It started with a photo of a drag queen and a woman in a niqab sitting next to each other on a crowded New York City subway. Simple enough. But in the weird, hyper-reactive world of 2017 Twitter, that single image became the spark for one of the most enduring political jokes of the decade. This is the future liberals want wasn't meant to be funny when it was first typed out. It was intended as a warning—a "look at this chaos" moment from a conservative account.
The internet had other plans.
Within hours, the phrase was hijacked. People started pairing it with photos of Batman and Robin holding hands, scenes from The Fifth Element, and high-tech solarpunk utopias. It became a masterclass in "reclaiming the narrative." Honestly, it’s one of those rare moments where the sheer absurdity of online discourse actually produced something culturally significant. It revealed a massive gap in how different groups of people visualize "the good life."
The Accidental Birth of a Viral Giant
The original tweet came from an account called @polNewsNetwork1 (now suspended). On March 1, 2017, they posted the subway photo with that infamous caption. They were trying to highlight what they saw as a clash of incompatible cultures or a breakdown of traditional norms.
They failed. Miserably.
Twitter users immediately saw the photo—which, frankly, just looked like a normal Tuesday in Brooklyn—and thought, "Yeah, actually, that looks pretty chill." The two people in the photo, drag performer Gilda Wabbit and the woman in the niqab, weren't arguing. They were just... commuting. It was a picture of coexistence.
Social media is a weird beast. When you try to use a photo of peaceful coexistence as a "scary" omen, you’re basically handing your opponents a gift-wrapped win. The this is the future liberals want meme took off because it exposed a fundamental truth: what one person sees as a dystopia, another sees as a vibrant, inclusive community.
Why Irony is the Best Defense
You’ve probably seen the variations. There’s the one with the cat wearing a tiny hat. There’s the one with a dense, walkable city filled with plants and no cars. The humor works because it mocks the original poster's fear. By leaning into the "accusation," liberals and leftists effectively neutralized the scare tactic.
📖 Related: Why American Beauty by the Grateful Dead is Still the Gold Standard of Americana
It’s a tactic called "subversive recontextualization." Sounds fancy, right? It basically just means taking someone else's weapon and using it to decorate your living room.
The Evolution of the Meme Throughout the 2020s
Memes usually have the shelf life of an open avocado. They’re green for an hour and then they turn into brown mush. But this one stuck around. Why? Because the political divide it mocks didn't go away; it got wider.
As we moved into the 2020s, the meme shifted from just being about "identity" to being about infrastructure and lifestyle. You started seeing it attached to photos of:
- High-speed rail maps (the "forbidden" American dream).
- European-style plazas where people drink espresso instead of sitting in traffic.
- Artistic renderings of "green" cities.
- Dogs in strollers.
It stopped being just a retort to social conservatism and started being a shorthand for any kind of progressive wish fulfillment. If you want a 15-minute city where you don't need a car to buy milk? This is the future liberals want. If you want a world where every public park has a community fridge? Again, this is the future liberals want.
The Dog-Whistle That Backfired
The original intent of the post was arguably a dog-whistle regarding Islam and LGBTQ+ rights. It was meant to trigger a visceral reaction in a specific voting base. But the internet is younger and generally more progressive than the creators of such posts realized.
Instead of being shocked, the majority of the responding audience was bored by the attempt at outrage. When you try to make "people minding their own business on a train" look like the end of civilization, you just end up looking out of touch. This disconnect is why the this is the future liberals want meme remains a staple of political commentary. It highlights the absurdity of modern "culture war" framing.
The Visual Language of the Joke
What makes a good "future liberals want" post? It’s usually a mix of the mundane and the fantastic.
👉 See also: Why October London Make Me Wanna Is the Soul Revival We Actually Needed
- The Subversion: Taking something that is objectively harmless (like a guy in a dress or a bike lane) and presenting it as a threat.
- The Hyperbole: Using images from sci-fi movies like Star Trek to represent what a slightly higher tax bracket for billionaires might buy us.
- The Pure Nonsense: Posting a picture of a Capybara sitting on a crocodile. Why? Because it’s peaceful. And apparently, peace is a partisan issue now.
I remember seeing one that was just a picture of a really well-organized spice rack. It got 50,000 likes. It’s funny because it suggests that even "order" is somehow part of a secret agenda. It pokes fun at the idea that everything—down to how we organize our kitchens or our commute—is a battlefield.
