It was supposed to be the triumphant return of a legend. When the Upstairs Downstairs 2010 TV series was announced by the BBC, period drama fans basically lost their minds. The original 1970s run wasn’t just a show; it was a cultural monolith that defined the "servant-master" genre long before streaming was even a glimmer in a tech mogul's eye. But then, something happened. A little show called Downton Abbey premiered on ITV just months earlier, and suddenly, the 165 Eaton Place revival found itself fighting for air in a room that was already crowded with corsets and silver polish.
Honestly, it’s a bit of a tragedy.
The 2010 revival had everything going for it on paper. Jean Marsh, the co-creator and the original Rose Buck, was back. Eileen Atkins, the other co-creator, was starring as the formidable Maud, Lady Holland. They had the pedigree. They had the history. But if you look back at the 2010-2012 run now, it feels like a fever dream of missed opportunities and behind-the-scenes drama that overshadowed the actual scripts.
The Impossible Task of Reclaiming 165 Eaton Place
Bringing back a classic is always a gamble. You've got the old guard who wants everything to stay exactly the same, and then you've got the new viewers who don't know a scullery maid from a lady's maid. The Upstairs Downstairs 2010 TV series tried to bridge that gap by setting the action in 1936.
The world was changing. Fast.
The story picks up six years after the original series ended. The house at 165 Eaton Place has been empty, gathering dust and ghosts, until Sir Hallam Holland (played by Ed Stoppard) moves in with his wife, Lady Agnes (Keeley Hawes). It’s a smart setup. It allows the show to tackle the rise of fascism, the abdication crisis of Edward VIII, and the looming threat of World War II. These aren't just background details; they are the engine of the plot.
But there was a problem.
👉 See also: The Real Story Behind I Can Do Bad All by Myself: From Stage to Screen
The pacing felt... frantic. While the original series had dozens of episodes to breathe, the 2010 version was handed a three-episode miniseries for its first "series." You can't build a legacy in three hours. Not when your rival over on ITV is doing a slow-burn romance between Matthew and Mary that’s capturing the global zeitgeist. By the time the BBC realized they had a hit and ordered a full second series of six episodes, the momentum had shifted.
Casting Brillance and the "Downton" Comparison
Let's talk about the cast, because it was genuinely stellar. Claire Foy—long before she was the Queen in The Crown—played Lady Persephone, the rebellious, pro-Nazi younger sister. She was electric. You also had Tom Ellis (of Lucifer fame) as a charismatic doctor. The talent wasn't the issue.
The issue was that every time a viewer tuned in, they were subconsciously checking a mental list.
Is Mr. Pritchard as good as Mr. Hudson? Is the kitchen as lively as Mrs. Patmore’s? The answer was usually "it's different," but in the world of TV ratings, "different" can feel like "disappointing." The Upstairs Downstairs 2010 TV series was more political than Downton. It was grit-ier. It dealt with the British Union of Fascists and the Kindertransport. It wasn't interested in being a warm hug; it wanted to be a sharp nudge.
Why the Second Series Stumbled
If you talk to die-hard fans, they'll point to the second series as the moment the wheels started to wobble. First, they lost Eileen Atkins. Her departure was a massive blow. Rumors swirled about her being unhappy with the scripts, and losing that central, witty matriarchal figure left a hole that couldn't be filled by mere set dressing.
Then, Jean Marsh suffered a stroke and a heart attack just as filming began.
It was a nightmare scenario. Rose Buck, the literal soul of the show, had to be written out of most scenes, appearing only briefly in a sanatorium. Without Rose and Maud, the "Downstairs" half of the show felt unanchored. The balance was gone. The show became heavily tilted toward the "Upstairs" drama of Hallam’s crumbling marriage and his flirtation with his sister-in-law. People didn't tune in to Upstairs Downstairs for a standard soap opera; they wanted the intricate social hierarchy that the title promised.
