Michael Bay’s fifth outing with giant robots was supposed to be a beginning. Honestly, it ended up being the opposite. Transformers The Last Knight 2017 hit theaters with a massive $217 million budget and a writers' room that looked like a Hollywood Dream Team, yet it became the definitive "jumping the shark" moment for the live-action series. You’ve probably seen the clips of Optimus Prime with purple eyes trying to decapitate Bumblebee. That image was everywhere in the marketing, promising a dark, emotional turn that the movie never quite figured out how to ground in reality.
It's a weird one to revisit.
On one hand, the technical achievement is staggering. Bay shot this thing with two IMAX 3D cameras rigged together, meaning the visual depth is technically superior to almost anything else in the genre. But on the other hand, the plot is a dizzying sprint through Arthurian legend, Nazi-occupied Europe, and deep-sea submarine chases that leaves most viewers wondering if they missed a whole movie in between scenes.
The Secret History Nobody Asked For
The biggest swing the film takes involves the "Witwiccan" mythology. Basically, the movie claims that Transformers have been on Earth for centuries, helping humans win every major war. We see Ironhide in the trenches of WWI and a clockwork Transformer murdering Nazis. It’s a lot. Anthony Hopkins plays Sir Edmund Burton, and he carries the heavy lifting of explaining why King Arthur’s knights were actually hanging out with a giant mechanical dragon.
Hopkins is clearly having the time of his life, which is the only reason those exposition scenes work at all. He’s yelling at Mark Wahlberg—who returns as Cade Yeager—while a robot butler named Cogman provides comic relief. Cogman is a "headmaster" who doesn't actually have a head to swap with, a detail that bothered lore purists to no end.
The film tries to bridge the gap between the soft reboot of Age of Extinction and a grander, more cosmic scale. We get the introduction of Quintessa, a "Prime" creator who brainwashes Optimus into becoming Nemesis Prime. This is where the marketing leaned in hard. "Rethink your heroes," the posters screamed. But in the actual 154-minute runtime, the "Evil Optimus" subplot feels like a footnote. He shows up, fights Bumblebee for a few minutes, hears Bee's real voice, and immediately snaps out of it. It’s fast. Maybe too fast.
✨ Don't miss: Bob Hearts Abishola Season 4 Explained: The Move That Changed Everything
Why the Box Office Told a Different Story
Before this movie, the Transformers brand was an unstoppable juggernaut. Both Dark of the Moon and Age of Extinction cleared a billion dollars. Transformers The Last Knight 2017 stopped at roughly $605 million.
That’s a massive drop.
Audiences were finally feeling "Bayhem" fatigue. The chaotic editing style, which usually served as a shot of adrenaline, started to feel exhausting. There’s a scene in the second act where the aspect ratio changes almost every time the camera cuts—from wide-screen to IMAX-tall—and once you notice it, you can’t unsee it. It makes the viewing experience feel disjointed.
Critics were brutal. Rotten Tomatoes saw the film plummet to a 16% score. Even the core fanbase, usually loyal to the "big robots hitting each other" formula, felt the bloat. The movie tried to be a historical epic, a sci-fi thriller, and a slapstick comedy all at once. When you try to please everyone, you usually end up confusing them.
- The budget was astronomical, yet the ROI was the lowest in the series' history.
- The runtime was criticized for being overstuffed with human subplots that went nowhere (like the TRF military group).
- It introduced Unicron—the biggest villain in the franchise—as being the Earth itself, then left that massive cliffhanger completely unresolved.
A Technical Marvel in a Narrative Mess
If you ignore the script for a second, the CGI in Transformers The Last Knight 2017 is still some of the best ever put to film. Industrial Light & Magic (ILM) did things here that still look better than most Marvel movies today. The way the light hits the scratched metal on Hot Rod or the complex transformation of Dragonstorm is objectively impressive.
🔗 Read more: Black Bear by Andrew Belle: Why This Song Still Hits So Hard
The sound design, too, is top-tier. Every metallic clink and engine roar is layered. But great sound doesn't fix a narrative that feels like it was written by five different people who weren't allowed to talk to each other. One minute you're in an emotional scene about Cade's daughter, and the next, a robot is making a joke about dating. It’s tonal whiplash.
The introduction of Izabella (played by Isabela Merced) was an attempt to bring a younger "Amblin-esque" feel to the movie. She’s great, and her bond with the damaged robot Canopy is one of the few moments of genuine heart. Unfortunately, she gets sidelined once the plot shifts to the UK and the search for Merlin’s staff.
The Legacy and the Pivot to Bumblebee
The failure of this movie to hit a billion dollars changed everything for Hasbro and Paramount. It was the "Check Engine" light for the whole franchise. They realized that bigger isn't always better.
Shortly after, the studio scrapped plans for Transformers 6 (which would have followed the Unicron reveal) and pivoted to the Bumblebee solo movie. That film was the polar opposite: small, character-driven, and set in the 80s. It worked. It proved that people liked the robots, but they needed to care about the people standing next to them.
Transformers The Last Knight 2017 remains a fascinating artifact of the "peak blockbuster" era. It represents the absolute limit of how much CGI and "lore" you can cram into a single frame before the structure collapses. It’s loud, it’s beautiful, it’s confusing, and it’s undeniably Michael Bay at his most unfiltered.
💡 You might also like: Billie Eilish Therefore I Am Explained: The Philosophy Behind the Mall Raid
If you're going to watch it today, do it on the biggest screen possible. Don't worry too much about why the characters are in a specific location or how the timeline fits with the 2007 original. Just watch the metal move. The movie doesn't care about its own internal logic, so you shouldn't either.
How to Approach the Movie Today
To get the most out of a rewatch or a first-time viewing, you have to treat it like a visual gallery rather than a linear story. The cinematography by Jonathan Sela is genuinely gorgeous, especially the shots of the Scottish Highlands.
- Watch the IMAX version: If you can find the version with shifting aspect ratios, it’s the way Bay intended. It’s disorienting but visually striking.
- Focus on the Animation: Look at the "background" robots in the junkyard scenes. The level of detail in their idle movements is where the real artistry lies.
- Ignore the Timeline: Trying to reconcile this movie with the previous four will give you a headache. Treat it as a standalone fever dream.
- Listen for the Score: Steve Jablonsky’s music is, as always, the unsung hero of these movies. The track "Stay" is a highlight.
The era of the "Bay-formers" essentially ended here. While Rise of the Beasts eventually brought back the spectacle, it never quite reached the sheer, chaotic scale of what was attempted in 2017. Whether that’s a good or bad thing depends entirely on how much you enjoy watching Stonehenge get turned into a weapon of mass destruction.
The film serves as a perfect case study for film students and marketing execs alike. It shows that even the most powerful IPs have a breaking point when the spectacle outpaces the soul. If you want to understand where modern blockbusters went wrong—and where they found their technical ceiling—this is the movie to study.
Check the special features on the Blu-ray if you’re into the technical side of things. The "brailing" technique used for the 3D cameras is wild. It explains why the movie looks so crisp even when everything on screen is exploding. After that, compare the storytelling here to Bumblebee to see exactly how the industry corrected course. It's the most dramatic "vibe shift" in modern franchise history.