Technology moves fast. In 1998, people thought the Will Smith movie Enemy of the State was just a slick, high-budget popcorn flick. It had all the hallmarks of a Jerry Bruckheimer production: fast cuts, a pulsing score by Trevor Rabin and Harry Gregson-Williams, and Smith at the absolute peak of his "Fresh Prince turned action hero" charisma. But if you watch it today, the movie feels less like an action-thriller and more like a terrifyingly accurate documentary about the future.
We’re living in the world that Tony Scott warned us about.
The plot is deceptively simple. Robert Clayton Dean (Smith) is a labor lawyer who gets caught in a web of government corruption after a chance encounter with an old friend. That friend, played by Jason Lee, drops a disc into Dean's shopping bag. On that disc? Evidence of a political assassination ordered by NSA official Thomas Brian Reynolds, played with chilling, bureaucratic coldness by Jon Voight.
From that moment on, Dean’s life is dismantled. Not with guns, at least not at first, but with data.
The Will Smith movie Enemy of the State predicted the death of privacy
Most people remember the "shaker" scene. You know the one. The NSA tech team uses satellite imagery to rotate a 2D frame into a 3D model to see what’s inside a shopping bag. Back then, we laughed. We called it "movie magic" or "technobabble."
Honestly? It kind of was at the time. But the underlying philosophy—the idea that there is no corner of a city where you aren't being watched—is our daily reality in 2026.
The film focused heavily on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). In the movie, Reynolds is trying to push through a new piece of legislation that would drastically expand the government's power to monitor domestic communications. It’s impossible to watch those scenes without thinking about the real-world PATRIOT Act that arrived just three years after the film's release.
Director Tony Scott wasn't just guessing. He hired actual technical consultants who had worked for the NSA and in private surveillance. They told him what was possible, and more importantly, what was becoming possible.
Gene Hackman and the Bridge to 'The Conversation'
One of the coolest things about this movie is the unofficial cinematic universe it creates. Gene Hackman plays Brill, a disgruntled, paranoid ex-NSA operative who lives in a "faraday cage" (a wire-mesh room that blocks electronic signals).
Film nerds will tell you that Brill is basically an older version of Harry Caul, the character Hackman played in Francis Ford Coppola's 1974 masterpiece The Conversation.
🔗 Read more: Christian Bale as Bruce Wayne: Why His Performance Still Holds Up in 2026
Even the casting feels intentional. In The Conversation, Hackman is the one doing the bugging. In the Will Smith movie Enemy of the State, he’s the one hiding from the bugs. It shows the evolution of surveillance from grainy audio tapes to orbital satellites and digital footprints.
Brill explains to Dean that the government has been "capable of this for twenty years." He tells him about the "Building 500" guys and the way they can reconstruct a life just by looking at credit card swipes and phone metadata.
It's grim.
Why the technology in the film holds up (and why it doesn't)
Let’s talk about the gadgets.
The NSA team uses these GPS tracking bugs that they hide in Dean's clothes, his shoes, and even his pen. In 1998, the idea of a GPS tracker small enough to fit in a shoe heel was high-tech. Today, you can buy an AirTag for thirty bucks and do the same thing.
The "omnipresent" satellite coverage is the part that feels most dated, yet most relevant. The movie depicts the NSA as having a dedicated satellite for almost every square inch of DC, capable of zooming in on a mole on a man's face in real-time. In reality, orbital mechanics don't quite work that way—satellites move. You can't just "hover" over a car chase indefinitely without a massive network of low-earth orbit satellites.
Guess what we have now? Starlink.
The film also captures the "social engineering" aspect of surveillance beautifully. The way the NSA agents ruin Dean's reputation is arguably more effective than their attempts to kill him. They leak a story to the press. They freeze his bank accounts. They make it look like he’s having an affair.
They don't just find the truth; they manufacture a convenient lie.
💡 You might also like: Chris Robinson and The Bold and the Beautiful: What Really Happened to Jack Hamilton
The cast that made a "tech thriller" human
Will Smith deserves a lot of credit here. Before this, he was the guy fighting aliens in Independence Day or quipping in Bad Boys. Here, he’s vulnerable. He’s scared. He spends half the movie running in his bathrobe, looking genuinely confused about how his life vanished in twenty-four hours.
