1787. He was in Paris, sipping wine and serving as the American minister to France, while back home, his peers were sweating through a humid Philadelphia summer trying to draft a new Constitution. Jefferson wasn't there. He was watching from a distance, and frankly, he wasn't as worried about "shays' Rebellion" as everyone else seemed to be. That little uprising of debt-ridden farmers in Massachusetts scared the living daylights out of George Washington and James Madison. They saw anarchy; Jefferson saw a healthy, if slightly messy, sign of life.
It was in this specific, high-tension context that he wrote a letter to William Stephens Smith, the son-in-law of John Adams. He dropped the line that has since been plastered on everything from protest signs to bumper stickers: the idea that we must periodically water the tree of liberty with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
People love to scream this quote. They love to use it to justify whatever political anger they’re feeling this week. But if you actually look at the ink on the parchment, Jefferson wasn't calling for a perpetual civil war. He was making a point about political "manure." He thought a little rebellion now and then was a necessary medicine for the sound health of government. It’s a wild thought. Most leaders want total stability. Jefferson wanted a bit of chaos to keep the elites honest.
The Letter That Started It All
Context matters. It really does. You can't just pluck a sentence out of the 18th century and pretend it means the same thing in a world of nuclear weapons and Twitter threads. When Jefferson mentioned the need to water the tree of liberty, he was responding to the news of Shays' Rebellion. To the Federalists, Daniel Shays and his band of farmers were terrorists. To Jefferson, they were just "misinformed."
He argued that the people can’t always be well-informed, and that their occasional errors should be met with instruction, not punishment. He famously wrote, "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is its natural manure."
Jefferson was basically saying that if the government becomes too comfortable, it becomes a cage. He believed that the "motive" of the rebels was often founded in ignorance, but the act of rebelling showed that the people still had spirit. If they stopped rebelling, it meant they had become lethargic. And lethargy, in Jefferson’s mind, was the precursor to death for a free state.
What People Get Wrong About the "Manure"
Most folks focus on the "blood" part. It's dramatic. It's visceral. But the "manure" part is actually the most interesting bit of the metaphor. Manure is waste. It’s the byproduct of life. Jefferson was suggesting that political unrest—even the violent kind—is a natural byproduct of a living, breathing democracy.
Think about it this way.
💡 You might also like: Passive Resistance Explained: Why It Is Way More Than Just Standing Still
If a body doesn't produce waste, it's dead. If a country doesn't produce some level of friction or even occasional upheaval, it’s probably because the people are too oppressed to move. Jefferson was terrified of the "calm of despotism." He preferred a stormy sea of liberty to a dead-calm pool of tyranny.
Is this a dangerous way to think? Absolutely.
Madison and Washington thought Jefferson was being reckless. They were trying to build a stable, long-lasting republic, and here was Jefferson in Paris saying, "Eh, let 'em have a riot every twenty years. It's good for the soul." This tension between the need for order and the need for "refreshment" is the central nervous system of American history.
The 20th Century Transformation of the Quote
For a long time, this quote was a bit of an academic footnote. Then came the 1990s. Then came the era of hyper-polarization. Suddenly, the urge to water the tree of liberty became a rallying cry for militia groups and anti-government extremists.
Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City bomber, was famously wearing a T-shirt with the quote and a picture of a tree dripping blood when he was arrested. This shifted the public perception of the phrase from a philosophical musing on democratic health to a literal call for domestic terrorism. It's a heavy burden for a piece of 1787 correspondence to carry.
Historians like Annette Gordon-Reed have often pointed out that Jefferson was a man of immense contradictions. He wrote about liberty while owning hundreds of human beings. He praised rebellion from the safety of a French salon. When we use his words today, we have to grapple with the fact that his "patriots" were a very specific group of people, and his "tyrants" were often anyone who got in the way of his vision of an agrarian utopia.
Why the Metaphor Still Sticks
Why hasn't this phrase died out? Because it taps into a fundamental American anxiety: the fear that our government will eventually stop listening to us.
