If you walked into a theater in late 2018 expecting a cozy, traditional retelling of the Loxley legend, you were probably in for a massive shock. The Robin Hood 2018 movie didn't want to be a period piece. It wanted to be a gritty, high-octane war movie that felt more like Black Hawk Down or The Dark Knight than something involving men in tights. Honestly, the results were... polarizing.
Most people remember it as a box office flop. It cost around $100 million to make and barely scraped past that in global ticket sales. But looking back on it now, there is something weirdly fascinating about how Director Otto Bathurst tried to reinvent a story we’ve heard a thousand times. He didn't just want a bow and arrow; he wanted a "bow-and-arrow machine gun."
The stylized chaos of the Robin Hood 2018 movie
The film opens with a sequence that feels like a fever dream of the Third Crusade. Taron Egerton plays Robin of Loxley, but instead of a noble knight, he's a draftee in what looks like a modern tactical unit. They aren't just shooting arrows. They are "clearing rooms" in a stone-walled desert city.
It was a choice.
The production design by Jean-Vincent Puzos deliberately mixed time periods. You’ve got the Sheriff of Nottingham (played with deliciously over-the-top menace by Ben Mendelsohn) wearing a leather trench coat that looks like it came from a 2018 Hugo Boss runway. The commoners look like they’re at a dystopian Coachella. This wasn't an accident. The goal was to make the class struggle feel contemporary. They wanted the audience to think about modern income inequality, not 12th-century feudalism.
Taron Egerton and the training montage
Taron Egerton brought a lot of charisma to the role. Coming off the success of Kingsman, he was the perfect choice for a "superhero" version of the character. He spent months training with Lars Andersen, a real-life "speed-shooting" archer who can fire multiple arrows in seconds.
The training montage in the Robin Hood 2018 movie is actually one of the highlights. It's fast. It's kinetic. Jamie Foxx, playing a version of Little John (named Yahya here), acts as the grizzled mentor. Foxx’s performance is grounded, providing a necessary counterweight to the CGI-heavy action sequences. He's a Moorish soldier who sneaks back to England to dismantle the war machine from the inside. It’s a bit of a "buddy cop" dynamic, and honestly, it’s the best part of the film's chemistry.
💡 You might also like: Actor Most Academy Awards: The Record Nobody Is Breaking Anytime Soon
Why the critics weren't buying it
Critics were brutal. Rotton Tomatoes gave it a dismal 15% score. Why? Because the movie couldn't decide what it wanted to be.
One minute it’s a gritty war drama. The next, it’s a heist movie. Then it turns into a political thriller about the Church’s corruption. By trying to do everything, it often felt like it was doing nothing particularly well. Critics like Glenn Kenny of The New York Times pointed out that the film felt like it was "auditioning for a franchise that was never going to happen."
There's a scene involving a horse chase over the rooftops of Nottingham. It’s visually impressive, sure. But it feels like it belongs in The Fast and the Furious. For many, this was the breaking point where the movie stopped being a Robin Hood story and started being a generic action flick with names borrowed from folklore.
The script and the "Resistance" vibe
The writing, handled by Ben Chandler and David James Kelly, leans hard into the idea of a popular uprising. The Sheriff isn't just a greedy tax collector. He's a demagogue. He uses fear of "the Saracens" to control the populace. It’s very on-the-nose.
"Loxley, you're a lord. Act like one," the Sheriff sneers.
The dialogue is snappy, maybe too snappy. It lacks the poetic weight of something like the 1991 Kevin Costner version or the ruggedness of Ridley Scott’s 2010 take. It feels like it was written for a Generation Z audience that the studio wasn't sure even wanted a Robin Hood movie.
📖 Related: Ace of Base All That She Wants: Why This Dark Reggae-Pop Hit Still Haunts Us
Behind the scenes: A troubled production?
Making a $100 million movie is never easy. Lionsgate and Summit Entertainment were betting big on this. They filmed primarily in Dubrovnik, Croatia, and Hungary. Dubrovnik, with its stunning medieval walls, doubled as Nottingham. It’s a beautiful city, but when you add CGI refineries and industrial smoke, it loses its soul.
Leonardo DiCaprio was a producer on the project through his company, Appian Way. His involvement usually suggests a certain level of prestige, but here, the focus was clearly on commercial appeal. They wanted a "reboot" in the vein of Guy Ritchie’s King Arthur: Legend of the Sword. Ironically, both movies suffered similar fates. They tried to "Marvel-ize" classic legends, and the audience stayed home.
The costume controversy
Let’s talk about the jackets. People on the internet went wild over the costumes. Robin wears a quilted, stitched leather hoodie that looks like it costs $4,000 at a boutique in Soho.
Designer Julian Day defended the look, saying he wanted to bridge the gap between historical and modern. But in a movie about the poor vs. the rich, having the "hero of the people" look like he’s wearing high-fashion streetwear felt a bit tone-deaf to some viewers. It added to the "cosplay" feel of the whole production.
Is the Robin Hood 2018 movie worth a rewatch?
If you can separate it from the source material, the Robin Hood 2018 movie is actually a decent popcorn flick. The action is well-choreographed. The pacing is relentless. You won't be bored.
Ben Mendelsohn is always worth the price of admission. He plays the villain with a simmering, quiet rage that occasionally explodes into screaming fits. It’s classic Mendelsohn. And Taron Egerton is genuinely likable, even when he's being asked to do things that defy the laws of physics.
👉 See also: '03 Bonnie and Clyde: What Most People Get Wrong About Jay-Z and Beyoncé
Also, the "Molotov cocktail" scene during the final riot is peak 2018 cinema. It’s loud, it’s messy, and it’s undeniably energetic.
What we can learn from the 2018 version
The failure of this film changed how studios look at IP. You can't just take a name like "Robin Hood" and slap a modern skin on it. The audience wants a reason to care.
- Focus on the "Why": The 2018 version focused on the "How" (how he shoots, how he steals) but missed the emotional "Why."
- Commit to a Tone: If you want to be a gritty war movie, be a gritty war movie. Don't try to be a teen romance and a political satire at the same time.
- Respect the Legend: You can innovate, but if you change too much, you lose the core fans who actually want to see a Robin Hood story.
If you’re a fan of Taron Egerton or just want to see some cool archery stunts, give it a shot on a rainy Sunday afternoon. Just don't expect a history lesson.
Next Steps for Film Fans
To truly appreciate the evolution of this character, compare the Robin Hood 2018 movie to the 1938 Errol Flynn version. Notice the shift from "joyful outlaw" to "tortured veteran." For those interested in the technical side of the film, look up Lars Andersen’s YouTube channel to see the real archery techniques that inspired Egerton’s stunt work. Finally, if you enjoyed Ben Mendelsohn's performance, check out his work in Bloodline or Rogue One to see how he refined that specific "bureaucratic villain" archetype.