You walk into any grocery store today and you’ll see those little green packets everywhere. It’s hard to imagine a world where this plant was actually considered a dangerous "adulterant," but for decades, that’s exactly what the U.S. government thought. Or at least, that’s what they said. If you’ve ever wondered why was stevia banned, you aren't looking at a simple story of a toxic plant. It’s actually a messy mix of cautious science, fierce lobbying from the sugar and artificial sweetener industries, and a whole lot of bureaucratic red tape that kept the Stevia rebaudiana plant off American shelves for years.
Stevia isn't new. The Guaraní people in Paraguay and Brazil have been using it for centuries to sweeten mate tea and treat heartburn. It's incredibly sweet—about 200 to 300 times sweeter than table sugar—and it has zero calories. That sounds like a dream for a country obsessed with dieting, right? Yet, while Japan was busy using stevia in Coca-Cola as early as the 1970s, the United States was effectively treating it like an illegal substance.
The 1991 crackdown that changed everything
The "ban" most people talk about happened in 1991. It wasn't just a quiet memo. The FDA issued an import alert that basically told customs agents to stop stevia at the border. They didn't just stop the refined powder; they stopped the leaves, too. If you were a health food store owner in the early 90s trying to sell stevia as a tea, you were looking at potential seizure of your products.
Why?
The official line from the FDA was that there wasn't enough "toxicological data" to prove it was safe. They pointed to a few old studies, specifically one from 1985 involving rats, which suggested that high doses of steviol (a component of stevia) might have mutagenic properties. Essentially, they were worried it could cause cancer or reproductive issues. But here is the kicker: the doses given to those rats were astronomical. You’d have to drink hundreds of gallons of stevia-sweetened soda a day to hit those levels.
Follow the money: Was it the sugar lobby?
Honestly, you can't talk about why was stevia banned without talking about the competition. In the 80s and 90s, the artificial sweetener market was dominated by aspartame (NutraSweet) and saccharin. These were multi-billion dollar industries. When a natural, calorie-free herb starts gaining traction, it threatens the bottom line of companies that spent hundreds of millions getting their synthetic chemicals approved.
🔗 Read more: Why Doing Leg Lifts on a Pull Up Bar is Harder Than You Think
Many herbalists and industry insiders at the time, like James May—the founder of Wisdom Natural Brands—insisted that the FDA was being pressured. May famously told stories of FDA inspectors coming into his office and telling him he couldn't even mention that stevia was "sweet." He had to sell it as a "skin conditioner" or a "dietary supplement" just to keep it on the shelves. There was even a bizarre moment where the FDA reportedly ordered the destruction of cookbooks that mentioned stevia because they "promoted" an unapproved food additive.
It felt targeted. While the FDA was busy blocking a leaf, they were approving synthetic sweeteners left and right. This created a massive divide between the holistic health community and federal regulators that still exists today.
The "Dietary Supplement" loophole
In 1994, things shifted slightly with the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA). This law was a game-changer. It basically said the FDA couldn't ban things like herbs and minerals as easily as they could ban food additives.
Because of DSHEA, stevia was allowed back in the U.S., but only if it was labeled as a "dietary supplement." You could buy it, but the manufacturer couldn't put it in a box of cereal or a bottle of juice. They couldn't even call it a sweetener on the label. It was this weird period where everyone knew what it was for, but the packaging had to be vague. "Add to your favorite beverage for wellness," or some other legalistic jargon.
What changed in 2008?
So, how did we get from "dangerous adulterant" to "Starbucks staple"? Two words: Big Soda.
💡 You might also like: Why That Reddit Blackhead on Nose That Won’t Pop Might Not Actually Be a Blackhead
By the mid-2000s, giants like Cargill and Merisant (the makers of Equal) joined forces with Coca-Cola and PepsiCo. They developed a highly refined extract of the plant called Rebaudioside A, or Reb A. This isn't the whole leaf; it's a specific chemical isolate.