📖 Related: What Really Happened With the Women's Orchestra of Auschwitz
- It speaks to the underdog.
- It validates the feeling that "the system" is rigged.
- It provides a poetic justification for anger.
- It's short, punchy, and sounds authoritative.
When people feel like the ballot box isn't working, they start looking for other ways to water the tree of liberty. We saw versions of this sentiment on both sides of the aisle during the various protests and riots of the 2020s. Whether it’s the left calling for "reimagining" systems or the right calling for "taking the country back," the underlying DNA is Jeffersonian. It's the idea that the status quo is not sacred.
The "Blood" vs. The "Ballot"
Abraham Lincoln actually provided the best counter-argument to Jefferson’s "blood" theory during his Lyceum Address. Lincoln argued that the real threat to the tree of liberty wasn't a lack of rebellion, but a lack of reverence for the law. He believed that if every person decided to "refresh" the tree whenever they felt slighted, the tree would eventually be hacked to pieces.
So, we have two competing visions of American survival.
Jefferson says the tree needs blood.
Lincoln says the tree needs the rule of law.
Most of our history is just us trying to figure out which one of them was right. Honestly, we’re still trying to figure it out. Jefferson’s view is inherently radical. It’s "revolutionary" in the literal sense—it implies a cycle. You build, you grow, you rebel, you prune, you start over.
Actionable Ways to Think About Political "Refreshment"
If we take Jefferson seriously—but maybe not literally (because, let's be real, literal "blood" is a catastrophe)—how do we actually maintain a healthy democracy? How do you water the tree of liberty without burning down the forest?
First, you have to realize that "refreshment" doesn't have to mean violence. It means accountability. It means being the "manure" that keeps the elites from getting too comfortable.
👉 See also: How Much Did Trump Add to the National Debt Explained (Simply)
- Stop treating politicians like celebrities. Jefferson’s whole point was that the people in power are just temporary stewards who will eventually get "misinformed" or corrupt. Constant skepticism is the water.
- Engage in "small-r" republicanism. This isn't about the GOP. It's about the idea that you are a citizen with a duty to know what's happening in your local school board, not just who's winning the presidential race.
- Support structural "pruning." Term limits, ethics reforms, and transparency laws are the modern versions of Jefferson's "rebellion." They shake the tree without killing it.
- Accept that friction is normal. We often freak out when there’s political conflict. Jefferson would tell us to relax. Conflict is a sign that people still care. The day we all agree on everything is the day we’ve probably been conquered.
Jefferson’s letter to Smith was a defense of a few hundred farmers with pitchforks. Today, the "tree" is a global superpower with a massive bureaucracy. The stakes are higher. But the core question remains: how do we keep the people in charge from forgetting who they work for?
Jefferson thought the answer was fear. He said, "What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance?"
You don't need a musket to show the spirit of resistance. You need a long memory, a sharp eye for corruption, and the willingness to be "inconvenient" to those in power. That's how you actually keep the tree alive in the 21st century.
Moving Forward With Historical Nuance
To truly understand what it means to water the tree of liberty, we have to stop using the quote as a weapon and start using it as a diagnostic tool.
Ask yourself: Is the current "unrest" in society a sign of healthy resistance or a sign of terminal decay? Jefferson would argue it's the former. He’d probably be fascinated by our modern protests, though he’d likely be confused by our technology.
The next step for anyone interested in this philosophy isn't to go out and find a "tyrant" to fight. It's to study the actual failures of the Articles of Confederation that led to the quote in the first place. Read the Federalist Papers, then read the Anti-Federalist Papers. See the argument for what it was: a high-stakes debate about how much chaos a free society can actually tolerate before it collapses.
Stay skeptical of anyone who uses this quote to justify harming their neighbors. Jefferson was a philosopher, but he was also a politician who knew that words have consequences. The tree of liberty is a fragile thing. It needs water, sure. But it also needs a stable environment to grow, or the "manure" just ends up killing the roots.