It was November 2004. The Pacific Ocean was calm, about 100 miles off the coast of San Diego. Commander David Fravor and Lieutenant Commander Alex Dietrich were flying F/A-18F Super Hornets, essentially the most sophisticated aerial machines on the planet at the time. They weren't looking for aliens. They were just out for a routine training mission. Then the radio crackled. The USS Princeton, a cruiser with advanced SPY-1 radar, had been tracking "multiple anomalous aerial vehicles" for days. These things were dropping from 80,000 feet down to sea level in seconds.
Fravor looked down. He saw a disturbance in the water, like something big was submerged just below the surface. And then he saw it. A white, smooth, oblong object—roughly 40 feet long—hovering just above the waves. No wings. No rotors. No exhaust trails. It looked exactly like a giant Tic Tac.
When Fravor tried to get closer, the Tic Tac video UFO didn't just fly away; it mirrored his movements. It was reactive. As Fravor descended, the object began to climb to meet him. When he got close enough to try a "merge," the thing accelerated so fast it basically vanished. It didn't break the sound barrier with a boom. It just ceased to be where it was and reappeared seconds later on the CAP point—the exact coordinates where Fravor was supposed to go next. How did it know his destination? That’s the part that still keeps pilots up at night.
The Footage That Forced a Government About-Face
For years, this was just another "ghost story" shared by Navy pilots over drinks. It wasn't until 2017, when the New York Times published a bombshell report, that the public finally saw the grainy infrared footage. It’s not Hollywood-quality. It’s shaky, monochrome, and filled with technical telemetry that makes sense only to aviators. But that's exactly why it's so credible.
The Tic Tac video UFO—officially titled "FLIR1" by the Pentagon—shows an object that defies our current understanding of physics. We’re talking about "trans-medium" travel. In the world of aerospace engineering, if you want to fly fast, you need a certain shape. If you want to go underwater, you need another. This thing didn't care. It moved through air and hovered over water with the same effortless lack of friction.
Modern drones are fast, sure. But they can’t go from a dead hover to Mach 20 without shedding their wings or liquefying their internal components. The G-forces involved in the maneuvers witnessed by the Nimitz carrier group would have shredded any known airframe.
Why the Sensor Data Matters More Than the Eyewitnesses
People hallucinate. Pilots get tired. Optical illusions happen on the horizon. But the USS Princeton’s radar doesn't have "feelings." The SPY-1 radar system is designed to track hundreds of incoming missiles simultaneously. It saw these objects descending from the edge of space.
📖 Related: 20 Divided by 21: Why This Decimal Is Weirder Than You Think
When the pilots locked onto the object with their ATFLIR (Advanced Targeting Forward-Looking Infrared) pods, the "Tic Tac" seemed to engage in electronic warfare. It jammed the radar. It showed a level of technological sophistication that—frankly—doesn't exist in the inventories of the U.S., Russia, or China. Not in 2004. Honestly, not even in 2026.
Chad Underwood, the pilot who actually recorded the footage, has been vocal about the fact that the object's movement wasn't "ballistic." It wasn't falling like a rock or flying like a plane. It was moving "erratically," darting around in ways that ignored inertia. If you've ever watched a laser pointer on a wall, that's how the witnesses describe it.
Breaking Down the Five Observables
Luis Elizondo, the former military intelligence officer who ran the Pentagon’s AATIP (Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program), often talks about the "Five Observables." These are the traits that separate a bird or a weather balloon from a genuine U.S.O. (Unidentified Submerged Object) or U.A.P. (Unidentified Aerial Phenomena).
- Anti-gravity lift: No visible control surfaces like wings.
- Sudden and instantaneous acceleration: Going from zero to hypersonic instantly.
- Hypersonic velocities without signatures: No sonic boom, no heat track.
- Low observability: It can basically become invisible to radar or the naked eye.
- Trans-medium travel: Seeing the object move between space, the atmosphere, and the ocean.
The Tic Tac video UFO checked every single box. That is why this specific incident is the "gold standard" for the UFO community. It isn't a grainy photo from a farm in the 1950s. It’s a multi-sensor event involving elite pilots, high-tech radar, and official government declassification.
The Debunkers and the "Glitch" Theory
It’s easy to be a skeptic. Honestly, it’s the safer bet. Some analysts, like Mick West, have suggested that the "movement" seen in the video is actually the result of the camera’s gimbal rotating or a parallax effect. They argue that if the plane is turning, a stationary object might look like it’s zooming off screen.
