The global economy is basically a giant game of chicken. For years, the US and China have been locked in a cycle of tariffs, handshake deals, and sudden "wait, what?" moments that leave markets reeling. When people talk about the US-China trade talks agreement, they usually mean the Phase One deal signed back in January 2020. It was supposed to be the start of something big. It wasn't. Honestly, it was more of a temporary ceasefire than a peace treaty, and we are still living with the fallout today.
Money talks.
Whenever these two superpowers sit down at a table, the world holds its breath because the stakes are genuinely massive. We're talking about trillions in trade volume. Most folks think the trade war ended when the ink dried on that 90-page document, but that is a total misconception. If you look at the data from the Peterson Institute for International Economics (PIIE), China fell significantly short of its purchase commitments. They promised to buy an extra $200 billion in US goods. They didn't get anywhere close.
What Actually Happened With the US-China Trade Talks Agreement?
It's complicated.
The core of the US-China trade talks agreement focused on several "pillars." Intellectual property protection, technology transfer, agriculture, and financial services were the big ones. The US wanted China to stop forcing American companies to hand over their tech secrets just to do business in Shanghai or Beijing. China wanted the tariffs to go away.
Neither side got exactly what they wanted.
Katherine Tai, the US Trade Representative, has been pretty vocal about the "limitations" of this bilateral approach. The agreement had a "dispute resolution" mechanism, which is basically a fancy way of saying "we will talk about it if someone breaks the rules." But without a neutral third party like the WTO involved in the enforcement of Phase One, it was mostly just two giants shouting at each other across a table.
The Purchase Goal Reality Check
Let's look at the numbers because they don't lie. Chad Bown at PIIE tracked this meticulously. China was supposed to buy specific amounts of manufactured goods, energy, and agricultural products.
By the end of 2021, China had only reached about 57% of the targets they committed to. Some people blame the pandemic. Others say the targets were unrealistic from day one. Whatever the reason, the "agreement" looked a lot better on paper than it did in the actual shipping ports of Long Beach or Ningbo-Zhoushan.
- Soybeans and Corn: Agriculture was the one semi-bright spot, but even then, it was hit-or-miss.
- Boeing Jets: A huge part of the "manufactured goods" quota relied on aircraft sales. Those basically stalled out due to a mix of the 737 MAX issues and political tension.
- Energy: China was supposed to ramp up imports of US liquefied natural gas (LNG). It happened, but slowly.
Why the Tech War Eclipsed the Trade Deal
You've probably noticed that the conversation has shifted. It’s not just about soy and steel anymore. It’s about chips.
Even while the US-China trade talks agreement was technically "active," the US started slapping massive restrictions on high-end semiconductors. This is where the agreement started to feel like a relic of a different era. You can’t really have a "friendly" trade agreement while simultaneously trying to cut off your partner's access to the most important technology of the 21st century.
The "Entity List" became the new tariff.
Huawei, SMIC, and dozens of other Chinese firms found themselves in the crosshairs. This created a weird paradox. On one hand, officials were meeting to discuss "Phase One" compliance. On the other, the Department of Commerce was tightening the screws on supply chains. It’s like trying to agree on a grocery list while one person is locking the other out of the kitchen.
The Enforcement Problem
The agreement lacked teeth. Usually, trade deals have a "snapback" provision where tariffs go back up if targets aren't met. But because the relationship became so toxic, using those snapbacks felt like declaring total economic war. So, the US kept most of the Section 301 tariffs in place anyway.
Biden didn't scrap them.
Trump started them, but the current administration has largely kept the pressure on, citing China's non-market practices. This is the nuance most people miss: the agreement didn't actually lower the cost of living for most Americans. It just stabilized the chaos for a minute.
Misconceptions About the "De-risking" Era
People love to say we are "decoupling" from China. That’s a bit of an exaggeration. Honestly, if you look at the trade deficit, it’s still massive. We aren't breaking up; we're just moving into separate bedrooms.
The US-China trade talks agreement was supposed to bridge this gap, but instead, it highlighted how different the two systems are. The US operates on a market-driven model. China operates on a state-led model. When the US asks China to "buy more stuff," the Chinese government literally has to order state-owned enterprises to place orders. That’s not how free trade is supposed to work, and it’s why these agreements are so hard to maintain long-term.
📖 Related: Jack Sherman Binghamton NY: Why the Local Legend Still Matters
Structural Changes vs. Surface Gains
The US pushed for structural changes in China. Things like:
- Ending the practice of "forced technology transfer."
- Opening up the financial sector (which China actually did to some extent).
- Improving IP protections for pharmaceutical patents.
While China did pass some new laws—like the 2019 Foreign Investment Law—enforcement remains a huge question mark for American CEOs on the ground. A law in Beijing doesn't always translate to fairness in a provincial court.
What This Means for Your Business Today
If you're importing goods, you already know the deal. The US-China trade talks agreement didn't solve the tariff issue. Most of those "List 3" and "List 4" tariffs are still there. You're likely paying 10% or 25% extra on your COGS (Cost of Goods Sold), and that isn't changing anytime soon.
Supply chains are migrating.
Vietnam, Mexico, and India are the big winners here. Not because they are cheaper than China—often they aren't—but because they offer "geopolitical insurance." The failure of the trade talks to produce a "Phase Two" deal signaled to the market that the tension is permanent.
Business leaders have stopped waiting for a grand bargain. They’ve realized that the "agreement" was the ceiling, not the floor.
The Role of Currency
Let's talk about the Yuan (RMB). Part of the trade talks involved "transparency" regarding currency manipulation. The US has long complained that China keeps its currency artificially low to make its exports cheaper. While the agreement included a chapter on this, the reality is that the exchange rate is still heavily influenced by the People's Bank of China (PBOC). When the US Fed hikes rates, and the PBOC cuts them, the gap widens, making the "trade agreement" goals even harder to reach.
It’s all connected. You can’t fix trade without fixing finance, and you can’t fix finance without trust.
Actionable Insights for Navigating the Post-Agreement World
The US-China trade talks agreement taught us that political promises rarely survive economic reality. If you are an investor or a business owner, you need to stop looking for the "end" of the trade war and start learning how to live inside it.
Audit your Tier 2 and Tier 3 suppliers. You might think you’ve diversified because you buy from a factory in Vietnam. But where does that factory get its raw materials? Often, it’s still China. If the US-China relationship hits another snag, your "diversified" supply chain might still be at risk.
Watch the "Dual-Use" lists.
The government is increasingly focusing on products that have both civilian and military applications. Even if you're in a seemingly "safe" industry like consumer electronics, your components might fall under new export controls that the trade agreement didn't cover.
🔗 Read more: What Really Happened With Mortgage Rates This Week: The Six-Week Climb Is Finally Over
Hedge your currency risk.
With the US and China moving in different directions regarding interest rates, the volatility of the USD/CNY pair is going to stay high. Talk to your bank about forward contracts or options if you have significant payables in China.
Monitor USTR Exclusions.
Occasionally, the US Trade Representative opens windows to apply for tariff exclusions. These are lifeboats. If your product isn't made anywhere else, you can sometimes get your 25% tariff waived, but you have to be proactive and stay on top of the Federal Register filings.
The trade agreement isn't a dead letter, but it's certainly on life support. The future of trade isn't about one big agreement; it's about a thousand small skirmishes over data, chips, and green energy. Understanding that the Phase One deal was a temporary band-aid is the first step toward building a resilient business strategy in 2026.
Focus on agility rather than hoping for a return to the "free trade" era of the early 2000s. That world is gone. The new world is about "friend-shoring," "de-risking," and keeping your eyes wide open.