Why This Matters for Modern SEO and Content
If you're looking at this from a digital marketing or cultural analysis perspective, you have to realize that this meme is a goldmine for understanding "sentiment." It’s not just a joke; it’s a data point. It shows that the most effective way to combat negative campaigning in the digital age isn't with a long-form essay or a fact-check.
It’s with a joke.
A fact-check is a lecture. A meme is a conversation. People share the this is the future liberals want meme because it makes them feel like they're "in" on the joke. It builds a sense of community.
The "Aesthetic" Factor
There is a whole sub-genre of this meme called "Solarpunk." If you haven't fallen down that rabbit hole yet, you should. It’s an aesthetic that imagines a future where technology and nature live in harmony. It’s all sun-drenched balconies, wind turbines that look like art, and lush greenery.
Whenever a conservative pundit posts a photo of a bleak, grey city and blames "liberal policies," someone inevitably counters with a Solarpunk image and the caption "This is the future liberals want." It’s a visual tug-of-war. We are literally fighting over what the year 2050 should look like through JPEGs.
The Dark Side of the Meme
We can't talk about this without acknowledging that the meme started from a place of genuine hostility. The original post was an attempt to marginalize two specific groups of people. While the internet turned it into a joke, the underlying tension is real.
✨ Don't miss: How to Watch The Wolf and the Lion Without Getting Lost in the Wild
The meme works because it addresses a very real fear that some people have: the fear of change. The fear that the world is becoming unrecognizable. By mocking that fear, the meme-makers are essentially saying, "Your fear is irrational." That's a powerful political statement, but it also explains why the meme can be so polarizing.
For some, it’s an empowering laugh. For others, it’s proof that their concerns are being dismissed.
Real-World Examples of the Meme in Action
- Public Transit Debates: Whenever a new bike lane is proposed in a city like Los Angeles or Austin, the comment sections are flooded with this phrase.
- Architecture: Brutalist architecture vs. Biophilic design.
- Fashion: Harry Styles in a dress on the cover of Vogue.
Each of these moments triggered a wave of "This is the future liberals want" posts. It has become the "Thanks, Obama" of the 2020s—a versatile, all-purpose phrase that can be used ironically to deflect almost any criticism.
How to Use This Knowledge
If you’re a creator, an advertiser, or just someone trying to understand why your Twitter feed looks the way it does, there are a few takeaways here.
First, authenticity kills forced narratives. The reason the original @polNewsNetwork1 post failed is that it felt forced. It tried to tell people they should be upset about a photo that clearly showed no one being harmed.
Second, humor is the ultimate equalizer. If you can make people laugh at an accusation, the accusation loses its power. This is a tactic used by brands and politicians alike.
Finally, understand that the "future" is a powerful brand. Everyone is selling a version of what tomorrow looks like. Whether it's a tech CEO selling a metaverse or a politician selling a "return to tradition," they are all competing for the same mental space. The this is the future liberals want meme is just the most honest version of that competition. It lays the cards on the table. It says, "Yeah, we want the train, the drag queen, and the niqab. What’s your point?"
Practical Steps for Engaging with Viral Political Trends
Don't just watch the memes go by. If you’re trying to navigate this landscape, keep these points in mind:
- Analyze the Source: Always look at the original context. Was the post meant to be a joke, or was it a "failed" serious post? The funniest memes are almost always the ones that weren't meant to be funny.
- Watch the Visual Shifts: Notice how the imagery changes. We’ve moved from "subway photos" to "AI-generated utopias." This tells you what the current "ideal" is for a certain demographic.
- Avoid the "Cringe" Trap: If you’re a brand, don't try to use this meme unless you actually understand the irony. There is nothing worse than a corporate Twitter account using a political meme incorrectly. It’s the fastest way to get "ratioed."
- Focus on the Subtext: What is the meme actually arguing for? Usually, it's a plea for pluralism—the idea that many different kinds of people can exist in the same space without the world ending.
The this is the future liberals want meme isn't going anywhere because the debate it represents is the central debate of our time. It’s about who gets to belong in public spaces and what our cities should look like. As long as people are arguing about bike lanes and subway etiquette, this meme will stay relevant. It’s a shorthand for a much bigger, much more complicated conversation about the soul of society. And honestly? It’s a lot more fun than reading a 40-page policy white paper.