But that theory has a massive hole: it ignores the pilots' eyes.
👉 See also: When Can I Pre Order iPhone 16 Pro Max: What Most People Get Wrong
Fravor and Dietrich saw it with their own eyeballs. They saw it move against the backdrop of the ocean. They saw it react to their jets. A camera glitch doesn't explain why the USS Princeton tracked the same objects for an entire week before the intercept. It doesn't explain the "churning water" that looked like something the size of a 747 was submerged below the Tic Tac.
What This Means for Global Security
If these aren't "little green men," then what are they?
The Pentagon is worried. If a foreign adversary—say, China—developed "propulsion without propellant" back in 2004, then every carrier strike group in the U.S. Navy is basically a floating paperweight. That’s the real reason the UAP Task Force was formed. It’s not about finding E.T.; it’s about making sure we aren't being leapfrogged by terrestrial tech that makes our trillion-dollar F-35s look like biplanes.
However, most experts agree that the tech is too advanced. We’re talking about a leap equivalent to going from a horse and buggy to a warp drive. There is no "intermediate" tech. We don't see the exhaust-driven prototypes that would lead to a Tic Tac. It just appeared, fully formed, with capabilities that seem to manipulate gravity itself.
The Scientific Perspective
Dr. Kevin Knuth, a former NASA scientist and professor of physics at the University of Albany, actually crunched the numbers on the Nimitz encounter. He estimated the accelerations of these objects to be in excess of 5,000 Gs.
To put that in perspective:
A human passes out at about 9 Gs.
An F-16 fighter jet starts to break apart at around 12 to 15 Gs.
5,000 Gs is... well, it's impossible.
✨ Don't miss: Why Your 3-in-1 Wireless Charging Station Probably Isn't Reaching Its Full Potential
Unless, of course, the object isn't "pushing" through the air, but is instead creating a localized bubble of spacetime. This is the "Alcubierre drive" theory. If you move the space around the craft rather than the craft itself, you don't feel the G-forces. You don't create a sonic boom. You just... move.
Getting Real About the Stigma
For decades, talking about the Tic Tac video UFO would get a pilot grounded. It was a career-killer. But the culture is shifting.
In 2023, David Grusch, a former intelligence official, testified under oath to Congress that the U.S. has a "crash retrieval program." He mentioned that "non-human biologics" have been recovered. While he didn't specifically link those biologics to the 2004 Tic Tac incident, the implication is clear: the government knows these things are physical objects. They aren't swamp gas. They aren't "mass hallucinations."
We have entered an era of "Radical Transparency"—or at least, the messy, slow-motion version of it. The 2024 and 2025 NDAA (National Defense Authorization Act) included specific language forcing government agencies to hand over UAP records. We are finally asking the right questions, even if the answers are uncomfortable.
Practical Steps for the Curious
If you're trying to separate fact from fiction in the world of UAPs, don't just watch YouTube "experts." Go to the source material.
- Read the Executive Summary: Search for the "2004 Nimitz Pilot Report." It’s a 13-page document that was leaked (and later verified) which contains the minute-by-minute accounts from the crew of the Princeton and the pilots.
- Analyze the SCU Report: The Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies (SCU) released a 270-page forensic analysis of the Nimitz encounter. It’s dense, but it’s the most rigorous scientific look at the data available.
- Watch the Full Testimony: Look up the July 2023 House Oversight Committee hearing on UAPs. Hearing David Fravor describe the event in his own words, under oath, is much more impactful than any documentary.
- Monitor the AARO Website: The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) is the official Pentagon office for this. They occasionally release declassified videos and "trends" reports, though skeptics say they are still too dismissive of the truly "weird" cases.
The Tic Tac video UFO remains the most significant piece of evidence we have. It’s a bridge between the "woo-woo" world of sci-fi and the cold, hard reality of military sensor data. Whether it's a secret drone, a foreign breakthrough, or something from "somewhere else," one thing is certain: our sky is a lot more crowded than we thought.
Keep an eye on the Congressional record. The next few years of declassification will likely focus on the "underwater" aspect of these sightings, which many insiders claim is even more compelling than the aerial footage. We are just scratching the surface of what the Navy actually knows about what's lurking in our oceans.