It happened in 56 minutes. That’s the thing people usually forget when they talk about September 11. While the North Tower stood for over an hour and a half, the South Tower—hit second—fell first. It was a massive, terrifying subversion of what everyone expected that morning. You’ve probably seen the footage a thousand times, that tilting top block of floors suddenly giving way, but the physics behind the twin towers south tower collapse are actually way more complex than just "a plane hit a building."
Honestly, it’s about weight distribution and a very specific "bowing" effect that happened to the perimeter columns.
When United Airlines Flight 175 sliced into the South Tower at 9:03 AM, it wasn't a centered hit. This is crucial. Unlike the North Tower, where the plane went almost directly into the core, the South Tower strike was offset. It banked. The plane ripped through the eastern corner and decimated the south face, basically gutting the structural integrity of the corner support.
The Physics of the South Tower Failure
Structural engineers like Leslie Robertson, who helped design the towers, had actually accounted for jet impacts. But they were thinking of a Boeing 707 lost in the fog, moving slowly. They weren't prepping for a 767-200ER carrying 10,000 gallons of fuel screaming in at over 500 mph.
The kinetic energy alone was staggering.
Basically, the impact severed about 30 out of the 236 perimeter columns on the south face. But the building stayed up. For a while. The "tube-frame" design was actually doing its job, transferring the load of those missing columns to the remaining ones. Think of it like a bridge—if one cable snaps, the others pull harder. But then the fire started. And no, the "jet fuel melts steel beams" meme is scientifically illiterate. Steel doesn't have to melt to fail; it just has to lose its stiffness.
At about 1,100°F (roughly 600°C), structural steel loses about 50% of its strength.
📖 Related: Why the Hello Kitty Murder Still Haunts Hong Kong Decades Later
The fires in the South Tower were fueled by office furniture, paper, and carpeting, fed by a massive influx of oxygen from the gaping hole in the side of the building. Because the impact was lower down (floors 77 through 85) compared to the North Tower, there was significantly more weight—about 30 floors of concrete and steel—pressing down on the weakened zone.
The Sagging Floor Theory
One of the most detailed investigations into the twin towers south tower collapse came from NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology). They found that the long-span floor trusses started to sag significantly due to the heat. As they sagged, they didn't just hang there. They pulled inward on the perimeter columns.
Imagine holding a heavy rope between two poles. If the rope sags in the middle, it pulls the poles toward each other. That’s exactly what happened on the south face.
The columns were already stressed from the weight of the top 30 floors. Now, they were being pulled inward by the floor trusses. Around 9:58 AM, the south face columns began to buckle. Once those gave way, the entire top section of the building began to tilt toward the south and east. It was a literal pivot point.
Why 56 Minutes?
Many people ask why the South Tower collapsed so much faster than the North Tower. The North Tower was hit higher up and lasted 102 minutes.
The answer is simple: gravity.
Because the South Tower was hit lower, the "load" on the damaged section was nearly double what the North Tower’s damaged section had to bear. Also, the speed of the second plane was much higher—around 540 mph versus the North Tower's 440 mph. This meant more immediate structural destruction and a more violent dispersal of jet fuel, which stripped the spray-on fireproofing off the steel almost instantly. Without that "insulation," the steel was naked against the heat.
It was a race against time that the building was never going to win.
When the collapse finally initiated, it wasn't a "free fall" in the vacuum sense, but it was fast. The upper block fell onto the floor below it. The dynamic load—the weight of a moving object—is much higher than the static load. The floor below couldn't stop the momentum of 30 floors falling ten feet. It was a pancaking effect of energy, not necessarily of floors.
Historical Context and Engineering Legacy
We have to talk about the "Hat Truss." This was a massive web of steel at the very top of the buildings designed to support the heavy antennas. Ironically, it actually helped the buildings stand as long as they did by redistributing the load when the core columns were damaged.
👉 See also: Guerra Ucrania últimas noticias: Por qué el invierno de 2026 está cambiando las reglas del juego
Without the hat truss, the twin towers south tower collapse might have happened in twenty minutes instead of nearly an hour.
What we learned from this event changed how we build skyscrapers today. If you look at the One World Trade Center or the Burj Khalifa, the fireproofing is different. It’s no longer a "fluffy" spray-on material that can be knocked off by a vibration. It’s often dense, cementitious material. We also now use "impact-resistant" stairwell enclosures. In the South Tower, only one stairwell (Stairwell A) remained somewhat passable after the impact, and only a handful of people managed to descend from above the impact zone.
Critical Observations from NIST
- The "bowing" of the south wall was captured in photographs minutes before the collapse.
- The collapse was "top-down," initiated by the failure of the impact zone.
- The tilt of the top section reached about 20 to 25 degrees before the building went vertical.
It’s easy to get lost in the conspiracy theories that flood the internet, but the structural reality is much more sobering. It was a combination of extreme kinetic damage, the stripping of fire insulation, and a massive overhead load that eventually forced the steel to its breaking point.
Actionable Insights for Understanding Structural Safety
If you're interested in the technical side of how buildings are made safer after 2001, there are a few things you can look into to see how these lessons are applied in the real world.
Review the NIST NCSTAR 1 Report. This is the definitive federal investigation. It is thousands of pages long but provides the actual data on steel performance and "column failure" that debunks most myths.
Look at Fire Protection Ratings (FPR). If you work in a high-rise, ask about the fireproofing type. Modern buildings use much higher-bond-strength materials than the "mineral wool" used in the original WTC.
Study "Redundancy" in Design. The reason the South Tower didn't fall the second the plane hit was redundancy. Modern skyscrapers now use "strong cores" made of reinforced concrete rather than just steel "tubes" to ensure that even if the exterior is damaged, the heart of the building stays standing.
The twin towers south tower collapse remains one of the most studied mechanical failures in human history. It shifted the paradigm from "how do we keep a building standing" to "how do we ensure people can get out even if the building is failing." That shift in philosophy is why modern skyscrapers are among the safest places you can be during an emergency today.
To better understand the evolution of skyscraper safety, research the "International Building Code (IBC) 2009 updates," which were the first to fully integrate the lessons learned from the WTC towers. You can also examine the "Performance-Based Fire Protection" models used in the construction of the new World Trade Center complex to see how engineers now simulate disaster scenarios before a single beam is placed.