Then you have the supporting cast. It’s a "who’s who" of late-90s talent:
- Regina King as Dean's wife, Carla, who provides the moral anchor.
- Jack Black and Seth Green as the "cool" tech nerds in the surveillance van.
- Barry Pepper and Ian Hart as the cold-blooded field agents.
- Tom Sizemore as the mob boss who inadvertently helps Dean in the explosive finale.
The chemistry between Smith and Hackman is what carries the second half. It’s a classic "buddy cop" dynamic, but with a cynical twist. Brill doesn't want to help Dean. He thinks Dean is a "pollyanna" who doesn't understand that the Fourth Amendment is a ghost.
Looking back at the ending: A messy, perfect solution
The finale of the Will Smith movie Enemy of the State is famous for its "Mexican Standoff."
Instead of Dean becoming a super-spy and shooting his way out, he uses the "enemy of my enemy" strategy. He leads the NSA agents directly into a restaurant owned by a mob boss he was investigating earlier in the film.
It’s chaotic. It’s loud. It’s very Jerry Bruckheimer.
But it’s also a smart piece of writing. Dean realizes he can't beat the system by playing by the rules. He has to collide two different types of "shadow worlds"—the criminal underworld and the government surveillance state—and let them destroy each other.
The movie ends on a somewhat somber note. Dean is cleared, but the surveillance bill still has a chance of passing. Brill disappears back into the shadows. The final shot is Dean watching a news report, realizing that while he won his personal battle, the larger war for privacy was probably already lost.
Practical takeaways from Robert Clayton Dean's nightmare
You probably aren't being tracked by the NSA because you accidentally swapped bags with a guy at a lingerie store. Still, the movie offers some weirdly practical advice for the digital age.
📖 Related: Chase From Paw Patrol: Why This German Shepherd Is Actually a Big Deal
1. Watch your metadata. In the film, they track Dean through his "breadline"—every time he uses a card, they find him. In 2026, your phone is doing this constantly. If you value privacy, turn off significant locations in your settings and use privacy-focused browsers.
2. Physical security still matters. Brill’s "copper mesh" room was a Faraday cage. While you don't need to line your house with copper, using RFID-blocking wallets or signal-blocking bags for your keys (to prevent relay attacks on cars) is a modern version of Brill’s paranoia.
3. The "Middle Man" is the most vulnerable. The movie shows that the government didn't go after the "big fish" first. They destroyed the people around them. They used Dean’s wife and his former flame (Rachel Banks) to get to him. Be mindful of what you share about others online; your lack of privacy can become someone else's problem.
4. Check your devices. The scene where Dean strips off his clothes to find the bugs is iconic. Periodically checking which apps have permission to use your microphone, camera, and location is the 21st-century version of checking your shoe for a transmitter.
5. Question the "Safety vs. Privacy" narrative. The villain, Reynolds, justifies everything by saying he’s protecting the country. "As much privacy as is required," he says. That debate hasn't changed. Whenever a new "security" law is proposed, remember Jon Voight’s character.
The Will Smith movie Enemy of the State isn't just a relic of 1998. It’s a blueprint. It’s a warning that we mostly ignored. The next time you see a "smart city" advertisement or a new facial recognition feature on your phone, think about Robert Clayton Dean running through the streets of DC.
He wasn't running from the law. He was running from an algorithm.
To stay ahead of the curve, start by auditing your digital footprint. Use a password manager, enable two-factor authentication (not via SMS), and maybe, just maybe, don't trust the government when they say they only want to "keep you safe."
The technology has caught up to the fiction. Now it’s up to us to decide if we care.
Next Steps for the Privacy-Conscious:
- Audit your permissions: Go into your phone settings right now and see how many apps have "Always On" location access. Switch them to "While Using" or "Never."
- Encrypt your comms: Use end-to-end encrypted messaging like Signal for sensitive conversations.
- Research FISA: Read up on the actual Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to see how art mirrored life.
- Watch 'The Conversation' (1974): To see where the DNA of this movie really started. It’s a slower burn but worth it for the perspective.