You ever watch a movie and think, "How on earth did this get made?" Honestly, that’s the vibe of the Tune In Tomorrow film. It’s this bizarre, colorful, and slightly chaotic romantic comedy from 1990 that feels like it belongs to a completely different era of filmmaking. It’s got Keanu Reeves before he was an action god, Peter Falk doing some of the most eccentric character work of his career, and Barbara Hershey being, well, Barbara Hershey.
Based on Mario Vargas Llosa’s semi-autobiographical novel Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter, the movie swaps the original Peruvian setting for 1950s New Orleans. It’s a bold choice. Some people hate it. Others think the jazz-soaked atmosphere of Louisiana is the only thing that makes the plot’s absurdity work.
The plot is basically a soap opera about a soap opera
Martin Loader, played by Keanu Reeves, is a low-level news writer at a radio station. He’s young, a bit awkward, and totally smitten with his aunt-by-marriage, Julia. She isn’t actually blood-related, but back in the fifties, this was still enough to make the neighbors whisper. Then enters Pedro Carmichael.
Peter Falk plays Carmichael, a legendary radio play writer who is basically a mad scientist of drama. He starts writing these hyper-dramatic radio serials that everyone in town becomes obsessed with. But here’s the kicker: he starts using Martin’s real-life forbidden romance with Julia as fuel for his scripts.
It’s meta. It’s messy.
The lines between what’s happening in "real life" and what’s being broadcast over the airwaves start to blur. People in the town start reacting to the radio show as if it’s gospel, which in turn influences how Martin and Julia behave. It’s a feedback loop of drama.
Why Keanu Reeves fans usually miss this one
If you’re looking for The Matrix or John Wick, you’re in the wrong place. This is "Ted" Logan trying to be a serious romantic lead, and it’s fascinating to watch. His performance is earnest. Maybe a little too earnest?
🔗 Read more: Anjelica Huston in The Addams Family: What You Didn't Know About Morticia
He was 25 or 26 when this was filmed. He doesn't have that weathered, stoic presence yet. Instead, he’s floppy-haired and perpetually looks like he’s trying to figure out if he’s in a comedy or a tragedy. The chemistry with Barbara Hershey is... interesting. She’s playing a woman who is supposed to be significantly older and more sophisticated, and she carries that weight well. But the real star is the scripts.
Peter Falk is the secret sauce
We have to talk about Peter Falk. Most people know him as Columbo, the guy in the trench coat who just has "one more thing" to ask. In the Tune In Tomorrow film, he is unleashed.
As Pedro Carmichael, Falk is a whirlwind of eccentricities. He hates Albanians for some reason (a running gag from the book that feels even more surreal on screen). He wears disguises. He manipulates everyone around him just to see if it makes for a better "third act."
Without Falk, this movie might have collapsed under its own weight. He provides the energy that keeps the whimsical tone from becoming annoying. He’s the puppet master. When he’s on screen, the movie moves at a clip; when he’s off, it occasionally drags in that way 90s indie films often did.
The New Orleans factor
Director Jon Amiel made a specific choice to set this in New Orleans. The music is incredible. Wynton Marsalis did the score, and you can tell. The brass, the humidity, the slow-moving ceiling fans—it all builds a world where a radio writer becoming a local deity actually feels plausible.
The 1950s setting helps soften the "dating your aunt" aspect of the story. In a modern setting, it would just feel "creepy." In this stylized, Technicolor version of the past, it feels like a "forbidden affair." It’s a subtle distinction, but it’s the only reason the movie doesn't feel totally gross.
💡 You might also like: Isaiah Washington Movies and Shows: Why the Star Still Matters
What most people get wrong about the adaptation
Purists often complain that the Tune In Tomorrow film butchers the Vargas Llosa novel. They aren't entirely wrong. The book is much darker. It deals with the complexities of Latin American society and the actual obsession with telenovelas.
By moving it to the U.S., the film loses some of that political and social bite. It becomes a quirky rom-com rather than a sharp satire. But if you judge it as its own thing? It’s a decent piece of magical realism-lite.
- The movie leans into the "screwball" comedy elements.
- It prioritizes the romance over the social commentary.
- The ending is significantly more "Hollywood" than the source material.
Is that a bad thing? Not necessarily. It just makes it a different beast. It’s a movie about the power of storytelling and how we often let narratives dictate our reality.
The legacy of a forgotten cult classic
You won't find this movie on many "Best of the 90s" lists. It didn't set the box office on fire. But it has this weird, staying power for people who stumbled across it on cable TV in the mid-90s.
It’s a reminder of a time when studios would give mid-budget money to weird, literary adaptations. We don't get many of those anymore. Nowadays, this would be a six-episode limited series on a streaming platform, and it would probably be stretched way too thin. At 107 minutes, the film is just the right length for its own absurdity.
Specific details you might have missed
The radio play segments within the movie are actually directed with a different visual style. They look more stagelike, more artificial. It’s a clever way to show the "fiction" bleeding into the "reality."
📖 Related: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine
Also, look for the cameos. You’ve got Elizabeth McGovern, Hope Davis, and even the real Wynton Marsalis showing up. It’s a "who’s who" of talent that seemed to just be having a good time with a strange script.
Is it worth watching in 2026?
Honestly, yeah. Especially if you’re tired of the hyper-polished, formulaic stuff that dominates the charts. The Tune In Tomorrow film is messy. It’s uneven. Some of the jokes land, others just sort of hover there. But it has heart.
It captures a specific moment in Keanu Reeves' career where he was clearly trying to figure out what kind of actor he wanted to be. And seeing Peter Falk chew the scenery is worth the price of admission alone.
If you're going to track it down, don't expect a masterpiece. Expect a fever dream about radio, romance, and the sheer chaos of being a writer.
Next Steps for the Curious Viewer
To truly appreciate the Tune In Tomorrow film, your best bet is to find a high-quality stream—though it's notoriously tricky to find on the major platforms and often requires a digital rental or a hunt for a physical copy. Once you've seen it, read Aunt Julia and the Scriptwriter by Mario Vargas Llosa. Comparing the two is a masterclass in how American cinema translates international literature. You'll see exactly where the "Hollywood" influence smoothed over the rougher, more cynical edges of the original story. Finally, listen to the Wynton Marsalis soundtrack separately; it’s widely considered one of the best film scores of that decade and stands perfectly well on its own as a jazz album.