Everything in the NFL goes in cycles. For a decade, we were told the running game was dead, buried under a mountain of analytics that claimed passing was the only way to win in the modern era. You’ve seen the charts. You’ve heard the "running backs don't matter" crowd shouting from the digital rooftops. But then, things shifted. Defenses got smaller and faster to stop the Patrick Mahomes of the world. They started playing with two high safeties, daring coaches to hand the ball off.
And coaches finally did it.
They started running. Hard.
💡 You might also like: KC Chiefs Season Tickets: Why the First Year Price Kills Your Wallet
If you look at the landscape of professional football today, the running game isn't just a secondary thought or a way to kill the clock in the fourth quarter. It’s the foundational philosophy for the league's most terrifying offenses. It’s weird, honestly. We have more passing talent than ever, yet the most successful teams are the ones that can bully you at the line of scrimmage.
The Mathematical Revenge of the Running Game
Analytics didn't actually kill the run; it just refined it. Ten years ago, "establishing the run" meant running into a brick wall on first down for two yards just to prove you were tough. That was dumb. Today’s running game is about light boxes. If a defense puts six or fewer players in the box to protect against the deep ball, the math says you run. Period.
The Baltimore Ravens, led by Lamar Jackson and a rotating door of physical backs, proved that a dominant running game creates a "gravity" that sucks defenders in. This opens up those massive passing windows we see on play-action. Without the threat of the run, those windows simply don't exist. You can’t have one without the other. It’s basically physics. When a 250-pound human is sprinting at a 190-pound defensive back, the defensive back has to make a choice. Usually, that choice involves moving toward the line of scrimmage, which is exactly what the quarterback wants.
San Francisco’s Kyle Shanahan is probably the best example of this. He doesn't just run the ball; he uses the running game to dress up his passing plays. Everything looks the same for the first two seconds. The offensive line moves the same. The back takes the same step. By the time the linebacker realizes it’s a pass, the ball is already whistling past his ear.
Why Linebackers Hate Modern Schemes
It’s a nightmare for defenders. In the old days, you knew where the ball was going. Now? You have wide receivers like Deebo Samuel or Justin Jefferson taking handoffs. You have "Pony" personnel with two elite backs on the field at once. The running game has become a shell game. It’s about deception as much as it is about power.
The Myth of the "Replaceable" Running Back
We’ve heard for years that you can find a productive runner anywhere. Fourth round, sixth round, undrafted—it doesn't matter, right? Well, sort of. While you can find serviceable yards anywhere, the elite running game requires a special kind of athlete.
Look at Christian McCaffrey or Saquon Barkley. These guys aren't just "runners." They are offensive weapons that dictate how a defense aligns. When a team has a back that can win in the running game and also line up in the slot, it breaks the defensive coordinator's brain. You can't stay in base personnel because they'll beat your linebacker in coverage. You can't go to nickel because they'll run it down your throat.
- Zone Blocking: Requires agile linemen who can move laterally.
- Gap/Power Schemes: Pure "man-on-man" violence.
- Duo: A scheme that relies on double teams and the back's vision.
The variation is what makes it work. A team that only runs one style is easy to scout. A team that can switch from a wide zone to a heavy power look on the fly is basically unguardable.
Efficiency Over Volume
The stat nerds—and I say that with affection—were right about one thing: raw rushing yards are a "junk" stat. If you carry the ball 40 times for 100 yards, your running game actually sucked. It means you were inefficient. The metrics that matter now are Success Rate and EPA (Expected Points Added) per carry.
A four-yard gain on 3rd and 3 is a massive win. A four-yard gain on 1st and 10 is just okay.
Modern play-callers are hunting for "explosive runs"—carries that go for 12 or more yards. These plays are backbreakers. They tire out the pass rush. There is nothing more demoralizing for a defensive end than chasing a quarterback for three quarters only to have a fresh running back blast him in the ribs on a lead block. It takes the "stinger" out of the pass rush. That’s the hidden value of a persistent running game. It’s not just about the yards; it’s about the physical toll.
The Impact of the Mobile Quarterback
We can't talk about the running game without talking about the "plus-one" advantage. When your quarterback is a threat to run, the defense has to account for him. This gives the offense a numerical advantage. In a traditional handoff, the QB stands there and watches, meaning the defense has 11 players to stop 10. When the QB can keep the ball, it’s 11 on 11.
That’s why the running game has exploded in efficiency lately. Players like Josh Allen or Anthony Richardson make it impossible to play "sound" defense. You have to "spy" the QB, which means you have one less guy to stop the primary runner. It's a math problem that defenses are currently losing.
The Physicality Factor
Football is still a game of will. You can have all the fancy tech and tracking chips you want, but if one team is hitting harder than the other, they usually win. The running game is the purest expression of that.
I remember watching a game recently where a team was down by two scores. They stopped throwing. Everyone in the stadium knew they were going to run. And they still couldn't be stopped. That kind of dominant running game is a psychological weapon. It tells the opponent, "We are stronger than you, and there’s nothing you can do about it."
It changes the vibe on the sideline. It builds an identity. Teams that can't run the ball in December and January don't win Super Bowls. It's an old cliché because it’s true. When the wind is blowing at 30 miles per hour and the grass is slick, your 50-yard bombs aren't going to save you. Your running game will.
Actionable Takeaways for the Modern Game
If you're looking to understand where the league is heading, stop looking at passing yards and start looking at "Heavy" personnel groupings. The trend is moving toward more tight ends and more versatile fullbacks.
- Watch the Front Seven: Notice how defenses are getting lighter to cope with speed. This is an invitation for the offense to run.
- Identify the Scheme: Learn to spot the difference between a zone run (linemen moving together) and a power run (linemen pulling and trapping).
- Track Success Rate: Ignore the total yards. Look at how often a runner gains the necessary yardage to stay "on schedule."
- Value the O-Line: A great running game is 70% offensive line play. If a team has two backup guards starting, their run efficiency will plummet regardless of who the back is.
The running game isn't a relic of the past. It’s the future. By using it to exploit the "speed-first" evolution of defenses, smart teams are finding more space than ever before. It’s not about being "old school." It’s about being smart enough to take what the defense gives you—and right now, they are giving up the run.