You’re sitting at a coffee shop, staring at a wooden table. It looks solid. It’s brown. It feels hard under your elbows. But if you actually stop and think about it—really think—everything you know about that table is basically a lie told to you by your own brain. This isn't some "Matrix" movie trope; it's the core of what Bertrand Russell was getting at in 1912 when he laid out the problems of philosophy in his famous little book.
Philosophy isn't just for dusty libraries. It’s about the fact that we can’t actually prove the world exists outside our own heads. Weird, right?
The Table That Isn't There
Let's stick with that table for a second. You see it as brown, but the guy sitting across from you sees a white glare where the sun hits it. To a microscopic bug, that smooth surface is a mountain range of jagged wood fibers. So, what color is it really? Russell argues that there is no "real" color. There’s just the sensation we get under specific light at a specific angle.
We’re all stuck behind our eyes, looking at "sense-data." We don't see the object; we see the data our brain interprets. This creates a massive gap. If we only know the data, how do we know there’s actually a physical thing causing it? Honestly, we can't be 100% sure. We just assume it’s there because life is way too complicated if we don't.
It’s a bit of a mind-bender.
Most people go through their entire day without questioning if the floor will stay solid. But the moment you start digging into the problems of philosophy, you realize our entire reality is built on a foundation of "probably." Russell calls this the "instinctive belief." We have no logical proof that the external world exists, but we have a very strong feeling that it does.
Induction: Why Your Toaster is a Liar
You expect the sun to rise tomorrow. Why? Because it’s happened every day of your life. That’s induction.
💡 You might also like: Wire brush for cleaning: What most people get wrong about choosing the right bristles
David Hume, the 18th-century Scottish philosopher, was the one who really ruined this for everyone. He pointed out that just because something happened a billion times in the past doesn't mean it has to happen again. There is no logical law saying the future must resemble the past.
Think about a chicken on a farm. Every morning, the farmer comes out and feeds it. The chicken, being a fan of induction, thinks, "The farmer loves me! Every time I see him, I get grain!" This works out great for the chicken until the day before Thanksgiving, when the farmer shows up with a hatchet instead of a bucket.
The chicken’s "knowledge" was based on a pattern that felt solid but wasn't.
When we talk about the problems of philosophy, the "problem of induction" is the big one that keeps scientists up at night. Science is entirely based on the idea that nature is uniform. If gravity suddenly decided to work sideways tomorrow, all our physics books would be trash. We can’t prove gravity will work tomorrow; we just bet our lives on it every time we take a step.
Knowledge by Acquaintance vs. Description
You know the color blue because you’ve seen it. That’s acquaintance. You know that Abraham Lincoln was tall because you read it in a book. That’s description.
Most of what we "know" is actually just stuff we’ve heard or read. You’ve probably never seen a black hole or the Great Wall of China, but you believe they exist. Russell makes a huge distinction here because "description" is prone to error. You’re trusting a chain of information that could be broken at any point.
📖 Related: Images of Thanksgiving Holiday: What Most People Get Wrong
Acquaintance is different. It’s raw experience. But even acquaintance is limited to things like your own feelings and immediate sensations. You can be certain you feel cold, but you can’t be certain the room is cold.
The Mystery of General Ideas
How do we even talk to each other?
Think about the word "justice." We all use it, but have you ever seen a "justice" walking down the street? You see just acts, sure. But the concept itself—the "universal"—is something that doesn't exist in the physical world.
Plato thought these universals lived in a magical realm of perfect ideas. Russell was a bit more grounded but still admitted that these things are weird. If universals aren't in our minds (because we all share the same idea of "two plus two equals four") and they aren't in the physical world, where are they?
They're just... there.
This leads into one of the most frustrating problems of philosophy: the relationship between language and reality. We use words to describe things that aren't physical, and yet those words are the only reason we can build societies or do math. Without universals, we’d just be pointing at things and grunting.
👉 See also: Why Everyone Is Still Obsessing Over Maybelline SuperStay Skin Tint
Can We Ever Actually Know Anything?
René Descartes famously tried to strip away everything he couldn't be sure of. He doubted the walls, his body, the stars. He ended up with "I think, therefore I am."
But Russell and others pushed further. Even "I think" assumes there’s an "I" doing the thinking. Maybe there’s just a thought happening, and the "I" is just another assumption.
This kind of skepticism feels like a dead end, but it’s actually the starting point for real wisdom. If you realize that your certainty is based on shaky ground, you become a lot more open to other perspectives. You stop yelling at people on the internet (maybe) because you realize your "truth" is just your brain's best guess based on limited data.
Practical Steps for Living with Philosophical Uncertainty
Philosophy isn't about finding the "right" answer because, honestly, we’ve been looking for 2,500 years and haven't found one yet. It's about the value of the questions.
- Question your "obvious" truths. Next time you're certain someone is "wrong," ask yourself if you're reacting to reality or just your interpretation of it.
- Embrace the "Maybe." Science and logic are tools, not absolute gods. Recognizing the limits of induction keeps you humble and curious.
- Read the source material. Don't just take a summary's word for it. Pick up The Problems of Philosophy by Bertrand Russell. It’s surprisingly short and written for regular people, not just academics.
- Distinguish between what you feel and what is. When you're stressed, remember that your sensation of "the world is ending" is sense-data, not necessarily a fact about the external world.
- Study different epistemologies. Look into how different cultures define knowledge. Western philosophy is obsessed with proof, but other traditions focus more on lived experience or relational truth.
The real goal of diving into these problems isn't to become a hermit who doubts the existence of their own feet. It's to expand your mind so that you're no longer a prisoner of local prejudices and habitual beliefs. As Russell put it, philosophy keeps alive that sense of wonder by showing familiar things in an unfamiliar light.
Stop looking for the "answer" to the table. Start appreciating the fact that the table is a mystery you get to interact with every day.