✨ Don't miss: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa
The Scripting Identity Crisis
The writing, led by Heidi Thomas (who went on to create Call the Midwife), was often beautiful but felt rushed. In the second series, they tried to cram in:
- The arrival of a new nursery maid with a secret.
- A forbidden romance between a servant and a lady.
- Intelligence work for the Foreign Office.
- A burgeoning affair between Sir Hallam and Persie.
- The death of a major character.
- The preparations for war.
It was too much.
When you look at the Upstairs Downstairs 2010 TV series through the lens of history, it’s clear the BBC was trying to compete with the scale of a big-budget US production on a British license-fee budget. The sets were gorgeous—the art deco touches in Lady Agnes’s bedroom were stunning—but the heart was sometimes obscured by the frantic need to be "important."
What Most People Get Wrong About the 2010 Version
A lot of critics at the time called it a "Downton clone." That’s actually factually incorrect and kinda insulting. Upstairs Downstairs was the blueprint. Without the 1971 original, Downton Abbey wouldn't exist. The 2010 version wasn't copying Julian Fellowes; it was trying to reclaim its own throne.
The 2010 series was actually much more daring in its historical accuracy. It didn't shy away from the fact that many members of the British aristocracy were sympathetic to Germany in the late 30s. It showed the ugliness of the East End riots. It was a show about the end of an era, whereas Downton often felt like a celebration of one.
Key Differences in Tone:
- Politics: The 2010 series was deeply embedded in the Foreign Office and the reality of the Blitz.
- Class Friction: It felt more realistic about the resentment of the working class. Servants weren't always "happy to serve."
- The Ending: While Downton ended with a series of tidy weddings, the 2010 series ended with the house being boarded up and the characters scattering into the uncertainty of war.
The Legacy of the 2010 Revival
Was it a failure? Ratings-wise, it didn't hit the heights the BBC hoped for, and it was cancelled after two series. But if you watch it today, it holds up remarkably well as a character study. Ed Stoppard’s portrayal of a man slowly being crushed by the weight of his own integrity (and his wife's ambitions) is subtle and moving.
🔗 Read more: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
Keeley Hawes gave Lady Agnes a vulnerability that saved her from being a "bored rich wife" trope. You actually cared about her struggle to produce an heir and her desperation to keep her family together while the world literally fell apart around them.
The Upstairs Downstairs 2010 TV series serves as a bridge. It connects the theatrical, stage-like pacing of 70s television with the cinematic, high-gloss expectations of the modern era. It might have been "the other show" for a few years, but it has a bite that many period dramas lack.
How to Watch and What to Look For
If you’re diving into this for the first time, don't go in expecting a replica of the original. Go in for the 1930s atmosphere. The costume design alone is worth the price of admission.
Things to pay attention to:
- The Soundscape: The way the house sounds—the bells, the echoing hallways—is used as a character itself.
- Claire Foy’s Performance: You can see the seeds of her future greatness here. She plays "unlikable" with a fascinating magnetism.
- The Final Scene: It’s one of the most poignant endings to a period drama in the last twenty years. No spoilers, but keep the tissues handy.
To truly appreciate the Upstairs Downstairs 2010 TV series, you have to stop comparing it to what came before or what was airing on the other channel. It’s a standalone story about a house that saw the world change and the people who tried—and failed—to keep the doors locked against the future.
If you're looking to watch the series today, it's often available on streaming services like BritBox or Amazon Prime, depending on your region. It's a quick binge—only nine episodes in total. Start with the 1971 pilot if you want the full context, but the 2010 version stands on its own feet remarkably well. Pay close attention to the character of Mr. Pritchard, played by Adrian Scarborough; his performance as the butler is perhaps the most nuanced take on the role since the legendary Gordon Jackson.
Next, check the production credits for the historical advisors used during filming. The attention to detail regarding 1930s etiquette and the specific political tensions of the "Cliveden Set" provides a wealth of rabbit holes for any history buff to fall down. If you want to see where the actors went next, look up the 2012 casting announcements for The Crown and Lucifer—the 2010 series was a massive springboard for British talent.