Cargill submitted extensive research to the FDA for their product, Truvia. Suddenly, with the weight of global corporations behind the research, the "lack of data" problem disappeared. In December 2008, the FDA issued a "No Objection" letter. This didn't mean they approved "stevia" as a whole. It meant they gave GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status to specific, highly refined stevia extracts.
The nuances of safety: What the studies actually say
If we look at the science objectively, the FDA's original concerns weren't entirely made up of thin air, even if they were exaggerated. Some early studies on male rats suggested that very high concentrations of stevia could reduce fertility. Other studies looked at how the gut bacteria breaks down steviol glycosides into steviol, which can be toxic in massive quantities.
However, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) eventually set an Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI). They determined that $4$ milligrams per kilogram of body weight is perfectly safe. For a person weighing $70$ kg, that’s about $280$ mg of pure steviol glycosides a day. That is a lot of sweetness.
Current status of different stevia forms:
- Purified Stevia Extracts (Reb A): These are GRAS and legal for use in all foods and drinks.
- Crude Stevia Extracts: These are still technically not "approved" for use in food because the FDA claims the data is inconsistent.
- Whole-Leaf Stevia: You can buy this as a supplement, but it is still not permitted as a "food additive" or sweetener in processed foods.
The FDA remains stubborn about the whole leaf. They argue that because the leaf contains many different compounds, they can't guarantee its safety the way they can with a 99% pure chemical extract. It's a classic case of the "reductionist" approach to science—taking one part of a plant and calling it safe while being suspicious of the plant itself.
📖 Related: Egg Supplement Facts: Why Powdered Yolks Are Actually Taking Over
Why people still have doubts
Even though it’s legal now, the history of the ban has left a bad taste in some people’s mouths—and I’m not just talking about the bitter aftertaste some people get from the sweetener. There's a lingering distrust. If it was "dangerous" in 1991 and "safe" in 2008, what changed? Was it the science, or was it the fact that Coca-Cola wanted to use it?
There's also the issue of processing. The "natural" sweetener you buy in the store isn't just crushed leaves. It goes through a multi-step extraction process using alcohols or ion-exchange resins. For many purists, this takes the "nature" out of the product.
Furthermore, many commercial stevia blends like Truvia or Stevia in the Raw are mostly erythritol or dextrose. Stevia is so sweet that a tiny amount is all you need; the rest of the powder in the packet is just "bulking agent" so you feel like you're pouring something. If you're sensitive to sugar alcohols like erythritol, you might get digestive upset, which people often blame on the stevia itself.
How to use stevia safely and effectively
If you’re looking to swap sugar for stevia, don't just grab the first green box you see.
Check the ingredients first. If the first ingredient is dextrose or maltodextrin, you’re basically buying a packet of starch with a hint of stevia. Look for "Organic Stevia Extract" or "Pure Reb A" if you want to avoid additives.
The bitterness some people complain about is usually a result of using too much. Because it’s so potent, the "sweetness receptors" on your tongue can get overwhelmed, triggering the "bitter receptors" right next to them. Start with a tiny drop or a pinch.
Actionable steps for the consumer:
- Identify the source: If you want the least processed version, look for green stevia powder (the dried, ground leaf). Just remember, this is technically a "supplement" in the eyes of the law and won't dissolve well in cold drinks.
- Watch for fillers: Many "liquid stevia" products contain alcohol or glycerine. If you have a sensitive stomach, look for alcohol-free versions.
- Check the ADI: Don't go overboard. While it's safe, it is still a potent substance. Stick to a few servings a day.
- Understand the "Ban": Realize that "banned" usually means "unregulated" or "unapproved as a food additive." You can grow stevia in your garden right now in most climates; the "ban" was always about commercial sale and labeling.
Ultimately, the story of stevia's ban is a window into how the FDA operates. It’s a slow-moving machine that is heavily influenced by petitioning and massive data sets that only large corporations can afford to produce. It wasn't that the plant changed; it was that the right people finally decided it was profitable enough to "prove" it was safe.